Hello, I'm now thinking of using ZODB for our application. Is it possible to make something like this?
http://hohehohe2.hp.infoseek.co.jp/kerama/misc/shareddict.jpg There are data in a DataHolder object that needs to be saved. DataHolder is not a subclass of Persistent but each data stored in its attribute is persistent. A PersistentDataholder is a subclass of ZODB Persistent which instance works as a proxy of a DataHolder object and it is under ZODB control. There are two reasons I want to do this: a DataHolder object frequently changes it's __class__ or __bases__, and I'd like to make this module storage independent. I know it loses some of ZODB features, automatic _p_changed setting for instance, still ZODB is the best option if we can do this. I think it's o.k. because if we look at how references are made, it is just a normal design using zodb, but it looks weird so I'd like to know if it is really o.k. Well I looked for a mailing list that *uses* ZODB, not that *makes* ZODB but couldn't find one. If this mailing list is not an appopriate one for a question like this, please just let me know. Koichi -------------------------------------- STOP HIV/AIDS. Yahoo! JAPAN Redribbon Campaign 2005 http://pr.mail.yahoo.co.jp/redribbon/ _______________________________________________ For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki: http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/ ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev
