Is there a reason the hardware optimized libraries shouldn't be mounted
in a local zone?
In the local zone, they are 0 byte files:
bash-3.00# ls -l /platform/sun4u-us3/lib/libc_psr.so.1
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root bin0 May 25 09:35
/platform/sun4u-us3/lib/libc_psr.so.1
even though
Bill Casale wrote:
Is there a reason the hardware optimized libraries shouldn't be mounted
in a local zone?
They should be. This was bug
6407767 libc_psr does not get mounted in a zone
which was integrated into b41. What build are you running?
Jerry
Hi Jerry,
Thanks for your reply, I did see that bug but this is happening
on a V440 running Solaris 10 1/06 with KU 118833-23.
Bill
Jerry Jelinek wrote:
Bill Casale wrote:
Is there a reason the hardware optimized libraries shouldn't be
mounted in a local zone?
They should be. This was
Bill Casale wrote:
Hi Jerry,
Thanks for your reply, I did see that bug but this is happening
on a V440 running Solaris 10 1/06 with KU 118833-23.
It looks like this was also fixed in S10u3 build 4. I am not sure
if it is in a patch yet.
Jerry
___
Gregory Edwards - Software Support wrote:
SunOS wasoaf04 5.10 Generic_118822-25 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire
# cat /etc/release Solaris 10 1/06 s10s_u1wos_19a
SPARC
Copyright 2005 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Use is subject
Jens Elkner wrote:
Jens Elkner writes:
BTW: Found a workaround (at least for my case):
pkginfo | awk '{ print $2 }' | grep SUNWstaroffice /var/sadm/install/gz-only-packages
This reduced the zone size from ~ 950 to ~ 520 MB and the zone install time
from ~ 20 to 14 min.
Any objections
Jens Elkner writes:
In general, if you want new features quickly, you'll
want to use
Solaris Express.
Yes, actually I really wanna use Express (since Sol 10 software is pretty
much out of date - especially GNOME). But unfortunately it is not supported
by SUN so no chance to use it ...
i don't really see what this has to do with zones but...
the system would see the devices twice. ie. there would
be two /dev entries for each disk int he A5200. you would need
to just specify one path/device to each device to zfs. it would
then access the devices via that one path.
ed
On
Roshan Perera wrote:
Hi all,
Appreciate if someone can help me with VLAN tagging on zones please.
Details below. Dummy example..
Global Zone IP address 10.10.10.5 (IPMP real)
ce0 10.10.10.6 (IPMP test)
ce1 10.10.10.7
