Hello,
I've running chroot environment (only apache, php and mysql)on Solaris
10u5 and I want this environment move to ZONE environment.
Problem is with packages because zoneadm install all packages from
global ZONE.
Is there only way that I install this ZONE and after installing ZONE
remove
Maciej Browarski wrote:
Hello,
I've running chroot environment (only apache, php and mysql)on Solaris
10u5 and I want this environment move to ZONE environment.
Problem is with packages because zoneadm install all packages from
global ZONE.
Is there only way that I install this ZONE and
I'm looking for reviewers for '6613349 setuid not allowed message
could be more useful'. I've tested it on a b101 system without any
issues. It's pretty straightforward (and small) -- just modifying the
message to display the filesystem path (instead of the device number)
and making it zone
I'm looking for reviewers for '6613349 setuid not allowed message
could be more useful'. I've tested it on a b101 system without any
issues. It's pretty straightforward (and small) -- just modifying the
message to display the filesystem path (instead of the device number)
and making it zone
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 12:46 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm looking for reviewers for '6613349 setuid not allowed message
could be more useful'. I've tested it on a b101 system without any
issues. It's pretty straightforward (and small) -- just modifying the
message to display the
Well, I forgot to mention that we were using S10u6, but the idea I had was to
apply the filter rules in the global zone. As far as I can tell, crossbow is
not integrated with NV or OS either :)
It looks like we are going to need to somehow wrapper it, or put the entire
ipf.conf for all zones
Start with a real minimal build of Solaris, build a sparse zone. The zones then
take ~200MB. No, its not a CHROOT, but you can chroot apps that support it
(named) within the zone so that there is absolutely nothing that can be
accessed if it somehow is broken... but the minimal install should
I have about 50-60 zones spread across 3 security contexts ;)
~tommy
On Nov 12, 2008, at 6:38 PM, Ha Bailey wrote:
Have you considered Trusted Extensions? As long as you do not need
multiple zones of the same security context on the same physical
server, it might work out for you. (in
Steffen Weiberle wrote:
On 10/20/08 10:58, Joe Barbey wrote:
Hi all,
I've got a situation that doesn't seem to be really covered in the
various docs I've read up to now. I have a number of servers where I
want to do something like the following, if possible. Any help would
be greatly
Hi all,
I'm pleased to read I'm not the sole victim of what I'm calling
the solaris zone route bug.
Please take a look below to my comment.
Le 10 nov. 08 à 17:51, Tommy McNeely a écrit :
On Nov 10, 2008, at 7:09 AM, Paul Kraus wrote:
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 10:34 PM, Tommy
10 matches
Mail list logo
