Re: [ZODB-Dev] Re: [ZEO] getExtensionMethods into IServeable?

2008-01-14 Thread Jim Fulton


On Jan 14, 2008, at 5:34 AM, Thomas Lotze wrote:


Jim Fulton wrote:


I know. At the time I got the interfaces in shape, I was thinking of
removing this feature. I didn't like it at all and am still a bit
ambivalent about it. I decided to compromise and leave it in the
implementation but out of the interfaces.


Removing the feature altogether would be bad for us; we're using it in
gocept.zeoraid.

If we do keep this, I might want to be able to expose it a  
different way.

In particular, I'd maybe like these methods to be more ZEO aware.

For now, I think I'd prefer not to add this to the interface.


OK, but I still think that whatever method ends up being used for API
extension should be included in IStorage eventually.


Agreed.

Jim

--
Jim Fulton
Zope Corporation


___
For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:
http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/

ZODB-Dev mailing list  -  ZODB-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev


[ZODB-Dev] Re: [ZEO] getExtensionMethods into IServeable?

2008-01-14 Thread Thomas Lotze
Jim Fulton wrote:

> I know. At the time I got the interfaces in shape, I was thinking of
> removing this feature. I didn't like it at all and am still a bit
> ambivalent about it. I decided to compromise and leave it in the
> implementation but out of the interfaces.

Removing the feature altogether would be bad for us; we're using it in
gocept.zeoraid.

> If we do keep this, I might want to be able to expose it a different way.
> In particular, I'd maybe like these methods to be more ZEO aware.
> 
> For now, I think I'd prefer not to add this to the interface.

OK, but I still think that whatever method ends up being used for API
extension should be included in IStorage eventually.

-- 
Thomas



___
For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:
http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/

ZODB-Dev mailing list  -  ZODB-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev