Christian Theune wrote:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File ZODB3-3.9.3-py2.6-linux-i686.egg/ZEO/zrpc/connection.py, line
581, in handle_request
ret = meth(*args)
File gocept.zeoraid-1.0b6-py2.6.egg/gocept/zeoraid/storage.py, line
219, in history
assert version is ''
Jim Fulton wrote:
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
There's nothing official or supported about a backup solution without
automated tests.
So I guess there isn't one.
Right, so what does Zope Corp use?
We use ZRS, of course.
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 5:49 AM, Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk wrote:
Hi Jim,
It would be great if the two recent fixes I committed could make it into a
3.9.4 release some time soon...
What can I do to help this happen?
Assuming I do anything necessary, when could you do this
2009/11/20 Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk:
Jim Fulton wrote:
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk
wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
There's nothing official or supported about a backup solution without
automated tests.
So I guess there isn't one.
Right, so
Jim Fulton wrote:
I need to review the changes before the release. I'll probably reject the
repozo change without an automated test.
Are you serious? You'd rather have a broken tool than one that isn't
broken on the basis that the existing tests aren't part of the test
suite that gets run by
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk
wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
There's nothing official or supported about a backup solution without
automated tests.
So I guess
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
I need to review the changes before the release. I'll probably reject the
repozo change without an automated test.
Are you serious? You'd rather have a broken tool than one that isn't broken
on
[Jim Fulton]
I need to review the changes before the release. I'll probably reject the
repozo change without an automated test.
[Chris Withers]\
Are you serious? You'd rather have a broken tool than one that isn't
broken on the basis that the existing tests aren't part of the test
suite that
On Nov 20, 2009, at 7:32 AM, Chris Withers wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
I'd prefer that there be a file-storage backup solution out of the box.
repozo is the logical choice. It sounds like it needs some love though.
This isn't something I'd likely get to soon.
I'm not sure how much love
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk wrote:
...
I'm not sure how much love repozo needs. It works, and it won't need
changing until FileStorage's format changes, which I don't see happening any
time soon.
It just occurred to me that repozo doesn't support
Tim Peters wrote:
That's what he said -- and you made him repeat it several times by now.
Yes, I find it hard to believe that someone would deliberately break
something that someone else has taken the trouble to fix (and run the
tests for!)...
I've learned my lesson, I won't try and
Jim Fulton wrote:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk wrote:
...
I'm not sure how much love repozo needs. It works, and it won't need
changing until FileStorage's format changes, which I don't see happening any
time soon.
It just occurred to me that repozo
Jeff Shell wrote:
For what it's worth, I've dealt with broken / unloved /
mildly-out-of-date ZODB scripts by making a new package that my
little company uses internally.
I don't agree with this because it's fragmenting a tiny development
group even further, no to mention creating private
2009/11/20 Jim Fulton j...@zope.com:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk wrote:
...
I'm not sure how much love repozo needs. It works, and it won't need
changing until FileStorage's format changes, which I don't see happening any
time soon.
It just occurred
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 5:49 AM, Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk wrote:
Hi Jim,
It would be great if the two recent fixes I committed could make it into a
3.9.4 release some time soon...
What can I do to help this happen?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tres Seaver wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 5:49 AM, Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk
wrote:
Hi Jim,
It would be great if the two recent fixes I committed could make it into a
3.9.4 release some time soon...
What can I
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tres Seaver wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 5:49 AM, Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk
wrote:
Hi Jim,
It would be great if the two recent fixes I
Jim Fulton wrote:
+class RepozoTests(unittest.TestCase):
+
+def test_importability(self):
+from ZODB.scripts import repozo
+
I appreciate your dedication to quality.
That test passes under ZODB 3.9.3 with Python 2.6.
...but it will emit a deprecation warning, which I
Jim Fulton wrote:
No, we should tell them they should use a mostly untested tool to do backups
that doesn't work with blobs. That should inspire confidence.
Does Zope 2.12 use Blobs?
Not by default, no.
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Batch Processing Python Consulting
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tres Seaver wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 5:49 AM, Chris Withers
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
...
with Zope
2.12 and later now running on Python 2.6, we should just tell people
Sorry, you can't do backups?
No, we should tell them they should use a mostly untested tool to do backups
that doesn't work with
On Nov 20, 2009, at 11:52 AM, Jim Fulton wrote:
If configured, sure.
I would not trust repozo + blob backups.
I don't trust Blobs. A year ago, I reverted all of the code I had for our CMS
that supported Blobs as it was impossible to copy their data in a basic Zope 3
copy/past/move. I think
On 11/20/2009 08:07 PM, Jeff Shell wrote:
On Nov 20, 2009, at 11:52 AM, Jim Fulton wrote:
If configured, sure.
I would not trust repozo + blob backups.
I don't trust Blobs. A year ago, I reverted all of the code I had for our CMS
that supported Blobs as it was impossible to copy their data
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk wrote:
Hi All (although I guess predominantly Jim),
ZEO/zprc/connection.py contains this rather odd piece of code:
raise
except Exception, msg:
if not isinstance(msg,
Jim Fulton wrote:
It seems a bit bizarre that exceptions are logged at INFO rather than
ERROR...
Agreed. A simple fix and test on a branch would be appreciated.
Done:
http://svn.zope.org/ZODB/branches/chrisw-error_logging/
It would be great if this, too, could make it in a 3.9.4
25 matches
Mail list logo
