[zones-discuss] Libraries not mounted in local zone

2006-10-18 Thread Bill Casale
Is there a reason the hardware optimized libraries shouldn't be mounted in a local zone? In the local zone, they are 0 byte files: bash-3.00# ls -l /platform/sun4u-us3/lib/libc_psr.so.1 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root bin0 May 25 09:35 /platform/sun4u-us3/lib/libc_psr.so.1 even though

Re: [zones-discuss] Libraries not mounted in local zone

2006-10-18 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Bill Casale wrote: Is there a reason the hardware optimized libraries shouldn't be mounted in a local zone? They should be. This was bug 6407767 libc_psr does not get mounted in a zone which was integrated into b41. What build are you running? Jerry

Re: [zones-discuss] Libraries not mounted in local zone

2006-10-18 Thread Bill Casale
Hi Jerry, Thanks for your reply, I did see that bug but this is happening on a V440 running Solaris 10 1/06 with KU 118833-23. Bill Jerry Jelinek wrote: Bill Casale wrote: Is there a reason the hardware optimized libraries shouldn't be mounted in a local zone? They should be. This was

Re: [zones-discuss] Libraries not mounted in local zone

2006-10-18 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Bill Casale wrote: Hi Jerry, Thanks for your reply, I did see that bug but this is happening on a V440 running Solaris 10 1/06 with KU 118833-23. It looks like this was also fixed in S10u3 build 4. I am not sure if it is in a patch yet. Jerry ___