Re: [zones-discuss] Zones, Solaris 10 and ZFS...do zones need to sit on rpool ?

2009-04-07 Thread Nicolas Dorfsman
Le 6 avr. 09 à 21:12, Paul Davis a écrit : 121430-33 (or higher) supports ZFS root with ZFS zonepaths (each in their own zpools). Been testing this extensively as a POC and it works, lucreate plus patching. This is a really GOOD NEWS !I just want to sing or dance, or anything like

Re: [zones-discuss] Zones, Solaris 10 and ZFS...do zones need to sit on rpool ?

2009-04-06 Thread Alexander Skwar
Hi! On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 19:55, Nicolas Dorfsman n...@unikservice.eu wrote: Le 6 avr. 09 à 19:35, Alexander Skwar a écrit : On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 13:46, Nicolas Dorfsman n...@unikservice.eu wrote: I'm waiting for some patch to allow non-local zones to be located out of the

Re: [zones-discuss] Zones, Solaris 10 and ZFS...do zones need to sit on rpool ?

2009-04-06 Thread Enda O'Connor
Hi As far as I'm aware the latest Lu patches remove this restriction 121430-xx, but I have cc'ed the zfs team for some guidance. Enda Alexander Skwar wrote: Hi! On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 19:55, Nicolas Dorfsman n...@unikservice.eu wrote: Le 6 avr. 09 à 19:35, Alexander Skwar a écrit :

Re: [zones-discuss] Zones, Solaris 10 and ZFS...do zones need to sit on rpool ?

2009-04-06 Thread Alexander Skwar
Hello. On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 13:46, Nicolas Dorfsman n...@unikservice.eu wrote: Hi all, I'm waiting for some patch to allow non-local zones to be located out of the rpool before upgrading my customer mainframe (s/mainframe/sf15k/). Is there anybody here who knows

Re: [zones-discuss] Zones, Solaris 10 and ZFS...do zones need to sit on rpool ?

2009-04-06 Thread bob netherton
Is it not allowed to have non-global zones on an arbitrary zpool? Who says so? I bet there is more to the question than was originally asked. Yes, you can have non-global zones in ZFS starting with Solaris 10 10/08. If you also use Live Upgrade *and* you are using ZFS for your root