[ZODB-Dev] Re: record_iternext API is broken

2007-04-24 Thread Jim Fulton
I should have noted that this API isn't widely used AFAIK, so it probably wouldn't be that big a deal to change it. Personally, I'd be inclined to change it to return oid, version, and next (or oid and next). Client code could always call load to get the transaction id and data.

Re: [ZODB-Dev] Re: record_iternext API is broken

2007-04-24 Thread Stephan Richter
On Tuesday 24 April 2007 19:23, Jim Fulton wrote: I should have noted that this API isn't widely used AFAIK, so it   probably wouldn't be that big a deal to change it.  Personally, I'd   be inclined to change it to return oid, version, and next (or oid and   next).  Client code could always