Re: [zones-discuss] update from 111b to 134

2010-03-18 Thread Piotr Jasiukajtis
Hi,

That works for me.

Thanks,

On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Jerry Jelinek gerald.jeli...@sun.com wrote:
 On 03/17/10 09:16 AM, Piotr Jasiukajtis wrote:

 The zone was installed and running before the update. System was
 upgraded by using 'pkg image-update'. No different actions ware done.

 In that case, the zone is in an undefined state and
 unusable.  See:

 http://blogs.sun.com/jerrysblog/entry/updating_zones_on_opensolaris_2008

 and the ipkg(5) man page.  This situation is a
 temporary problem until the full zones support is
 provided with IPS.

 Jerry


 On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Jerry Jelinekgerald.jeli...@sun.com
  wrote:

 On 03/17/10 08:21 AM, Piotr Jasiukajtis wrote:

 Hi,

 After upgrade from 111b to b134 non local zone is not able to run
 properly.

 Was this a newly installed zone or one that
 existed from before the upgrade?  If it was
 a pre-existing zone, did you upgrade the
 software inside the zone to be in sync with
 the global zone?  If so, how?

 Jerry
 ___
 zones-discuss mailing list
 zones-discuss@opensolaris.org









-- 
Piotr Jasiukajtis | estibi | SCA OS0072
http://estseg.blogspot.com
___
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss@opensolaris.org

[zones-discuss] update from 111b to 134

2010-03-17 Thread Piotr Jasiukajtis
Hi,

After upgrade from 111b to b134 non local zone is not able to run properly.

file: /zones/repo1/root/sbin/zfs
initial argv: /usr/sbin/zfs mount -va
threading model: native threads
status: process terminated by SIGABRT (Abort), pid=29066 uid=0 code=-1
 $C
08046b78 libc_hwcap2.so.1`_lwp_kill+7(1, 6, 8046b98, fee5ab6e)
08046b98 libc_hwcap2.so.1`raise+0x22(6, 0, 8046be8, fee31fea)
08046be8 libc_hwcap2.so.1`abort+0xf2(8046c18, fedc5000, 8046c18,
8098670, 8098a70, 400)
08046c18 libzfs.so.1`zfs_verror+0xd5(8098648, 80f, fedad934, 8046c4c)
08046c38 libzfs.so.1`zfs_standard_error_fmt+0x1ea(8098648, ,
fedad934, fedb11b0, 8098648)
08046c58 libzfs.so.1`zfs_standard_error+0x28(8098648, ,
fedb11b0, fed60d08)
08047cd8 libzfs.so.1`namespace_reload+0x430(8098648, 1, 0, fed610ea)
08047d18 libzfs.so.1`zfs_iter_root+0x20(8098648, 8059090, 8047d30, 0)
08047d58 get_all_datasets+0x9a(1, 8047d88, 8047d8c, 1)
08047dc8 share_mount+0x46d(2, 2, 8047e64, 8047f12, 8047e60, 3)
08047de8 zfs_do_mount+0x13(2, 8047e64, 8047e60, 807187c)
08047e28 main+0x2af(3, 8047e60, 8047e70, 8047e1c)
08047e54 _start+0x7d(3, 8047f04, 8047f12, 8047f18, 0, 8047f1c)


# df -h
Segmentation Fault (core dumped)
# mount
/ on / read/write/setuid/devices/devic on Wed Mar 17 14:28:48 2010


# cat /var/svc/log/system-filesystem-local\:default.log
[ Oct 13 03:39:19 Enabled. ]
[ Oct 13 03:39:28 Rereading configuration. ]
[ Oct 13 03:39:32 Executing start method (/lib/svc/method/fs-local). ]
[ Oct 13 03:39:32 Method start exited with status 0. ]
[ Oct 13 03:51:39 Stopping because service disabled. ]
[ Oct 13 03:51:39 Executing stop method (null). ]
[ Oct 13 12:51:46 Enabled. ]
[ Oct 13 12:51:47 Executing start method (/lib/svc/method/fs-local). ]
[ Oct 13 12:51:47 Method start exited with status 0. ]

-- 
Piotr Jasiukajtis | estibi | SCA OS0072
http://estseg.blogspot.com
___
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [zones-discuss] update from 111b to 134

2010-03-17 Thread Jerry Jelinek

On 03/17/10 08:21 AM, Piotr Jasiukajtis wrote:

Hi,

After upgrade from 111b to b134 non local zone is not able to run properly.


Was this a newly installed zone or one that
existed from before the upgrade?  If it was
a pre-existing zone, did you upgrade the
software inside the zone to be in sync with
the global zone?  If so, how?

Jerry
___
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [zones-discuss] update from 111b to 134

2010-03-17 Thread Piotr Jasiukajtis
The zone was installed and running before the update. System was
upgraded by using 'pkg image-update'. No different actions ware done.

On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Jerry Jelinek gerald.jeli...@sun.com wrote:
 On 03/17/10 08:21 AM, Piotr Jasiukajtis wrote:

 Hi,

 After upgrade from 111b to b134 non local zone is not able to run
 properly.

 Was this a newly installed zone or one that
 existed from before the upgrade?  If it was
 a pre-existing zone, did you upgrade the
 software inside the zone to be in sync with
 the global zone?  If so, how?

 Jerry
 ___
 zones-discuss mailing list
 zones-discuss@opensolaris.org




-- 
Piotr Jasiukajtis | estibi | SCA OS0072
http://estseg.blogspot.com
___
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [zones-discuss] update from 111b to 134

2010-03-17 Thread Jerry Jelinek

On 03/17/10 09:16 AM, Piotr Jasiukajtis wrote:

The zone was installed and running before the update. System was
upgraded by using 'pkg image-update'. No different actions ware done.


In that case, the zone is in an undefined state and
unusable.  See:

http://blogs.sun.com/jerrysblog/entry/updating_zones_on_opensolaris_2008

and the ipkg(5) man page.  This situation is a
temporary problem until the full zones support is
provided with IPS.

Jerry



On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Jerry Jelinekgerald.jeli...@sun.com  wrote:

On 03/17/10 08:21 AM, Piotr Jasiukajtis wrote:


Hi,

After upgrade from 111b to b134 non local zone is not able to run
properly.


Was this a newly installed zone or one that
existed from before the upgrade?  If it was
a pre-existing zone, did you upgrade the
software inside the zone to be in sync with
the global zone?  If so, how?

Jerry
___
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss@opensolaris.org







___
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss@opensolaris.org