Re: [zones-discuss] Branded zones and external hardware

2010-08-05 Thread Jerry Jelinek
On 08/05/10 07:03, joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote: Frank Batschulat (Home)frank.batschu...@sun.com wrote: the problem with exporting the tape device to a NGZ, which although not supported can be achived as you mention, is that there's no way to exclusive assign that particular tape

Re: [zones-discuss] Can a guest LDOM discover the identity of the host system?

2010-07-02 Thread Jerry Jelinek
On 07/02/10 13:47, Richard L. Hamilton wrote: That is...is there a mechanism provided to do this? As an afterthought, this also applies to non-global zones, although one can stick something in the oem-banner eeprom variable that is identically visible on all the zones, which is not the case on

Re: [zones-discuss] Duplicating zones ??

2010-06-30 Thread Jerry Jelinek
On 06/30/10 04:34, Warren Zeeman wrote: Hello, IHAC who wants to duplicate a global zone, as a zone on another server !!! Does anybody have any thoughts on the easiest way to achieve this ? We call this p2v (physical to virtual). Its been in opensolaris for quite a while now, so if you

Re: [zones-discuss] booting zone after system restart fails with ERROR: no active dataset

2010-06-01 Thread Jerry Jelinek
On 05/30/10 16:45, Ian Collins wrote: I've tracked down the cause. It was my backup copy of the zone ZFS tree on another pool: backup/zoneRoot 1.64G 89.3G 26K /backup/zoneRoot backup/zoneRoot/svn 439M 89.3G 24K /backup/zoneRoot/svn backup/zoneRoot/svn/ROOT 439M 89.3G 21K legacy

Re: [zones-discuss] booting zone after system restart fails with ERROR: no active dataset

2010-05-28 Thread Jerry Jelinek
On 05/26/10 17:14, Ian Collins wrote: I have just restarted a b133 host with several zones and no none of them will boot. They all report: # zoneadm -z svn boot zone 'svn': ERROR: no active dataset. zone 'svn': zoneadm: zone 'svn': call to zoneadmd failed I've seen this mentioned as an issue

Re: [zones-discuss] booting zone after system restart fails with ERROR: no active dataset

2010-05-28 Thread Jerry Jelinek
On 05/28/10 15:16, Ian Collins wrote: On 05/29/10 12:25 AM, Jerry Jelinek wrote: On 05/26/10 17:14, Ian Collins wrote: I have just restarted a b133 host with several zones and no none of them will boot. They all report: # zoneadm -z svn boot zone 'svn': ERROR: no active dataset. zone 'svn

Re: [zones-discuss] impossible to attach migrated zone to a new server

2010-05-19 Thread Jerry Jelinek
On 05/19/10 12:47, Philippe Bürgisser wrote: Hi, I followed the guide (http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-2450/gcgnc?l=ena=view) from sun to move a working zone into a new server with the same configuration. I executed those commands : tar xf myzone.tar -- to /export/zones/myzone zonecfg

Re: [zones-discuss] update from 111b to 134

2010-03-17 Thread Jerry Jelinek
On 03/17/10 08:21 AM, Piotr Jasiukajtis wrote: Hi, After upgrade from 111b to b134 non local zone is not able to run properly. Was this a newly installed zone or one that existed from before the upgrade? If it was a pre-existing zone, did you upgrade the software inside the zone to be in

Re: [zones-discuss] update from 111b to 134

2010-03-17 Thread Jerry Jelinek
On 03/17/10 09:16 AM, Piotr Jasiukajtis wrote: The zone was installed and running before the update. System was upgraded by using 'pkg image-update'. No different actions ware done. In that case, the zone is in an undefined state and unusable. See:

Re: [zones-discuss] Help, my zone's dataset has disappeared!

2010-02-26 Thread Jerry Jelinek
On 02/26/10 07:03, Jesse Reynolds wrote: Hello I have an amd64 server running OpenSolaris 2009-06. In December I created one container on this server named 'cpmail' with it's own zfs dataset and it's been running ever since. Until earlier this evening when the server did a kernel panic and

Re: [zones-discuss] Help, my zone's dataset has disappeared!

2010-02-26 Thread Jerry Jelinek
On 02/26/10 07:37, Jerry Jelinek wrote: On 02/26/10 07:03, Jesse Reynolds wrote: Hello I have an amd64 server running OpenSolaris 2009-06. In December I created one container on this server named 'cpmail' with it's own zfs dataset and it's been running ever since. Until earlier this evening

Re: [zones-discuss] Help, my zone's dataset has disappeared!

2010-02-26 Thread Jerry Jelinek
On 02/26/10 07:56, Jesse Reynolds wrote: Thanks Jerry! Yes, dataset=mailtmp looks wrong. I guess it's possible I altered the configuration and hadn't rebooted it. So, assuming that the manifest is out of date or wrong, what's the best way to fix it? Can I edit /etc/zones/cpmail.xml directly,

Re: [zones-discuss] minor code review for 6890415 6880288 (zoneadm.c, native brand)

2010-02-22 Thread Jerry Jelinek
On 02/22/10 09:40, Frank Batschulat (Home) wrote: May I have 2 code reviewers for the following minor changes for: PSARC/2010/008 Remove zoneadm install sub-option -x nodataset 6880288 retire zoneadm install -x nodataset option 6890415 zoneadm install fails but returns 0

Re: [zones-discuss] codereview for 6914152 (zonecfg)

2010-02-19 Thread Jerry Jelinek
On 02/19/10 06:53, Frank Batschulat (Home) wrote: May I request 2 code reviewers for the changes for: 6914152 zonecfg fails when less(1M) is missing http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6914152 http://cr.opensolaris.org/~batschul/zpager/ Frank, This looks fine to me.

Re: [zones-discuss] codereview for 6914152 (zonecfg)

2010-02-19 Thread Jerry Jelinek
On 02/19/10 11:32, Frank Batschulat (Home) wrote: Thanks Jerry, that is indeed a valid concern, I changed it to be: snip PAGER /usr/bin/nonsense does not exist (No such file or directory). snip end I included the real error string in case of permission errors where the file does indeed exist

Re: [zones-discuss] 6715679 - update on attach handling of /etc/release

2010-01-28 Thread Jerry Jelinek
On 01/27/10 12:30, Marcel Hofstetter wrote: Jerry Jelinek wrote: usr/src/lib/brand/native/zone/sw_support.c 1115 1116 } else if (strcmp(buf, SUNW_PKG_ALL_ZONES) == 0) { 1117 infop-zpi_all_zones = B_TRUE; 1118 My thought

Re: [zones-discuss] Downgrading zones on Opensolaris 2009.x ( b131)

2010-01-25 Thread Jerry Jelinek
On 01/25/10 04:30, Paul van der Zwan wrote: I have upgraded my Opensolaris system to b131 and followed the zoneadm detach/attach -u procedure to upgrade my zones to b131 as well. Unfortunately I am running into bug 6912829 ( causes panic on zoneadm halt ) quite often. Downgrading the global

Re: [zones-discuss] Downgrading zones on Opensolaris 2009.x ( b131)

2010-01-25 Thread Jerry Jelinek
On 01/25/10 06:12, Paul van der Zwan wrote: Ok that’s what I did. Detach first and then the image-update. I saw a workaround for the panics so downgrading may be less important, but I’ll have to change my procedure the next update. Do you know of an ‘official’ zones/beadm/image-update doc that

Re: [zones-discuss] why are zone datasets mounted when no zone is running ?

2010-01-22 Thread Jerry Jelinek
On 01/22/10 04:57, Frank Batschulat (Home) wrote: Hiya, I observed that zone datasets are mounted even though no zones are running. this strikes me like a bug ? aren't they supposed to be mounted only when the zone boots ? No, it was a bug that they weren't mounted except when the zone was

Re: [zones-discuss] Problem creating a new zone in svn_130

2010-01-21 Thread Jerry Jelinek
On 01/20/10 15:01, Johan Hedin wrote: Hi all I'm trying to create a new zone in OpenSolaris svn_130. r...@dom0:~# zonecfg -z test info zonename: test zonepath: /internal/zone/test brand: ipkg autoboot: false bootargs: pool: limitpriv: scheduling-class: ip-type: shared hostid: net:

Re: [zones-discuss] SXCE b130 zoneadm attach -u error

2010-01-19 Thread Jerry Jelinek
On 01/18/10 19:25, Karl Rossing wrote: I made the change as per http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6905313 What changes? As of this morning the bug has no workaround or suggested fix listed? I'm still getting the following error: bash-4.0# zoneadm -z model attach

Re: [zones-discuss] zones code review

2010-01-19 Thread Jerry Jelinek
On 01/19/10 14:00, Edward Pilatowicz wrote: perhaps it would make sense to add some tokens to the comments in brand_asm.h like: 32-BIT INTERPOSITION STACK 32-BIT LCALL/INT STACK 64-BIT INTERPOSITION STACK 64-BIT LCALL/INT STACK and then in the comments

[zones-discuss] zones code review

2010-01-14 Thread Jerry Jelinek
I need a code review for my proposed fix for: 6887823 brandz on x86 should ignore %gs and simplify brand hooks There is a webrev at: http://cr.opensolaris.org/~gjelinek/webrev.6887823/ This simplifies some of the handling for the %gs register, cleans up the interfaces with the brand modules,

Re: [zones-discuss] Webrev for CR 6909222

2010-01-04 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Jordan Vaughan wrote: I need someone to review my fix for 6909222 reboot of system upgraded from 128 to build 129 generated error from an s10 zone due to boot-archive My webrev is accessible via http://cr.opensolaris.org/~flippedb/onnv-s10c Jordan, This looks ok to me but don't we need

Re: [zones-discuss] Webrev for CR 6909222

2010-01-04 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Jordan Vaughan wrote: On 01/ 4/10 07:26 AM, Jerry Jelinek wrote: Jordan Vaughan wrote: I need someone to review my fix for 6909222 reboot of system upgraded from 128 to build 129 generated error from an s10 zone due to boot-archive My webrev is accessible via http://cr.opensolaris.org

Re: [zones-discuss] Webrev for CR 6909222

2010-01-04 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Jordan Vaughan wrote: On 01/ 4/10 09:54 AM, Jerry Jelinek wrote: Jordan Vaughan wrote: On 01/ 4/10 07:26 AM, Jerry Jelinek wrote: Jordan Vaughan wrote: I need someone to review my fix for 6909222 reboot of system upgraded from 128 to build 129 generated error from an s10 zone due to boot

Re: [zones-discuss] Webrev for CR 6909222

2010-01-04 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Jordan Vaughan wrote: Maybe I'm not understanding the bug's evaluation but it seems to say that the problem is caused by the presence of boot archive files. Jerry Jerry, It is. However, bootadm(1M) infers the existence of boot archives from the existence of

Re: [zones-discuss] zones code review

2009-12-19 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Edward Pilatowicz wrote: so we're actually changing our stack pointer after entry into the kernel, so it's no longer necessarily matching the interrupt stack that the processor switched in automatically and saved the parameters on. notably we don't do this for 32-bit kernels. this means that

Re: [zones-discuss] zones code review

2009-12-18 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Edward Pilatowicz wrote: so now you have: ---8--- #define V_U_EIP (CLONGSIZE * 0) ... GET_V(%rsp, 1, V_SSP, %rax) /* get saved stack pointer */ SET_V(%rax, 0, V_U_EIP, %r15) /* save new return addr in %eip */ ---8--- but why can't this be identical to the 32-bit

Re: [zones-discuss] zones code review

2009-12-18 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Jerry Jelinek wrote: Because its not right above, all of the other register values are also pushed on the stack, so we need to go through the SSP to get to the right spot. I can add a comment explaining this but the 32bit and 64bit stacks are not identical. Ed, Actually, what I said above

Re: [zones-discuss] zones code review

2009-12-17 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Edward Pilatowicz wrote: - CALC_TABLE_ADDR() a little clunky. (it has seperate 32 and 64 versions, it assumes the syscall number is in eax/rax, and it has a side effect of munging the syscall number.) how about defining just one version of CALC_TABLE_ADDR() as: ---8--- #define

Re: [zones-discuss] zones code review

2009-12-17 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Edward Pilatowicz wrote: On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 09:39:34AM -0700, Jerry Jelinek wrote: Edward Pilatowicz wrote: - CALC_TABLE_ADDR() a little clunky. (it has seperate 32 and 64 versions, it assumes the syscall number is in eax/rax, and it has a side effect of munging the syscall number

Re: [zones-discuss] code review for 6495558

2009-12-17 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Frank Batschulat (Home) wrote: Hey Ed, Steve, Jordan, Jerry, I got it in writing from Veritas Engineering that they do not have any heartburn over using fsck -o p on VxFS and inside the zone and also by testing in the lab I confirmed it behaves as expected and similar to UFS: snip end # uname

Re: [zones-discuss] zones code review

2009-12-16 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Jordan Vaughan wrote: -- usr/src/lib/brand/sn1/sn1_brand/amd64/sn1_handler.s 44: Shouldn't this function be named sn1_handler_table? Jordan, Good catch, I'll fix that. Thanks, Jerry ___ zones-discuss mailing list

Re: [zones-discuss] zones code review

2009-12-16 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Ed, I've posted an updated webrev to address your comments. http://cr.opensolaris.org/~gjelinek/webrev.6768950/ Let me know if you have any other comments or see anything with the changes I made. Thanks, Jerry ___ zones-discuss mailing list

Re: [zones-discuss] cloning a zone from a snapshot

2009-12-16 Thread Jerry Jelinek
GüŸnther Schmidt wrote: Hello, I'd like to create a clone from a specific snapshot using zoneadm, but this feature seems to be broken in OSOL 2009.06. Is there another way of doing this? This is bug: 5940 Cannot create clone of zone from snapshot To workaround this you can make a clone

Re: [zones-discuss] zones code review

2009-12-16 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Ed, Edward Pilatowicz wrote: On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 10:46:57AM -0700, Jerry Jelinek wrote: Ed, I've posted an updated webrev to address your comments. http://cr.opensolaris.org/~gjelinek/webrev.6768950/ usr/src/uts/intel/brand/sn1/sn1_brand_asm.s - i'd think the is 0 = syscall = MAX

[zones-discuss] zones code review

2009-12-15 Thread Jerry Jelinek
I have an initial code review for the fix for bug: 6768950 panic[cpu1]/thread=ff084ce0b3e0: syscall_asm_amd64.s:480 lwp ff0756a8cdc0, pcb_rupdate != 0 There is a webrev at: http://cr.opensolaris.org/~gjelinek/webrev.6768950/ The code changes in the sn1 and solaris10 brands are

Re: [zones-discuss] zones code review

2009-12-15 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Ed, Thanks for reviewing this. My responses to your comments are in-line. Edward Pilatowicz wrote: On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 08:39:12AM -0700, Jerry Jelinek wrote: I have an initial code review for the fix for bug: 6768950 panic[cpu1]/thread=ff084ce0b3e0: syscall_asm_amd64.s:480

Re: [zones-discuss] code review for 6495558

2009-12-11 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Frank Batschulat (Home) wrote: friends, may I request code review for the earth-shattering fix to: 6495558 zoneadm -z zone boot should not only check but repair filesystems http://cr.opensolaris.org/~batschul/onnv-vplat/ backround: Evaluation when booting a zone, zoneadm ( ie.

Re: [zones-discuss] solaris 10 branded zone

2009-12-09 Thread Jerry Jelinek
xx wrote: i installed virtualbox and installed solaris 10 from an iso download. i used the flar command to create s10.flar as directed in: http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Community+Group+zones/s10brand_dev_guide i then tried to install s10.flar in the solaris 10 branded zone:

Re: [zones-discuss] why not just bury zoneadm [-x nodataset] option ?

2009-12-09 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Frank Batschulat (Home) wrote: friends, I went back and forth with th bug pertaining the [-x nodataset] option 6880288 zoneadm install -x nodataset option should be brand-specifc http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6880288 and eventually I decided to ask for quorum to

Re: [zones-discuss] solaris 10 branded zone

2009-12-09 Thread Jerry Jelinek
xx wrote: init...@dogpatch:/virtualbox# zoneadm -z csuite install -a ./s10.cpio -u WARNING: skipping network interface 'vnic0_3' which may not be present/plumbed in the global zone. A ZFS file system has been created for this zone. Log File: /var/tmp/csuite.install_log.79aGOA Error:

Re: [zones-discuss] Solaris10-Branded Zones Webrev: CR 6882732

2009-12-09 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Jordan Vaughan wrote: I need someone to review my fix for 6882732 unpacking archive with extended file attributes reports errors The webrev is accessible via http://cr.opensolaris.org/~flippedb/onnv-s10c Jordan, Nice job, this looks good to me. Thanks, Jerry

Re: [zones-discuss] Upgrade from 127 to 128a blew up all my zones

2009-12-08 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Robert Hartzell wrote: My normal procedure is to image-update, reboot, check that everything is working then update each zone. This has always worked because the zones would still be running. All my external services are running in zones (dns, smtp, http, ftp) so when I reboot I have no dns

Re: [zones-discuss] Upgrade from 127 to 128a blew up all my zones

2009-12-07 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Robert Hartzell wrote: I have upgraded 3 systems from 127 to 128a and all the zones basically have the same error. autofs is in maintenance with 17 dependent services not running. I haven't upgraded the zones because they are in production and don't want to have to recreate all 7 of them

Re: [zones-discuss] ERROR: no active dataset. w/ migration from Indiana snv_125 to Indiana snv_127

2009-11-30 Thread Jerry Jelinek
John D Groenveld wrote: In message 4b141dac.7060...@sun.com, Jerry Jelinek writes: The workaround for what? On snv_127, zfs receive does not mount the zbe and zoneadm attach fails until its mounted: # uname -v snv_127 # zfs receive -d rpool /var/tmp/foo.snapshot # zonecfg -z foo create

Re: [zones-discuss] quick bug fix webrev...

2009-11-20 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Edward Pilatowicz wrote: hey all, i need a review for the following bugfix: http://cr.opensolaris.org/~edp/onnv-zmount3/ 6901952 zoneadm fails with unable to determine default brand Ed, This looks fine to me. Jerry ___ zones-discuss mailing list

Re: [zones-discuss] one line webrev...

2009-11-04 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Edward Pilatowicz wrote: hey all, so with my recent zoneadm mount putback i broke the native brand on nevada. i've got a webrev with the one line fix here: http://cr.opensolaris.org/~edp/onnv-zmount2 6898056 native zones no longer boot: zone 'public': missing or invalid brand Ed, looks

Re: [zones-discuss] webrev for on-nightly zone install fix

2009-11-03 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Edward Pilatowicz wrote: hey all, i've got a webrev that needs review: http://cr.opensolaris.org/~edp/pkg-on-nightly/ it's a fix for: 11392 'zoneadm .. install' only uses preferred publisher http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=11392 this fix let's me

Re: [zones-discuss] restrcit physical memory with zone.max-locked-memory

2009-10-28 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Ketan wrote: Is it possible to restrict physical memory in solaris zone with zone.max-locked-memory just like we can do with rcapd ? I do not want to used rcapd No, locked memory is not the same thing as the total physical memory used by a zone. The only way to cap physical memory is with

[zones-discuss] solaris10 branded zone in b127

2009-10-23 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Yesterday we integrated support for solaris10 branded zones into ON. In case you're not watching the putback notifications, the heads-up message is here: http://onnv.sfbay.sun.com/links/flagdays/pages/2009102201.html We've divided this project up into phases, so whats there now is Phase I. It

Re: [zones-discuss] solaris10 branded zone in b127

2009-10-23 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Jerry Jelinek wrote: Yesterday we integrated support for solaris10 branded zones into ON. In case you're not watching the putback notifications, the heads-up message is here: http://onnv.sfbay.sun.com/links/flagdays/pages/2009102201.html Sorry, I posted an internal link here. The external

Re: [zones-discuss] s10 brand Phase I webrev

2009-10-06 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Ed, Thanks for reviewing this again. I took most of your input. For the questions you had or the things I didn't take, I have responded below. Edward Pilatowicz wrote: - could you propegate back your common changes to the original file? I don't want to complicate this project with the

Re: [zones-discuss] s10 brand Phase I webrev

2009-10-06 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Jordan, Thanks for reviewing this again. I took most of your input. For the things I didn't take, I have responded below. Jordan Vaughan wrote: usr/src/uts/common/brand/solaris10/s10_brand.c 1260-1261,1286-1287,1313,etc.: Couldn't we make arg1 a zoneid_t, arg2 an int, arg3 a char *, and

Re: [zones-discuss] s10 brand Phase I webrev

2009-10-06 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Ed, Edward Pilatowicz wrote: On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 09:47:40AM -0600, Jerry Jelinek wrote: Ed, Thanks for reviewing this again. I took most of your input. For the questions you had or the things I didn't take, I have responded below. Edward Pilatowicz wrote: - could you propegate back

Re: [zones-discuss] s10 brand Phase I webrev

2009-10-06 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Peter Memishian wrote: also, i would have though you'd commited to doing this work when you decided to fork the sn1 brand code instead of making it common. I was wondering about this too. Indeed, there seems be a sizeable amount of duplicated code now. Why is this the right design?

Re: [zones-discuss] s10 brand Phase I webrev

2009-10-06 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Ed, Edward Pilatowicz wrote: On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 12:15:23PM -0600, Jerry Jelinek wrote: Ed, Edward Pilatowicz wrote: On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 09:47:40AM -0600, Jerry Jelinek wrote: Ed, Thanks for reviewing this again. I took most of your input. For the questions you had or the things

Re: [zones-discuss] s10 brand Phase I webrev

2009-10-06 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Peter Memishian wrote: I was wondering about this too. Indeed, there seems be a sizeable amount of duplicated code now. Why is this the right design? Because the sn1 brand is an internal brand for testing and is not delivered to customers. Once the solaris10 brand is

Re: [zones-discuss] s10 brand Phase I webrev

2009-10-06 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Ed, Edward Pilatowicz wrote: really? i'd have to disagree. i was actually expecting that when nevada dies we'd have to update the sn1 brand to work on opensolaris. i always thought you forked the code because that was faster than re-factoring it to be common. No, that wasn't my thinking,

Re: [zones-discuss] s10 brand Phase I webrev

2009-10-05 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Jordan Vaughan wrote: I have a few nits and questions aside from Ed's. Jordan, Thanks for looking this over. I'll address these once I finish going through Ed's comments. Thanks again, Jerry ___ zones-discuss mailing list

Re: [zones-discuss] s10 brand Phase I webrev

2009-10-01 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Edward Pilatowicz wrote: i'm not done yet, but i've attached what i've got so far. Ed, Thanks for your comments. I'll start to work through these while we're waiting for the rest of your input and respond if there is anything we're not going to address. Thank again, Jerry

Re: [zones-discuss] updating zones question

2009-09-29 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Will Fiveash wrote: As an aside it would be nice if the pkg image-update command provided an option to update all zones configured in the BE being updated. There is no option because it will eventually do that automatically, just like upgrading s10 today will also upgrade all zones. We're

Re: [zones-discuss] s10 brand Phase I webrev

2009-09-29 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Edward Pilatowicz wrote: - also, since the s10 brand is derived from the sn1 brand, could you please ensure that all the new s10 brand that are being created are derived from the corresponding sn1 brand files? ie, the s10 brand files which are derived from sn1 brand files should be created via

Re: [zones-discuss] updating zones question

2009-09-28 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Will Fiveash wrote: This is in the FAQ. http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/zones/faq/#os I wish the info was more detailed/explicit. How do I use zones attach/detach to do an image-update on the zone exactly? # zoneadm -z myzone foo detach # zoneadm -z myzone foo attach -u Also I

Re: [zones-discuss] Ancestor filesystems writable by zone admin - by design?

2009-09-28 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Miles Benson wrote: Hi All, I'm not sure what I'm seeing is by design or by misconfiguration. I created a filesystem tank/zones to hold some zones, then created a specific zone filesystem tank/zones/basezone. Then built a zone, setting zonepath=/tank/zones/basezone. If I zlogin to

Re: [zones-discuss] Ancestor filesystems writable by zone admin - by design?

2009-09-28 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Miles Benson wrote: Hi Jerry, Ok, that makes sense. And I've checked and you're right, it's all in the non-global zone. My mistake and I'm glad I was wrong. However, I think the thing which set me off on the wrong track in the first place was the zfs list output showing the available space.

Re: [zones-discuss] s10 brand Phase I webrev

2009-09-28 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Edward Pilatowicz wrote: hey jerry, do you have an updated ws+webrev where the s10 files were created using hg cp? (i'm waiting for that before doing a review.) also, when were you planning to integrate? (so i can avoid a last minute rush.) Ed, I wasn't aware that this was holding you up.

Re: [zones-discuss] updating zones question

2009-09-28 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Will Fiveash wrote: On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 12:20:53PM -0600, Jerry Jelinek wrote: Will Fiveash wrote: This is in the FAQ. http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/zones/faq/#os I wish the info was more detailed/explicit. How do I use zones attach/detach to do an image-update on the zone

Re: [zones-discuss] updating zones question

2009-09-25 Thread Jerry Jelinek
William A. Fiveash wrote: My questions are: - Should the zones have been updated when I did the pkg -R /mnt image-update to BE opensolaris_123? - If not, how can I fix the zones so that when I boot them while running the opensolaris_123 BE they have 123 level packages and if

[zones-discuss] s10 brand Phase I webrev

2009-09-15 Thread Jerry Jelinek
We've completed the development for the Phase I work on the solaris10 brand. I've posted a full webrev at: http://cr.opensolaris.org/~gjelinek/webrev.646/ Let me know if there are any comments. Thanks, Jerry ___ zones-discuss mailing list

Re: [zones-discuss] s10 brand Phase I webrev

2009-09-15 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Peter Memishian wrote: We've completed the development for the Phase I work on the solaris10 brand. I've posted a full webrev at: http://cr.opensolaris.org/~gjelinek/webrev.646/ Let me know if there are any comments. I see that ip-type=exclusive is regarded as experimental

Re: [zones-discuss] Zones patching issues using attach -u

2009-09-15 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Gael wrote: Hello I have been experimenting a few ways to speed up patching a bunch of machines running whole zones (parallel patching, zoneadm attach -u). I have encountered one issue with the attach -u way... Before initiating a case with sun, I was wondering if it was a well known issue...

Re: [zones-discuss] folding brandz into zones on os.o

2009-09-14 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Edward Pilatowicz wrote: hey all, just a quick heads up. it's been on my todo list for a very long time (and i figured that i really should get it done before the xwiki migration), so i finally merged all the brandz community content into the zones community. you can see all the moved content

[zones-discuss] prebuilt solaris 10 container pkgs

2009-07-10 Thread Jerry Jelinek
I've uploaded prebuilt SVr4 pkgs onto the project page for the solaris10 brand that we're building. http://opensolaris.org/os/project/s10brand/ I'll do this from now on as we sync to each nevada build. The current pkgs are meant to be used with b118. The OpenSolaris dev repository should be

Re: [zones-discuss] Preconfiguring ipkg Brand Zones

2009-07-07 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Brian Leonard wrote: I've been struggling to use the sysidcfg file to preconfigure my zones in 2009.06. I've read a couple of other posts where folks have also struggled (http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=307290, http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=319155).

Re: [zones-discuss] What is the status of zones on OpenSolaris?

2009-06-24 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Ben wrote: Hi all, I have an OpenSolaris server (home server for file serving and SunRay) and am currently virtualising OpenSolaris inside VirtualBox to segregate applications. This is a little resource intensive and I'd like to look at zones as an alternative. Last time I talked to an

Re: [zones-discuss] What is the status of zones on OpenSolaris?

2009-06-24 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Jerry Jelinek wrote: ... added for the next release. To work around this, the easiest thing to do is to detach and reattach each zone using the 'update on attach' option (-a) which will cause the zone to be updated to be in sync with the global zone. Sorry for the typo, the option is -u

[zones-discuss] s10 brand code review

2009-06-15 Thread Jerry Jelinek
I need a code review for the fix for: ssh dumping core on maramba There is a webrev at: http://cr.opensolaris.org/~gjelinek/webrev.crypto/ Thanks, Jerry ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [zones-discuss] s10 brand code review

2009-06-15 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Ed, Thanks for reviewing this. Edward Pilatowicz wrote: - you might want to add the crypto libraries to the list of libraries to watch for breakage. ;) Yep. :-) I'm also going to try to see if any of the other default devices that are inside of a zone might have had their ioctl params

Re: [zones-discuss] s10 brand code review

2009-06-15 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Jordan Vaughan wrote: I have a few nits. Some of them (such at [3]) might be ridiculously trivial, so I won't complain if you don't take them into account. Jordan, Thanks for reviewing this. I'll make all of the simplifications you suggested. Thanks again, Jerry

Re: [zones-discuss] Newbie: Just upgraded from 2008.11 to 2009.06 and zones fail to boot

2009-06-12 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Ian wrote: Hiya, I've just upgraded my 2008.11 system but the only way I could get it to upgrade was by detaching all my zones or beadm refused to create a new BE. Now that I'm in 2009.06, I used zoneadm -z web attach -F and I can see the zone claims to be installed when using zoneadm list

Re: [zones-discuss] Capped memory for zone

2009-05-31 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Ketan wrote: whats the difference between setting zone capped-memory from zoncfg and setting rctl: name: zone.max-locked-memory .. if changed the zone.max-locked-memory with prctl it does not change in rcapstat .. but if change with rcapadm it reflects in rcapstat o/p The capped-memory

[zones-discuss] solaris10 brand source code

2009-05-27 Thread Jerry Jelinek
I have posted the current source for the solaris10 brand on the project page at: http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/s10brand/ This source is synced to ONNV b116. Its a compressed tar archive which you can unpack into an ONNV workspace which has been synced to b116. If anyone has any

Re: [zones-discuss] S10 brand spec.

2009-05-26 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Peter Memishian wrote: Part 2: solaris10 Brand The solaris10 brand is conceptually similar to the existing solaris8 and solaris9 brands and builds directly on the BrandZ infrastructure that was created to support the lx brand. Familiarity with BrandZ

Re: [zones-discuss] pkg install AMP in a sparse zone

2009-05-18 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Devin Ceartas wrote: Yikes! Seriously, no sparse zones? That wasn't in the Bible book I don't think. This is a pretty big deal! Is this list the best place to follow to learn such things? Yes, this has been discussed on this alias in the past. Also, Dan Price blogged about this here:

Re: [zones-discuss] pkg install AMP in a sparse zone

2009-05-18 Thread Jerry Jelinek
gz wrote: Double Yiekes!!. All my customers use an SOE of sparce zones (With Solaris 10 of course) so if that is really the case it will be a problem for them to migrate to OpenSolaris if/when that becomes neccessary. Something like this could have serious concequences down the track and

Re: [zones-discuss] pkg install AMP in a sparse zone

2009-05-18 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Devin Ceartas wrote: The problems this may cause me are largely theoretical at this point, as I'm just beginning to ramp my OpenSolaris use up. My concern is conserving RAM, which full vs. sparse zones may or may not effect, I don't know, and with ease of management. My use case is running

Re: [zones-discuss] pkg install AMP in a sparse zone

2009-05-18 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Hung-Sheng Tsao wrote: guess is that the memory sharing benefits of sparse zones are relatively small in most cases. May be I am wrong here, it seems that with sparse zone and single binary for all zone there must be same memory sharing!!! I don't know what single binary you are talking

Re: [zones-discuss] pkg install AMP in a sparse zone

2009-05-18 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Steffen Weiberle wrote: I have been doing all on Solaris next testing using Nevada, as all the tools I know work, and my understanding of installation and configuration applies to that as well as Solaris 10. Now I am playing with 2009.06 and some 'simple' things don't work as expected. I

Re: [zones-discuss] pkg install AMP in a sparse zone

2009-05-18 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Christine Tran wrote: On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Jerry Jelinek gerald.jeli...@sun.com wrote: Thanks for the write-up. It is helpful for us to know what peoples concerns are for the sparse vs. whole root configurations. Our application make and destroy zones as needed. We've built up

Re: [zones-discuss] pkg install AMP in a sparse zone

2009-05-18 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Steffen Weiberle wrote: I originally could only imagine the reason for not doing the mounts when the zone is not booted is to avoid a huge set of ZFS mounts for zones that are not running. However, I see three ZFS file systems for a zone, and this is without any Live Upgrade (beadm) operation.

Re: [zones-discuss] pkg install AMP in a sparse zone

2009-05-18 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Peter Tribble wrote: The key advantage of using sparse-root is that there's only one OS to manage. With whole-root zones, and other heavier solutions, there's an extra OS image to manage with each virtual system. From an admin perspective, whole-root zones offer no real advantage over

[zones-discuss] Upgrading solaris10 branded zones

2009-05-18 Thread Jerry Jelinek
I've been spending some time researching ideas for how we could upgrade Solaris 10 once its installed in a solaris10 branded zone on S.next. We won't need this capability until S10u9 is released, but I want to make sure we do whatever we need to do now in order to enable this for the future. I

Re: [zones-discuss] Upgrading solaris10 branded zones

2009-05-18 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Enda O'Connor wrote: d) This is complex, legacy code which is a hairball. that is the mild way of putting it, this code is a tangle of scripts and some C code, it took a a lot of work to iron out the issues that the zones on zfs + sparc new boot features introduced in u6 prior to

Re: [zones-discuss] S10 brand spec.

2009-05-13 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Ellard Roush wrote: Hi Jerry, This document provides a lot of useful information. The section solaris10 Brand: What's Not Emulated you repeat some old information that is no longer correct. One point to note is that TX will continue to be incompatible with branded zones. That statement

[zones-discuss] S10 brand spec.

2009-05-12 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Enclosed is a first draft of a spec. for the S10 brand which we plan to submit for a PSARC inception review. Please send us any comments or questions. Thanks, Jerry --- S10C: A Solaris 10 Branded Zone for Solaris.Next Gerald Jelinek, Jordan Vaughan

Re: [zones-discuss] S10 brand spec.

2009-05-12 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Hernan Saltiel wrote: Hi! Will there be an adoption toolkit, to let the people use the S10 brand while testing it, and starting the migration process? I'm not sure I understand the question. Are you asking if the source code will be available before S.next is released? If so, then yes, we're

Re: [zones-discuss] S10 brand spec.

2009-05-12 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Hernan Saltiel wrote: No, I'm talking about the Solaris migration toolkit, available in the past to certify pre-Solaris 10 binaries against the new versions. They were a couple of Perl scripts (solcat, for example). They were a binary interface certification set of scripts. They were a good

Re: [zones-discuss] S10 brand spec.

2009-05-12 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Menno Lageman wrote: Thanks, that clears it up. Adding some text at the start of the Versioning section that newer versions of the brand will provide compatibility for older versions of the brand would help I think. Thanks, I'll add that clarification. Jerry

  1   2   3   4   >