[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-880?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vishal K updated ZOOKEEPER-880:
---
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
patch for trunk
> QuorumCnxManager$SendWorker grows with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-880?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vishal K updated ZOOKEEPER-880:
---
Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-880.patch
The root cause of frequent disconnect needs to be resolved. In
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-880?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12933842#action_12933842
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-880:
Leader has the same problem as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-934?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12933838#action_12933838
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-934:
Nagios might be just sending some 8
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-880?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12933829#action_12933829
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-880:
Hi Flavio,
You are right. We can
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-933?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12933612#action_12933612
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-933:
I looks like we need a way to uniq
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-934?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12933610#action_12933610
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-934:
How about we reject connection if
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-880?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12933602#action_12933602
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-880:
Hi Benoit,
May I suggest to see if you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-932?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vishal K updated ZOOKEEPER-932:
---
Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-932.patch
Hi Flavio,
I have attached a diff that moves all blocking read
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-900?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vishal K reopened ZOOKEEPER-900:
The committed patch fixed one part of the problem (enforced timeout on network
IO).
Reopening for
Add sanity check for server ID
--
Key: ZOOKEEPER-934
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-934
Project: Zookeeper
Issue Type: Sub-task
Reporter: Vishal K
Fix For: 3.4.0
2
Remove wildcard QuorumPeer.OBSERVER_ID
---
Key: ZOOKEEPER-933
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-933
Project: Zookeeper
Issue Type: Sub-task
Reporter: Vishal K
Type: Sub-task
Reporter: Vishal K
Assignee: Vishal K
Fix For: 3.4.0
Copying relevant comments:
Vishal K added a comment - 02/Nov/10 02:09 PM
Hi Flavio,
I have a suggestion for changing the blocking IO code in QuorumCnxManager. It
keeps the current code
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-900?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12932995#action_12932995
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-900:
Hi Flavio,
Thanks. I will take shutting
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-902?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12932987#action_12932987
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-902:
fyi, I had not included test-patch.proper
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-900?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12932724#action_12932724
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-900:
Hi Flavio,
Currently the QCM keeps the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-900?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vishal K updated ZOOKEEPER-900:
---
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
patch submitted.
> FLE implementation should be improved
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-900?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vishal K updated ZOOKEEPER-900:
---
Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-900.patch
Hi Flavio, Pat,
I have attached the patch with suggested
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-900?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12932220#action_12932220
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-900:
Hi Flavio, Pat,
I will submit a new p
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-900?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vishal K updated ZOOKEEPER-900:
---
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
submitted patch ZOOKEEPER-900.patch1
> FLE implementat
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vishal K resolved ZOOKEEPER-914.
Resolution: Duplicate
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.3.3)
(was: 3.4.0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-900?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vishal K updated ZOOKEEPER-900:
---
Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-900.patch2
Attaching the patch without formatting changes.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-900?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12931522#action_12931522
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-900:
Hi Flavio,
Regarding your comment:
I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-900?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12931502#action_12931502
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-900:
Diff of log4j file was included by mistak
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-900?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12931489#action_12931489
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-900:
ok. how about making an exception
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-900?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vishal K updated ZOOKEEPER-900:
---
Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-900.patch1
There are two enhancements that I am working on for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-928?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12931085#action_12931085
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-928:
Hi Flavio,
Thats correct. I was plannin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-900?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12931056#action_12931056
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-900:
Hi Flavio,
I have a question regarding
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-928?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12930806#action_12930806
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-928:
Hi Flavio,
Can you please try it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-928?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12930789#action_12930789
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-928:
sorry for the false alarm. I got conf
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-928?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12930786#action_12930786
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-928:
ok, I see your point. I mis-analyzed this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-928?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12930780#action_12930780
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-928:
Hi Flavio,
I was aware of that. However,
Project: Zookeeper
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 3.3.2
Reporter: Vishal K
Fix For: 3.4.0
In Follower.followLeader() after syncing with the leader, the follower does:
while (self.isRunning()) {
readPacket(qp
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-900?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12930272#action_12930272
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-900:
Hi Mahadev,
Yes, I will provide a patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-917?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12930169#action_12930169
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-917:
Hi Flavio,
Lets see if I understand
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12929724#action_12929724
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-914:
OK, that didn't make sense. My comm
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12929681#action_12929681
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-914:
Hi Flavio,
The documentation is not c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-917?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12929602#action_12929602
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-917:
Hi Flavio,
Thanks for the clarifica
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12929589#action_12929589
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-914:
Hi Flavio,
You are right. Sorry, my com
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-917?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12928605#action_12928605
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-917:
Hi Flavio,
Sorry for not making much prog
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-900?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12928590#action_12928590
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-900:
Hi Flavio,
Thanks for your feedback. I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-900?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12927518#action_12927518
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-900:
Hi Flavio,
I have a suggestion for chan
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12927127#action_12927127
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-872:
Hi Pat,
The current code prints to st
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12926343#action_12926343
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-914:
Hi Pat, Flavio,
I will begin with admit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-851?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12925997#action_12925997
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-851:
I have not used observers yet. Looks like
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-907?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12925978#action_12925978
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-907:
Hi Ben,
Do you plan the change the sync()
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-907?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12925541#action_12925541
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-907:
It did occur to me. I thought this wa
QuorumCnxManager blocks forever
Key: ZOOKEEPER-914
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-914
Project: Zookeeper
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Vishal K
Assignee: Vishal K
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-907?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12925512#action_12925512
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-907:
Which return code are you referring to?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-851?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12925170#action_12925170
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-851:
going once, going twice ... :)
> ZK l
e gaurantees
> between a 2 node and 3 node cluster?
>
> Thanks
> mahadev
>
> On 10/25/10 1:05 PM, "Vishal K" wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I am thinking about the choices one would have to support multiple 2-node
> > clusters. Assume that for some r
Hi All,
I am thinking about the choices one would have to support multiple 2-node
clusters. Assume that for some reason one needs to support multiple 2-node
clusters.
This would mean they will have to figure out a way to run a third instance
of ZK server for each cluster somewhere to ensure that a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-907?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vishal K updated ZOOKEEPER-907:
---
Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-907.patch_v2
Attaching cleaned-up patch.
Ben, let me know what you think
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-907?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12924200#action_12924200
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-907:
Let the client connect to the follower.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-907?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12923627#action_12923627
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-907:
Ben,
What do you mean by partial sync?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-907?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12923107#action_12923107
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-907:
sure, I will write a test.
What do you t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-907?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vishal K updated ZOOKEEPER-907:
---
Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-907.patch
attaching patch.
> Spurious "KeeperErrorCode = Sessi
s Versions: 3.3.1
Reporter: Vishal K
The sync request does not set the session owner in Request.
As a result, the leader keeps printing:
2010-07-01 10:55:36,733 - INFO [ProcessThread:-1:preprequestproces...@405] -
Got user-level KeeperException when processing sessionid:0x298d3b1fa9
+1.
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> It's been a few days, any thoughts? Acceptable? I'd like to keep moving the
> ball forward. Thanks.
>
> Patrick
>
> On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 8:43 PM, 明珠刘 wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > 2010/10/14 Patrick Hunt
> >
> > > In March of this year we
the QA plan. We should all pitch in with what all
> should
> > be tested.
> >
> > Thanks
> > mahadev
> >
> > On 10/15/10 7:32 AM, "Vishal K" wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I would like to add my few cents here
tely work towards a plan. You should go ahead and
> create a jira for the QA plan. We should all pitch in with what all should
> be tested.
>
> Thanks
> mahadev
>
> On 10/15/10 7:32 AM, "Vishal K" wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to add my fe
Hi,
I would like to add my few cents here.
I would suggest to stay away from code cleanup unless it is absolutely
necessary.
I would also like to extend this discussion to understand the amount of
testing/QA to be performed before a release. How do we currently qualify a
release?
Recently, we h
: Bug
Reporter: Vishal K
Assignee: Flavio Junqueira
Priority: Critical
>From earlier email exchanges:
1. Blocking connects and accepts:
a) The first problem is in manager.toSend(). This invokes connectOne(), which
does a blocking connect. While testing, I chan
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-445?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12921360#action_12921360
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-445:
Is this a bug? If not, we should just c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-87?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12921355#action_12921355
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-87:
---
Hi Mahadev, Flavio,
I am trying to unders
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-851?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12921340#action_12921340
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-851:
Hi Henry ,
Any comments?
Thanks.
-Vi
from all servers during the time of the incident? If you could run the
> servers in DEBUG level logging during the time you reproduce the issue that
> would probably help:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER
>
> Thanks!
>
> Patrick
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 6, 20
riod), in which case the ephemeral znodes _should_
> reappear when A is restarted and successfully rejoins the cluster. (at
> least
> until the session timeout is exceeded)
>
> Patrick
>
> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Vishal K wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a 3
Hi,
I have a 3 node ZK cluster (A, B, C). On one of the the nodes (node A), I
have a ZK client running that connects to the local server and creates an
ephemeral znode to indicate clients on other nodes that it is online.
I have test script that reboots the zookeeper server as well as client on A
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-880?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12917685#action_12917685
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-880:
While debugging for https://issues.apache
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12913307#action_12913307
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-822:
Hi Flavio,
+1. Looks good. I remember loo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12912483#action_12912483
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-822:
Hi Flavio,
Thanks. I will take a look at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12909564#action_12909564
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-872:
Is there any reason why we dont ha
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vishal K updated ZOOKEEPER-872:
---
Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-872
patch attached.
> Small fixes to PurgeTxn
Small fixes to PurgeTxnLog
---
Key: ZOOKEEPER-872
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-872
Project: Zookeeper
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 3.3.1
Reporter: Vishal K
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12909560#action_12909560
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-822:
I agree with Mahadev.
> Leader e
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12909556#action_12909556
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-822:
Hi Flavio,
As I mentioned earlier, this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12906854#action_12906854
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-822:
Hi Flavio,
> I think we need some
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vishal K updated ZOOKEEPER-822:
---
Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-822.patch_v1
Hi,
I have attached the diff of my changes. It is a pretty
internal use and then start-off a discussion for
real fix. I will send out the diff soon.
> I also agree that it would be nice to have the numbers you are requesting.
> I would love to see
>
> Thanks,
> -Flavio
>
>
Thanks.
-Vishal
> On Sep 3, 2010, at 8:51 PM, Visha
apprecaited.
Thanks.
-Vishal
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Mahadev Konar wrote:
> Hi Vishal,
> Thanks for picking this up. My comments are inline:
>
>
> On 9/2/10 3:31 PM, "Vishal K" wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I had posted this message as a c
Hi All,
I had posted this message as a comment for ZOOKEEPER-822. I thought it might
be a good idea to give a wider attention so that it will be easier to
collect feedback.
I found few problems in the FLE implementation while debugging for:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-822. Fol
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12905528#action_12905528
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-822:
Hi Flavio,
I was planning to send out a
To me it seems like another config option would tell server 1 to bind to
> wildcard (or a host or whatever), but then the config files of the servers
> would still have to be different...
>
> Does that make sense?
>
> Jared
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Vishal K
pecifically "note that there should be no copyright notice in the header".
>
> Patrick
>
>
> On 08/27/2010 06:33 AM, Vishal K wrote:
>
>> Hi Henry,
>>
>> I will check with them. Can you point me to the other open source projects
>> that you are refe
0.0.0.0[:port][:port]".
>
> I guess my proposal is that the address specified in the server.# should be
> used. Advanced configurations can specify 0:0:0:0 to get the current
> behavior. This way there wouldn't need to be another option to say that
> (which would need custo
Hi Jared,
I like the idea of allowing communication with ZK on only the IP addresses
specified in the config file. This is useful when you are having a host with
multiple IP address and/or when you want to have traffic isolation. In our
setup, we will use this feature for traffic isolation. We hav
ts that don't have this restriction, so I'm hopeful that you can
> resolve this issue.
>
> Best,
> Henry
>
>
> On 26 August 2010 14:58, Vishal K wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I work for VMware. My company tells me that any contirubtion that I make
Hi All,
I work for VMware. My company tells me that any contirubtion that I make to
ZK needs to have a line saying "Copyright [year of creation - year of last
modification] VMware, Inc. All Rights Reserved".
If portions of a file are modified, then I could identify only those
portions of the file,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12902988#action_12902988
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-822:
The fix for problem 1 and 2 above elimin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12900898#action_12900898
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-822:
Correction:
2. SendWorker.run() calls fi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vishal K updated ZOOKEEPER-822:
---
Attachment: zookeeper-3.4.0.tar.gz
Hi,
To rule out any setup specific issues (VM/ESX/ect), I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12900401#action_12900401
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-822:
Hi Flavio,
Ah! my trunk is quite old
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12900111#action_12900111
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-822:
at line 852 in 10.17.119.101-zookeeper
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12900108#action_12900108
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-822:
I am suspecting that one of the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12899983#action_12899983
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-822:
While going through the code yesterday
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vishal K updated ZOOKEEPER-822:
---
Attachment: rhel.tar.gz
Hi Ivan,
Per your suggetion, I have reproduced the same problem on Red
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12899156#action_12899156
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-822:
Hi Ivan,
Can you describe me your setup?
ZK lets any node to become an observer
--
Key: ZOOKEEPER-851
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-851
Project: Zookeeper
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Vishal K
Fix For
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12896061#action_12896061
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-822:
Hi Ivan.
Were the logs of any help? I m
1 - 100 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
