Re: [zones-discuss] [osol-discuss] Error on zoneadm attach -u when going from b132 to b133

2010-02-24 Thread Paul van der Zwan

On 22 feb 2010, at 15:02, Thomas Burgess wrote:

> 
> you're lucky.  It didn't work for me.  I got caught in a catch 22
> i'd do attach -u and it would fail, then i'd do attach (without -u) and it 
> would tell me to do attach -u
> 
Did you do the detach after the image-update ? That was a mistake I made the 
first time I wanted
to upgrade a system with zones, doing the detach before the image-update.

My zones are fairly minimal, just ‘entire’ and a few extra packages, all from 
the dev repo.
Nothing from contrib in the zones, maybe that might be a difference.

Paul

> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Paul van der Zwan  
> wrote:
> 
> On 22 feb 2010, at 12:26, Alan Burlison wrote:
> 
> > Paul van der Zwan wrote:
> >
> >> If I run attach -u a second time it attaches without doing anything, or 
> >> giving an error.
> >> Are my zones OK or are they partly upgraded ?
> >
> > Sounds like an issue mentioned in the release notes:
> >
> > http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-announce/2010-February/001411.html
> > http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=14673
> >
> 
> That seems to be it. Glad I did what the release notes say I should have done 
> ;-)
> 
> 
> Thanks
>Paul
> 
> > --
> > Alan Burlison
> > --
> 
> ___
> zones-discuss mailing list
> zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
> 

___
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [zones-discuss] [osol-discuss] Error on zoneadm attach -u when going from b132 to b133

2010-02-22 Thread Thomas Burgess
you're lucky.  It didn't work for me.  I got caught in a catch 22
i'd do attach -u and it would fail, then i'd do attach (without -u) and it
would tell me to do attach -u

On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Paul van der Zwan
wrote:

>
> On 22 feb 2010, at 12:26, Alan Burlison wrote:
>
> > Paul van der Zwan wrote:
> >
> >> If I run attach -u a second time it attaches without doing anything, or
> giving an error.
> >> Are my zones OK or are they partly upgraded ?
> >
> > Sounds like an issue mentioned in the release notes:
> >
> >
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-announce/2010-February/001411.html
> > http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=14673
> >
>
> That seems to be it. Glad I did what the release notes say I should have
> done ;-)
>
>
> Thanks
>Paul
>
> > --
> > Alan Burlison
> > --
>
> ___
> zones-discuss mailing list
> zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
>
___
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [zones-discuss] [osol-discuss] Error on zoneadm attach -u when going from b132 to b133

2010-02-22 Thread Paul van der Zwan

On 22 feb 2010, at 12:26, Alan Burlison wrote:

> Paul van der Zwan wrote:
> 
>> If I run attach -u a second time it attaches without doing anything, or 
>> giving an error.
>> Are my zones OK or are they partly upgraded ?
> 
> Sounds like an issue mentioned in the release notes:
> 
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-announce/2010-February/001411.html
> http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=14673
> 

That seems to be it. Glad I did what the release notes say I should have done 
;-)


Thanks 
Paul

> -- 
> Alan Burlison
> --

___
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss@opensolaris.org