Re: [ZODB-Dev] [announce] NEO 1.0 - scalable and redundant storage for ZODB

2012-08-29 Thread Julien Muchembled
Le 08/29/12 15:54, Leonardo Santagada a écrit : > On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Vincent Pelletier wrote: >> We've just tagged the 1.0 NEO release. > > any plans to support pypy in NEO? We're looking at pypy from time to time but there are at least 3 reasons preventing us to use it for NEO:

Re: [ZODB-Dev] [announce] NEO 1.0 - scalable and redundant storage for ZODB

2012-08-29 Thread Leonardo Santagada
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Vincent Pelletier wrote: > We've just tagged the 1.0 NEO release. any plans to support pypy in NEO? Once ZODB start to run on pypy it would be cool to have relstorage/zeo or neo running on it as well. -- Leonardo Santagada __

Re: [ZODB-Dev] [announce] NEO 1.0 - scalable and redundant storage for ZODB

2012-08-29 Thread Jim Fulton
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Vincent Pelletier wrote: ... > I forgot in the original mail to mention that NEO does all conflict > resolutions on client side rather than server side. The same happens in > relStorage, but this is different from ZEO. That's good. I'd like to move ZEO in this d

Re: [ZODB-Dev] [announce] NEO 1.0 - scalable and redundant storage for ZODB

2012-08-28 Thread Marius Gedminas
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 06:31:05PM +0200, Vincent Pelletier wrote: > On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 16:31:20 +0200, > Martijn Pieters wrote : > > Anything else different? Did you make any performance comparisons > > between RelStorage and NEO? > > I believe the main difference compared to all other ZODB Sto

Re: [ZODB-Dev] [announce] NEO 1.0 - scalable and redundant storage for ZODB

2012-08-28 Thread Vincent Pelletier
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 16:31:20 +0200, Martijn Pieters wrote : > Anything else different? Did you make any performance comparisons > between RelStorage and NEO? I believe the main difference compared to all other ZODB Storage implementation is the finer-grained locking scheme: in all storage impleme

Re: [ZODB-Dev] [announce] NEO 1.0 - scalable and redundant storage for ZODB

2012-08-28 Thread Raoni Castro
2012/8/27 Vincent Pelletier > Hi, > > We've just tagged the 1.0 NEO release. > > ... Release highlights: > - production-ready ! > Is anyone using it in production with Plone 4? Is there performance advantages over ZEO for Plone 4 users? > ... > What you need to know if you are used to ZODB fe

Re: [ZODB-Dev] [announce] NEO 1.0 - scalable and redundant storage for ZODB

2012-08-28 Thread Martijn Pieters
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Vincent Pelletier wrote: > NEO aims at being a replacement for use-cases where ZEO is used, but > with better scalability (by allowing data of a single database to be > distributed over several machines, and by removing database-level > locking), with failure resil

Re: [ZODB-Dev] [announce] NEO 1.0 - scalable and redundant storage for ZODB

2012-08-28 Thread Vincent Pelletier
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 14:37:37 +0200, Vincent Pelletier wrote : > Under the hood, it relies on simple features of SQL databases To make things maybe a bit clearer, from the feedback I get: You can forget about SQL presence. NEO usage of SQL is as a relational as a handful of python dicts is. Except

Re: [ZODB-Dev] [announce] NEO 1.0 - scalable and redundant storage for ZODB

2012-08-27 Thread Lennart Regebro
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Vincent Pelletier wrote: > Hi, > > We've just tagged the 1.0 NEO release. > > NEO aims at being a replacement for use-cases where ZEO is used, but > with better scalability (by allowing data of a single database to be > distributed over several machines, and by rem