Re: [zones-discuss] need input for zone update on attach

2008-06-19 Thread Dan Price
On Wed 18 Jun 2008 at 10:36PM, Mike Gerdts wrote: On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 8:47 AM, Steffen Weiberle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am not sure I have an opinion yet, as I am not sure what major downgrade means. If that would allow you detach the zone from the new system and re-attach on the

Re: [zones-discuss] Making zoneadm more like the other adms...

2008-06-19 Thread Joerg Barfurth
Darren Reed schrieb: The attached diffs modify zoneadm to work like this: zoneadm boot fred But your change becomes counterintuitive (IMHO), when subcommand options are used. The result certainly doesn't fit any commandline standard (CLIP, etc) I know. Compare the usage of zoneadm

Re: [zones-discuss] need input for zone update on attach

2008-06-19 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Mike Gerdts wrote: The only reason I would say not to use another option is to keep the option free for other things in the future. Mike, Saving the option is not such a big concern. This option would be brand-specific and as such, would not have to be carried forward to other brands.

Re: [zones-discuss] need input for zone update on attach

2008-06-19 Thread Mike Gerdts
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 7:35 AM, Jerry Jelinek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mike Gerdts wrote: The only reason I would say not to use another option is to keep the option free for other things in the future. Mike, Saving the option is not such a big concern. This option would be

Re: [zones-discuss] Making zoneadm more like the other adms...

2008-06-19 Thread Nicolas Williams
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 09:36:15AM +0200, Joerg Barfurth wrote: Take all the unstated (in the original post) syntax changes into account, I agree that it seems possible to have a (CLIP compliant) syntax of the form zoneadm subcommand [all-options] [zonename [operands]] and that this is

Re: [zones-discuss] Making zoneadm more like the other adms...

2008-06-19 Thread Joerg Barfurth
Nicolas Williams schrieb: On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 09:36:15AM +0200, Joerg Barfurth wrote: Take all the unstated (in the original post) syntax changes into account, I agree that it seems possible to have a (CLIP compliant) syntax of the form zoneadm subcommand [all-options] [zonename

Re: [zones-discuss] Making zoneadm more like the other adms...

2008-06-19 Thread Nicolas Williams
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 06:19:30PM +0200, Joerg Barfurth wrote: Nicolas Williams schrieb: zoneadm subcommand [all-options] That surely is a much easier change - and easy to do compatibly, if you allow global options both before and after the subcommand. But Darren apparently much prefers

Re: [zones-discuss] Live Upgrade Issues

2008-06-19 Thread Michael Wahlberg
Mark, Make sure the customer has the latest cpio patch (127922-04) and the latest LU patch (121430-24) Mike Mark Huff wrote: IHAC I'm working with on Solaris Live Upgrade. A little background on the customers architecture. They have two SunFire E6900's running Solaris 10 8/07

Re: [zones-discuss] Making zoneadm more like the other adms...

2008-06-19 Thread Darren Reed
Joerg Barfurth wrote: Nicolas Williams schrieb: On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 09:36:15AM +0200, Joerg Barfurth wrote: Take all the unstated (in the original post) syntax changes into account, I agree that it seems possible to have a (CLIP compliant) syntax of the form zoneadm subcommand