It isn't a deficiency in the zones virtualisation model. In fact it is a
deliberate design goal
that zones NOT have such a high level of privielge available to them. The
reason you can't
create pools in a zone is because they don't have access to the privielges to
do so.
If you really need
Virtualisation.
They appear to me to be more about advocacy or system admin and
providing prebuilt try out solutions rather than how viritualisation
is actually implemented which would be the major focus of a
Virtualisation community.
--
Darren J Moffat
are available to all zones, in particular each
zone that is an NFS server maybe in a different Kerberos REALM.
--
Darren J Moffat
___
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
stack instances)
then the global zone must not be able to share out the zones filesystems.
--
Darren J Moffat
___
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 12:28:40AM +, Darren J Moffat wrote:
Nicolas Williams wrote:
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 03:27:30PM -0600, Robert Gordon wrote:
There maybe a conflicting security requirement here. Lets say
I'm SA of the zone and i have exported /export/foo
Brad Diggs wrote:
* Switched from CDDL license to GPLv2.
I'm curious why did the license switch to GPLv2 ?
--
Darren J Moffat
___
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
of reasonable ? I think that being a
default should be part of the case.
--
Darren J Moffat
___
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss@opensolaris.org