Re: [ZODB-Dev] [Performance] excessive time in "Connection.afterCompletion"

2006-04-02 Thread Jim Fulton
Jim Fulton wrote: ... You can do that now. Just start a thread with the main loop. Note that Zope 3 does this now when the Twisted server is used. Jim -- Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered! CTO (540) 361-1714http://www.python.org Z

Re: [ZODB-Dev] [Performance] excessive time in "Connection.afterCompletion"

2006-04-02 Thread Jim Fulton
___ For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki: http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/ ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev

Re: [ZODB-Dev] [Performance] excessive time in "Connection.afterCompletion"

2006-04-02 Thread Dieter Maurer
Hi Tim, Tim Peters wrote at 2006-3-31 18:48 -0500: > ... >> What is the motivation to request synchronized transaction completion >> by default? > >Primarily so we could stop seeing endless threads on zodb-dev asking >why ZEO clients that didn't happen to modify any objects never saw >current data

Re: [ZODB-Dev] [Performance] excessive time in "Connection.afterCompletion"

2006-03-31 Thread Tim Peters
[Dieter Maurer] > We are currently tuning an application for performance and therefore > perform intensive profiling. To our surprise, it turned out > that about 15% of total request time was spent in > "Connection.afterCompletion". "Connection.afterCompletion" is mapped > to "Connection._storage_s