[ZODB-Dev] zope cache

2009-12-02 Thread Dganit David
Hi We write a product to with python. After changing the data. When quarrying the object we get inconsistent result. Sometimes we get the previous values. Thanks dganit ___ For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:

Re: [ZODB-Dev] Repozo tests -- not

2009-12-02 Thread Jim Fulton
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 8:44 PM, Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com wrote: Jim Fulton wrote: On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Jim Fulton j...@zope.com wrote: On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote: ... More importantly, Chris' change touches non-trivial

Re: [ZODB-Dev] Repozo tests -- not

2009-12-02 Thread Jim Fulton
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk wrote: Jim Fulton wrote: Well, not really fair enough.  I just looked at the change that Chris made.  It has a bug that would be caught by your test if anyone tried to port repozo to Python 3. Which alternate reality are

Re: [ZODB-Dev] Repozo tests -- not

2009-12-02 Thread Godefroid Chapelle
Jim Fulton wrote: snip No one seems to be willing to step up and take responsibility. I guess everyone assumes I will. Jim I'll take the responsibility of transforming the manual test to an automated... -- Godefroid Chapelle (aka __gotcha) http://bubblenet.be

Re: [ZODB-Dev] zope cache

2009-12-02 Thread Mikko Ohtamaa
Hi Dganit, We write a product to with python. After changing the data.  When quarrying the object we get inconsistent result. Sometimes we get the previous values. Can you please add some details about the problem and a question in the message if you have one. If you are looking for help

Re: [ZODB-Dev] Repozo tests -- not

2009-12-02 Thread Martin Aspeli
Jim Fulton wrote: No one seems to be willing to step up and take responsibility. I guess everyone assumes I will. I know a thing or two about trying to entice people to help maintain open source software. It's certainly not easy. But from a casual observer's perspective, this whole exchange

Re: [ZODB-Dev] Repozo tests -- not

2009-12-02 Thread Jim Fulton
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 7:12 AM, Godefroid Chapelle got...@bubblenet.be wrote: Jim Fulton wrote: snip No one seems to be willing to step up and take responsibility. I guess everyone assumes I will. Jim I'll take the responsibility of transforming the manual test to an automated...

Re: [ZODB-Dev] Repozo tests -- not

2009-12-02 Thread Jim Fulton
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 7:19 AM, Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com wrote: Jim Fulton wrote: In any case, nothing is deleted in subversion. If someone creates even minimal tests that exercise the code you changed, then I'll be happy to reapply the change. At some point, if no one takes

Re: [ZODB-Dev] Repozo tests -- not

2009-12-02 Thread Chris Withers
Jim Fulton wrote: BTW, offline back ups if file-storage even with Blobs is straightforward without repozo. I couldn't parse this, could you restate particularly wrt to what ou mean by offline? If there's a way other than repozo, then it would be great to know what it was... Chris --

Re: [ZODB-Dev] Repozo tests -- not

2009-12-02 Thread Jim Fulton
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 8:01 AM, Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk wrote: Jim Fulton wrote: BTW, offline back ups if file-storage even with Blobs is straightforward without repozo. I couldn't parse this, could you restate particularly wrt to what ou mean by offline? If there's a way other

Re: [ZODB-Dev] Repozo tests -- not

2009-12-02 Thread Chris Withers
Jeff Shell wrote: I'm not sure whose expectations you're satisfying as the items in ZODB.scripts are a wild and inconsistent mess. It's been trial and error just to find ones that seem to work, outside of repozo. Oh the irony of the one script that Jim is looking to remove, because someone

Re: [ZODB-Dev] Repozo tests -- not

2009-12-02 Thread Godefroid Chapelle
Godefroid Chapelle wrote: Jim Fulton wrote: snip No one seems to be willing to step up and take responsibility. I guess everyone assumes I will. Jim I'll take the responsibility of transforming the manual test to an automated... Done in

Re: [ZODB-Dev] Repozo tests -- not

2009-12-02 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Godefroid Chapelle wrote: Godefroid Chapelle wrote: Jim Fulton wrote: snip No one seems to be willing to step up and take responsibility. I guess everyone assumes I will. Jim I'll take the responsibility of transforming the manual test to

Re: [ZODB-Dev] Repozo tests -- not

2009-12-02 Thread Godefroid Chapelle
Tres Seaver wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Godefroid Chapelle wrote: Godefroid Chapelle wrote: Jim Fulton wrote: snip No one seems to be willing to step up and take responsibility. I guess everyone assumes I will. Jim I'll take the responsibility of

Re: [ZODB-Dev] Repozo tests -- not

2009-12-02 Thread Jim Fulton
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 6:30 AM, Jim Fulton j...@zope.com wrote: On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk wrote: Jim Fulton wrote: ... I don't want people to contribute crap. You've made some reasonable contributions recently so I know you are capable of producing

Re: [ZODB-Dev] Repozo tests -- not

2009-12-02 Thread Jim Fulton
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Godefroid Chapelle got...@bubblenet.be wrote: Godefroid Chapelle wrote: Jim Fulton wrote: snip No one seems to be willing to step up and take responsibility. I guess everyone assumes I will. Jim I'll take the responsibility of transforming the manual

Re: [ZODB-Dev] Repozo tests -- not

2009-12-02 Thread Jim Fulton
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Jeff Shell j...@bottlerocket.net wrote: On Dec 2, 2009, at 5:39 AM, Jim Fulton wrote: On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 7:19 AM, Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com wrote: Jim Fulton wrote: ... BTW, offline back ups if file-storage even with Blobs is

Re: [ZODB-Dev] Repozo tests -- not

2009-12-02 Thread Godefroid Chapelle
Tres Seaver wrote: - - Avoid shellling out to run repozo, but rather use its main(), passing argv. I thought of this but decided to not go that way to test that repozo can actually run on a living database. Even if the code that was there still needs to be modified to achieve that goal.

Re: [ZODB-Dev] Repozo tests -- not

2009-12-02 Thread Jim Fulton
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Godefroid Chapelle got...@bubblenet.be wrote: Tres Seaver wrote: - - Avoid shellling out to run repozo, but rather use its main(),   passing argv. I thought of this but decided to not go that way to test that repozo can actually run on a living database. Even