Re: [zones-discuss] [osol-discuss] Error on zoneadm attach -u when going from b132 to b133

2010-02-24 Thread Paul van der Zwan
On 22 feb 2010, at 15:02, Thomas Burgess wrote: > > you're lucky. It didn't work for me. I got caught in a catch 22 > i'd do attach -u and it would fail, then i'd do attach (without -u) and it > would tell me to do attach -u > Did you do the detach after the image-update ? That was a mistake

Re: [zones-discuss] [osol-discuss] Error on zoneadm attach -u when going from b132 to b133

2010-02-22 Thread Thomas Burgess
you're lucky. It didn't work for me. I got caught in a catch 22 i'd do attach -u and it would fail, then i'd do attach (without -u) and it would tell me to do attach -u On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Paul van der Zwan wrote: > > On 22 feb 2010, at 12:26, Alan Burlison wrote: > > > Paul van de

Re: [zones-discuss] [osol-discuss] Error on zoneadm attach -u when going from b132 to b133

2010-02-22 Thread Paul van der Zwan
On 22 feb 2010, at 12:26, Alan Burlison wrote: > Paul van der Zwan wrote: > >> If I run attach -u a second time it attaches without doing anything, or >> giving an error. >> Are my zones OK or are they partly upgraded ? > > Sounds like an issue mentioned in the release notes: > > http://mail.