Eric, Chiming in here -- I think there's definitely a lot of interest in .NET bindings. I've undertaken a port of Jute to .NET before as well, and got about 50% of the way through before losing steam, so thank you for taking the initiative to get it done!
-ilya On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 8:32 PM, Eric Hauser <ewhau...@gmail.com> wrote: > I submitted the Jute changes back as ZOOKEEPER-747. > > Regarding contrib, I'd be happy to submit the client bindings back once I > do > a bit more cleanup. > > On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Hi Eric, this sounds great! Please consider submitting the client binding > > back, you could start it as a contrib package (src/contrib) until things > > settle and you get some usage. We recently have been seeing interest in > > running ZK on windows servers, so having .net would be awesome. > > http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/ZooKeeper/HowToContribute > > > > It would be nice to see the Jute support, btw this is a port of Hadoop's > > "recordio" package from a few years ago. We are actually looking to move > to > > Avro at some point, I'm sure they would love to have .net support as > well. > > > > Regards, > > > > Patrick > > > > > > On 04/15/2010 05:55 PM, Eric Hauser wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> I've ported the Java ZK client to .NET. It's available for forking at > >> http://github.com/ewhauser/zookeeper/. It is still in very early > stages, > >> but all of the client tests that I have ported complete successfully - > >> both > >> normal calls and watches are working successfully. Some things to keep > in > >> mind: > >> > >> - It's not actively being used at the moment > >> - I have not had any chance to do any performance testing > >> - The API will definitely be changing. I've ported watches over as is > in > >> order to get everything working, but I'll be changing that to use events > >> instead to make it more .NET-like. > >> - There are not any asynchronous methods on the ZK client API -- async > >> method calls are easy to do .NET. May add a wrapper for it at some > point. > >> > >> If there is any interest in having any part of my work go back into > trunk, > >> I'm happy to sign the ASF release. In particular, it would be nice if > the > >> C# support I added to Jute made it back into the core code base. > >> > >> >
