Re: [zones-discuss] Re: Zone in a mounted state ?

2006-09-06 Thread Jeff Victor
Dick Davies wrote: On 05/09/06, Enda o'Connor - Sun Microsystems Ireland - Software Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Pierre Klovsjo wrote: Enda, You and James gave me the hint's needed with LD_LIBRARY_PATH settings, shell settings and the NFS information. I logged in with an empty

Re: [zones-discuss] Re: Zone in a mounted state ?

2006-09-06 Thread Dick Davies
On 06/09/06, Jeff Victor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: According to the inline doc, execution can only get there if the zone's root is mounted on $ZONEPATH/lu. I've never used liveupgrade (is that what 'lu' refers to?) but I saw this when a package install crapped out. Possibly $ZONEPATH/lu is

Re: [zones-discuss] Re: Zone in a mounted state ?

2006-09-06 Thread James Carlson
Dick Davies writes: On 06/09/06, Jeff Victor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: According to the inline doc, execution can only get there if the zone's root is mounted on $ZONEPATH/lu. I've never used liveupgrade (is that what 'lu' refers to?) Yes, originally. but I saw this when a package

[zones-discuss] ps -ef as non-root in global zone shows *all* processes

2006-09-06 Thread Dick Davies
I could have sworn a 'ps -ef' (as a non-privileged user) in the global zone only showed processes in the global zone. As of b46, that's no longer the case. Is the change intentional? -- Rasputin :: Jack of All Trades - Master of Nuns http://number9.hellooperator.net/

Re: [zones-discuss] ps -ef as non-root in global zone shows *all* processes

2006-09-06 Thread Jeff Victor
Dick Davies wrote: I could have sworn a 'ps -ef' (as a non-privileged user) in the global zone only showed processes in the global zone. I have never seen that, starting with pre-release builds of S10. But I have only seen 5 or 6 builds (including production builds) of S10. As of b46,