I don't mean to intrude in this discussion, but I've communicated with
the original poster privately.
--- Dieter Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tim Peters wrote at 2005-12-29 12:59 -0500:
> > ...
> >[Tim Peters]
> >>> It means that _ConnectionPool no longer has a reason to remember
> >>> anyt
--- Tim Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I suggested before that forcing calls to gc.collect() would give more
> evidence. If that doesn't help, then it's most likely that the
> application
> is keeping Connections alive.
I'm not the OP, but I was able to reproduce the problem he was
encounter
