Re: [ZODB-Dev] Stripping version data from databases

2010-09-10 Thread Chris Withers
On 09/09/2010 15:10, Jim Fulton wrote: > I suspect we'll see more cases where people have databases that have > versioned records > that they don't know how to get rid of. (We had a case like this > internally, but we stopped > caring about the database in question before we had to deal with it. :

Re: [ZODB-Dev] attempting to undo an un-undoable transaction gives "NotImplementedError" with ZODB 3.9.5

2010-09-10 Thread Jim Fulton
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 2:27 AM, Chris Withers wrote: > On 09/09/2010 21:47, Jim Fulton wrote: >>> >>> 2010-08-26 22:49:01 ERROR txn.-1338986496 Failed to abort resource >>> manager:>> object at 0x2d509f0>  at 47516176> >>> Traceback (most recent call last): >>>   File "transaction-1.1.0-py2.6.egg

Re: [ZODB-Dev] 3.10.0b6 traceback

2010-09-10 Thread Jim Fulton
These both look like ZODB bugs. Thanks. Jim On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 2:48 AM, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > And another one, not sure if it is related: > > Traceback (most recent call last): >   File > "/srv/software/buildout/eggs/WebError-0.10.2-py2.6.egg/weberror/errormiddleware.py", > line 162, i

Re: [ZODB-Dev] Stripping version data from databases

2010-09-10 Thread Jim Fulton
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 3:04 AM, Chris Withers wrote: > On 09/09/2010 15:10, Jim Fulton wrote: >> I suspect we'll see more cases where people have databases that have >> versioned records >> that they don't know how to get rid of.  (We had a case like this >> internally, but we stopped >> caring a

Re: [ZODB-Dev] 3.10.0b6 traceback

2010-09-10 Thread Jim Fulton
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 2:40 AM, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > I just got the following traceback from a system running 3.10.0b6: As I mentioned before, this looks like a bug. But mainly I want to say: thanks for testing the beta! I hope we're getting close to a final release, and, of course, testi

Re: [ZODB-Dev] 3.10.0b6 traceback

2010-09-10 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Jim Fulton wrote: > But mainly I want to say: thanks for testing the beta!  I hope we're > getting close to a final release, and, of course, testing the betas is > very helpful. :) I'm running beta4 on one small and one large site. So far I've only run into https:

Re: [ZODB-Dev] Volunteer opportunity: backport ZEO client cache fixes

2010-09-10 Thread Nikolay Kim
just send me a notice when i can start > Great! You should hold off a bit. An internal buildbot here just > reported an error in a test that > indicates there's still an issue. I need to investigate. :( smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature