For this config, HW RAID is a non-negotiable requirement and SVM cannot
be used to mirror the internal drives. It comes from a historic aversion
toward the old SDS (Disksuite Suite).
Paul
Mike Gerdts wrote:
On 2/6/07, Paul Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SVM with soft partitions is not an
Thanks,
ZFS wouldn't appear to be an option here as we are only dealing with a
pair of internal disks with no SAN-attached storage.
Paul
John Clingan wrote:
That's where you want to use zfs datasets. Push a dataset to each zone and mount zone-local bits, data and logs to filesystems
On 2/7/07, Paul Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For this config, HW RAID is a non-negotiable requirement and SVM cannot
be used to mirror the internal drives. It comes from a historic aversion
toward the old SDS (Disksuite Suite).
You can use soft partitions on top of hardware RAID. Suppose
Hi...
I'm getting ready to apply the latest recommenced patch cluster to my system. I
have several sparse root zones as well. I see where the latest version of patch
119254, fixes a lot of issues with patching zones. Is is best to stop all
applications running on the zone (Oracle Apps
Hello,
recently I had discussion with our DBA about Oracle
DISM in zones. I had
remembered that it wasn't possible to use it inside
local zone
and started looking for docs which can be read by the
DBA.
While looking for it I encountered (again because I
had read it before)
zones FAQ at
Hi all,
Last time I checked, having one's zone roots (zonepaths) on
ZFS file systems was not a recommended practice, despite the
fact that this works. IIRC, the problem was that the upgrade
code didn't grok zfs and would therefore get terribly confused
should the zone roots reside on ZFS.
Rich,
Rich Teer wrote:
Hi all,
Last time I checked, having one's zone roots (zonepaths) on
ZFS file systems was not a recommended practice, despite the
fact that this works. IIRC, the problem was that the upgrade
code didn't grok zfs and would therefore get terribly confused
should the zone
Jerry Jelinek wrote:
Rich,
Rich Teer wrote:
Hi all,
Last time I checked, having one's zone roots (zonepaths) on
ZFS file systems was not a recommended practice, despite the
fact that this works. IIRC, the problem was that the upgrade
code didn't grok zfs and would therefore get terribly
John Clingan wrote:
This is incorrect. All S10 updates have supported upgrading systems
with zones. I believe what you are thinking of is that live-upgrade
does not support upgrading systems with zones. This is being
fixed in the next S10 update. It is already fixed in nevada.
Which Nevada
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Jerry Jelinek wrote:
This is incorrect. All S10 updates have supported upgrading systems
with zones. I believe what you are thinking of is that live-upgrade
does not support upgrading systems with zones. This is being
fixed in the next S10 update. It is already fixed
Do you know which nevada build that will be?
Thanks!
John Clingan
Sun Microsystems
Sent from mobile phone.
-Original Message-
From: Lori Alt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj: Re: [zones-discuss] Re: [zfs-discuss] Downsides to zone roots on ZFS?
Date: Wed Feb 7, 2007 2:51 pm
Size: 1K
To:
div id=jive-html-wrapper-div
br
Thanks,br
br
ZFS wouldn't appear to be an option here as we are
only dealing with a
pair of internal disks with no SAN-attached
storage.br
br
Not sure why SAN would be required.
All you need is free space, and internal disks are fine. Just create a
Sure, good point. I forgot about the possibility of using a single
slice in a ZFS pool. Could be an option here.
Paul
Darren Dunham wrote:
div id="jive-html-wrapper-div"
br
Thanks,br
br
ZFS wouldn't appear to be an option here as we are
only dealing with a
pair of internal disks
Folks,
IHAC who want to confiigure 4 zones to running weblogic 8.1 with below
hardware configuration.
1 x E4900 with 1 USIV+ 1.5G SB, 2 x 146G internal disks.
Customer reqiure average CPU/Mem resource into 4 zones.
Very apprecivate for any advice or best practice for this requirement.
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Jerry Jelinek wrote:
Just to be clear, both live-upgrade and the mini-root upgrade
do not yet know about zfs so if you place your zones on zfs,
you won't be able to do either style of upgrade until that is fixed.
Understood; that won't be an issue for me.
Many thanks for
Is this true for OpenSolaris? My experience:
I was trying to upgrade from SunOS 5.11 snv_28 to SunOS 5.11 snv_54 where
my NGZ zone roots were set to a zfs mount point like below:
NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT
zpool 93.8G 40.1G26K /zpool
zpool/zones
16 matches
Mail list logo
