Atmasamarpan Novy wrote at 2007-3-30 01:06 +0200:
> ...
>I was looking at code in the meanwhile and I was thinking more in the
>direction of caching of pickles instead of sharing objects among
>connections. It means that moving from L2 into L1 would require to
>unpickle the object and it is cert
Dieter Maurer wrote:
Jim and Tim convinced me that it would not work (at least not without
lots of code insprection for C extensions handling persistent
objects (such as BTrees):
The problem: while an object may be read only on the application
level, it is not read only below this level:
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
Use ZEO and you get your single L2 cache, file-based, for free...
jens
I was referring to a memory cache. Secondly, there is no possible
performance gain (only loss) one can get by using zeo with its file
cache comparing to a direct file storage. ZEO is a great tool, bu
