On Wed 18 Jun 2008 at 10:36PM, Mike Gerdts wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 8:47 AM, Steffen Weiberle
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am not sure I have an opinion yet, as I am not sure what major
downgrade means. If that would allow you detach the zone from the new
system and re-attach on the
Darren Reed schrieb:
The attached diffs modify zoneadm to work like this:
zoneadm boot fred
But your change becomes counterintuitive (IMHO), when subcommand
options are used. The result certainly doesn't fit any commandline
standard (CLIP, etc) I know.
Compare the usage of zoneadm
Mike Gerdts wrote:
The only reason I would say not to use another option is to keep the
option free for other things in the future.
Mike,
Saving the option is not such a big concern. This option
would be brand-specific and as such, would not have to be
carried forward to other brands.
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 09:36:15AM +0200, Joerg Barfurth wrote:
Take all the unstated (in the original post) syntax changes into
account, I agree that it seems possible to have a (CLIP compliant)
syntax of the form
zoneadm subcommand [all-options] [zonename [operands]]
and that this is
Nicolas Williams schrieb:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 09:36:15AM +0200, Joerg Barfurth wrote:
Take all the unstated (in the original post) syntax changes into
account, I agree that it seems possible to have a (CLIP compliant)
syntax of the form
zoneadm subcommand [all-options] [zonename
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 06:19:30PM +0200, Joerg Barfurth wrote:
Nicolas Williams schrieb:
zoneadm subcommand [all-options]
That surely is a much easier change - and easy to do compatibly, if you
allow global options both before and after the subcommand.
But Darren apparently much prefers
Mark,
Make sure the customer has the latest cpio patch (127922-04)
and the latest LU patch (121430-24)
Mike
Mark Huff wrote:
IHAC I'm working with on Solaris Live Upgrade. A little background on
the customers architecture. They have two SunFire E6900's running
Solaris 10 8/07
Joerg Barfurth wrote:
Nicolas Williams schrieb:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 09:36:15AM +0200, Joerg Barfurth wrote:
Take all the unstated (in the original post) syntax changes into
account, I agree that it seems possible to have a (CLIP compliant)
syntax of the form
zoneadm subcommand