On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 1:44 PM, Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Log message for revision 88796: > Correct error in persistance-bbb logic spotted by Jacob Holm
It seems strange (and a bit frightening) that -- ostensibly -- the tests pass either way the code reads. Is there a missing test here? > Changed: > U zope.component/trunk/src/zope/component/registry.py > > -=- > Modified: zope.component/trunk/src/zope/component/registry.py > =================================================================== > --- zope.component/trunk/src/zope/component/registry.py 2008-07-24 17:32:08 > UTC (rev 88795) > +++ zope.component/trunk/src/zope/component/registry.py 2008-07-24 17:44:53 > UTC (rev 88796) > @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ > if provided is None: > provided = _getUtilityProvided(component) > > - if (self._utility_registrations.get((provided, name)[:2]) > + if (self._utility_registrations.get((provided, name))[:2] > == (component, info)): > # already registered > return -- Benji York Senior Software Engineer Zope Corporation _______________________________________________ For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki: http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/ ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev
