[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-885?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12921244#action_12921244
]
Alexandre Hardy commented on ZOOKEEPER-885:
---
{quote}
Hi Alexandre, When you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-885?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12921251#action_12921251
]
Alexandre Hardy commented on ZOOKEEPER-885:
---
Hi Patrick,
{quote}
1) you are
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-885?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alexandre Hardy updated ZOOKEEPER-885:
--
Attachment: benchmark.csv
Here are some results with different settings of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-893?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12921286#action_12921286
]
Thijs Terlouw commented on ZOOKEEPER-893:
-
I'll try to write a test case, but
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-881?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12921306#action_12921306
]
Hudson commented on ZOOKEEPER-881:
--
Integrated in ZooKeeper-trunk #967 (See
Patrick Hunt:
I created a branch in SVN and a new Hudson job to track the ZOOKEEPER-823
patch. Getting this one done has been tough, Thomas has been working on it
but we are seeing intermittent failures.
lmk if you have any questions.
Hi Patrick,
thank you for the branch. Is there a way, how
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-851?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12921340#action_12921340
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-851:
Hi Henry ,
Any comments?
Thanks.
-Vishal
ZK
Hi Benjamin,
thank you for your response. Please find some comments inline.
Benjamin Reed:
code quality is important, and there are things we should keep in
mind, but in general i really don't like the idea of risking code
breakage because of a gratuitous code cleanup. we should be watching
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-445?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12921360#action_12921360
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-445:
Is this a bug? If not, we should just close
FLE implementation should be improved to use non-blocking sockets
-
Key: ZOOKEEPER-900
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-900
Project: Zookeeper
Issue Type:
Hi,
I would like to add my few cents here.
I would suggest to stay away from code cleanup unless it is absolutely
necessary.
I would also like to extend this discussion to understand the amount of
testing/QA to be performed before a release. How do we currently qualify a
release?
Recently, we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-885?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12921412#action_12921412
]
Benjamin Reed commented on ZOOKEEPER-885:
-
we are having problems reproducing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-885?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12921459#action_12921459
]
Dave Wright commented on ZOOKEEPER-885:
---
I don't think the cause of this is much
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-885?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12921467#action_12921467
]
Flavio Junqueira commented on ZOOKEEPER-885:
I'm not sure it is that simple,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-885?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12921471#action_12921471
]
Patrick Hunt commented on ZOOKEEPER-885:
re what Dave just mentioned (fsync
Well said Vishal.
I really like the points you put forth!!!
Agree on all the points, but again, all the point you mention require
commitment from folks like you. Its a pretty hard task to test all the
corner cases of ZooKeeper. I'd expect everyone to pitch in for testing a
release. We should
Recently, we have ran into issues in ZK that I believe should have caught
by some basic testing before the release
Vishal, can you be more specific, point out specific JIRAs that you entered
would be very valuable. Don't worry about hurting our feelings or anything,
without this type of feedback
i think we have a very different perspective on the quality issue:
I didn't want to say it that clear, but especially the new Netty code, both on
client and server side is IMHO an example of new code in very bad shape. The
client code patch even changes the FindBugs configuration to exclude
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-804?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jared Cantwell updated ZOOKEEPER-804:
-
Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-804-1.patch
Not sure what the protocol is here, but I'm gonna
Hi Mahadev,
Yes this will require effort from the community. In a related note how many
of the contributors do you think are dedicated (either partially or fully to
ZK development/testing)? This will help to in understanding how much effort
will be required for tasks and how we can prioritize
Hi Patrick,
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
Recently, we have ran into issues in ZK that I believe should have caught
by some basic testing before the release
Vishal, can you be more specific, point out specific JIRAs that you entered
would be very
I broadly agree with Ben - all meaningful code changes carry a risk of
destabilization (otherwise software development would be very easy) so we
should guard against improving cleanliness only for its own sake. At the
point where bad code gets in the way of fixing bugs or adding features, I
think
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-885?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12921528#action_12921528
]
Dave Wright commented on ZOOKEEPER-885:
---
Has it been verified that ZK is doing no
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-885?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12921557#action_12921557
]
Flavio Junqueira commented on ZOOKEEPER-885:
I've been running it and there
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-804?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12921558#action_12921558
]
Michi Mutsuzaki commented on ZOOKEEPER-804:
---
Jared, thank you for volunteering
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Henry Robinson he...@cloudera.com wrote:
The netty patch is a good test case for this approach. If we feel that
reworking the structure of the existing server cnxn code will make it
significantly easier to add a second implementation that adheres to the
same
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Henry Robinson he...@cloudera.com wrote:
The netty patch is a good test case for this approach. If we feel that
reworking the structure of the existing server cnxn code will make it
significantly easier to add a second implementation that adheres to the
same
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-804?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12921573#action_12921573
]
Patrick Hunt commented on ZOOKEEPER-804:
Thanks Jared, I missed your question on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-804?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Patrick Hunt updated ZOOKEEPER-804:
---
Status: Patch Available (was: Reopened)
c unit tests failing due to assertion cptr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-804?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12921583#action_12921583
]
Michi Mutsuzaki commented on ZOOKEEPER-804:
---
The patch looks good, but I can't
actually, the other way of doing the netty patch (since i'm scared of
merges) would be to do a refactor cleanup patch with an eye toward
netty, and then another patch to actually add netty. that would have
been nice because the first patch would allow us to more easily make
sure that NIO
31 matches
Mail list logo
