I don't think live_upgrade(5) is zfs friendly. I've tried to use live_upgrade(5) with my zones in a zfs filesystem and it didn't worked. You could try to detach the zone before the luupgrade and then attach it in the new BE, but I wouldn't hold my breath.
Antonello Jeff Cheeney wrote: > Maybe someone on the install or zones discussion lists can help answer > this question. > > > Giovanni Schmid wrote: >> I have read different articles/docs/posts about solaris zones and >> liveupgrade issues until now; however, I have some doubts about the right >> way to deploy liveupgrade boot environments in the following case. >> I have a system with two disks configured as "mirrors" (that is, the same >> fdisk partition and VTOC). >> On the primary disk, I installed Solaris 10 8/07 with two sparse root zones, >> say Z1 and Z2. Just two file systems were settled on the primary disk: an >> UFS mounted on /, and a ZFS pool mirroring slice 4 of the two disks and >> mounted on /zfspool on the 1st disk. The UFS is intended to contain all but >> user's homes. These are served through a ZFS, namely /zfspool/users/home. >> Only zone Z2 inherits this ZFS, via the "add fs" setting. >> All that premised, my questions are: >> What is the correct way of using Live Upgrade for this case ? Would >> something like: >> >> # lucreate -c bootenv1 -m /:c2d0s0:ufs -n bootenv2 >> >> be sufficient ? That is, will Z2 in bootenv2 "see" /zfspool/users/home ? >> >> Any help is appreciated ! >> >> g.s >> >> >> This message posted from opensolaris.org >> _______________________________________________ >> storage-discuss mailing list >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss >> > > _______________________________________________ > zones-discuss mailing list > zones-discuss@opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
