On Friday 14 November 2008, Shane Hathaway wrote:
> ... which opens the door for a lot of interesting ways to use the
> persistence framework. Linking your object to the root causes your
> object to be managed by a ZODB.Connection and you get all the associated
> assumptions about pickling, ID man
On Nov 14, 2008, at 6:51 PM, Shane Hathaway wrote:
> Jim Fulton wrote:
>> On Nov 14, 2008, at 6:16 PM, Paul Winkler wrote:
>>
>>> If I instantiate a subclass of Persistent, but I don't ever assign
>>> it
>>> as an attribute on the root (or any other Persistent instance) ...
>>> then what happen
Jim Fulton wrote:
> On Nov 14, 2008, at 6:16 PM, Paul Winkler wrote:
>
>> If I instantiate a subclass of Persistent, but I don't ever assign it
>> as an attribute on the root (or any other Persistent instance) ...
>> then what happens to my instance when the transaction commits?
>>
>> A) it's save
On Nov 14, 2008, at 6:16 PM, Paul Winkler wrote:
> If I instantiate a subclass of Persistent, but I don't ever assign it
> as an attribute on the root (or any other Persistent instance) ...
> then what happens to my instance when the transaction commits?
>
> A) it's saved in the ZODB, but not rea