Hello Alan,
They pass since the summit, when Jim fixed the windows failures.
http://winbot.zope.org/builders
Monday, September 27, 2010, 7:17:42 PM, you wrote:
AR> For anyone who cares. ZODB trunk builds win32 and amd64 have been
AR> passing tests for almost a week without failures. Thanks Ji
On 28/09/2010 12:55, Tres Seaver wrote:
> On 09/28/2010 03:36 AM, Chris Withers wrote:
>> On 28/09/2010 00:12, Marius Gedminas wrote:
>>> --- ./OFS/History.py.orig 2010-09-28 02:11:56.535745440 +0300
>>> +++ ./OFS/History.py2010-09-28 02:12:00.043764683 +0300
>>> @@ -151,6 +151,9 @@
>>>
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 3:12 AM, Adam GROSZER wrote:
> Hello Alan,
>
> They pass since the summit, when Jim fixed the windows failures.
>
> http://winbot.zope.org/builders
Actually, they passed since I fixed a couple of ZEO cache management
bugs on August 30 and September 7. What's interesting i
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/ZODB3/3.10.0b7
This is the last release I plan to make before 3.10.0, hopefully, next week.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton
___
For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:
http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/
ZODB-Dev mailing list -
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/ZODB3/3.9.7
This was mainly motivated by the Python 2.7 fix, since we'd previously
made Python 2.7 windows binaries available.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton
___
For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:
http://www.zope.org/Wik
Hello,
I keep getting this traceback with ZODB 3.9.4.
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
"c:\users\nitro\.buildout\eggs\zope.publisher-3.12.3-py2.6.egg\zope\publi
sher\publish.py", line 130, in publish
obj = publication.getApplication(request)
File "c:\anima\sources\anima\src\an
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 6:01 PM, Matthias wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I keep getting this traceback with ZODB 3.9.4.
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File
> "c:\users\nitro\.buildout\eggs\zope.publisher-3.12.3-py2.6.egg\zope\publi
> sher\publish.py", line 130, in publish
> obj = publication.
Am 29.09.2010, 00:34 Uhr, schrieb Jim Fulton :
>> Is this a bug in ZODB?
>
> It appears so. Are you specifying a pool timeout?
I don't set a timeout anywhere specifically. Maybe there is one a default
one buried in grok/ztk, but I couldn't find anything on quick inspection.
However, the error
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 6:42 PM, Matthias wrote:
> Am 29.09.2010, 00:34 Uhr, schrieb Jim Fulton :
>
>>> Is this a bug in ZODB?
>>
>> It appears so. Are you specifying a pool timeout?
>
> I don't set a timeout anywhere specifically. Maybe there is one a default
> one buried in grok/ztk, but I coul
