On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 12:33 AM, Tim Godfrey t...@obsidian.com.au wrote:
Hi Jim
Do you have any idea as to why people recommend against many storages under
a single Zeo?
Seriously?
Go back and read the thread.
Also can increasing the invalidation-queue-size help this if
there is memory
On 25 October 2012 00:13, Jim Fulton j...@zope.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 12:33 AM, Tim Godfrey t...@obsidian.com.au wrote:
Hi Jim
Do you have any idea as to why people recommend against many storages
under
a single Zeo?
Seriously?
Go back and read the thread.
Seriously
On 2012-10-25 00:11:40 +, Tim Godfrey said:
On 25 October 2012 00:13, Jim Fulton j...@zope.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 12:33 AM, Tim Godfrey t...@obsidian.com.au wrote:
Hi Jim
Do you have any idea as to why people recommend against many storages under
a single Zeo?
Seriously?
Patience goes both ways.
Thanks for your help
Tim
On 25 October 2012 12:33, Alex Clark acl...@aclark.net wrote:
**
On 2012-10-25 00:11:40 +, Tim Godfrey said:
On 25 October 2012 00:13, Jim Fulton j...@zope.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 12:33 AM, Tim Godfrey
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 12:33 AM, Tim Godfrey t...@obsidian.com.au
wrote:
Hi Jim
Do you have any idea as to why people recommend against many storages
under
a single Zeo?
Seriously?
Go back and read the thread.
Seriously mate. The why is very vague.
There is nothing vague
Hi Jim
Do you have any idea as to why people recommend against many storages under
a single Zeo? Also can increasing the invalidation-queue-size help this if
there is memory to spare on the machine?
Tim
On 23 October 2012 00:53, Jim Fulton j...@zope.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 8:48 PM,
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 8:48 PM, Tim Godfrey t...@obsidian.com.au wrote:
Hi Jon
Thanks for your response. Is that something that has been done in a later
version of Zeoserver than mine (ZODB3-3.10.3)?
No. Every time I've tried to switch to poll in a asyncore, I've had problems.
It this
Hi Jon
Thanks for your response. Is that something that has been done in a later
version of Zeoserver than mine (ZODB3-3.10.3)?
It this your recommended action for the issue I'm having or are there still
some configuration changes I can make?
Tim
On 20 October 2012 19:52, Jon Dyte
On 18/10/12 03:29, Tim Godfrey wrote:
Hi all
We have a customer on Plone 4.1 and recently we started to see a great
increase in the number of open file descriptors the Zeoserver process
uses.
We have a pretty big system distributed over many servers as the Plone
system gets a lot of
Having a single ZEO server handling more than one or two storages is
not usually a good idea. ZEO does not handle each storage in a
separate thread, so you're underusing multiple CPUs if you have them.
Multiple ZEO servers would also spread the open sockets among them.
There could still be a
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Leonardo Rochael Almeida
leoroch...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for pitching in with an answer!
Having a single ZEO server handling more than one or two storages is
not usually a good idea. ZEO does not handle each storage in a
separate thread, so you're
Hi
Thanks for your responses thus far.
For the most part the zeoserver is performing quite well. Very low memory
and CPU usage.
I really think my problem lies in the fact that the Zope clients are
reporting these sort of messages quite regularly when communicating to ZEO:
2012-10-19T10:15:02
12 matches
Mail list logo
