[jira] Updated: (ZOOKEEPER-907) Spurious KeeperErrorCode = Session moved messages

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-907?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vishal K updated ZOOKEEPER-907: --- Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-907.patch_v2 Attaching cleaned-up patch. Ben, let me know what you think

[jira] Commented: (ZOOKEEPER-896) Improve C client to support dynamic authentication schemes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-896?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12924669#action_12924669 ] Patrick Hunt commented on ZOOKEEPER-896: Ben/Mahadev any comments on this

[jira] Updated: (ZOOKEEPER-896) Improve C client to support dynamic authentication schemes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-896?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Patrick Hunt updated ZOOKEEPER-896: --- Assignee: Botond Hejj Improve C client to support dynamic authentication schemes

[jira] Updated: (ZOOKEEPER-904) super digest is not actually acting as a full superuser

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-904?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Patrick Hunt updated ZOOKEEPER-904: --- Fix Version/s: 3.3.2 We should consider this for 3.3.2 as well, or at least 3.3.3 super

[jira] Commented: (ZOOKEEPER-904) super digest is not actually acting as a full superuser

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-904?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12924673#action_12924673 ] Camille Fournier commented on ZOOKEEPER-904: I would love it in 3.3.2, will

Re: Fix release 3.3.2 planning, status.

Quick update. 794 was resolved but a new blocker came in in the mean time: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-907 Ben can you comment on this, a review would be great (I'm willing to commit). There are 3 other patch availables for 3.3.2, if someone could review those as well it

[jira] Updated: (ZOOKEEPER-904) super digest is not actually acting as a full superuser

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-904?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Camille Fournier updated ZOOKEEPER-904: --- Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-904-332.patch for 3.3.2 release super digest is not

[jira] Updated: (ZOOKEEPER-905) enhance zkServer.sh for easier zookeeper automation-izing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-905?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Patrick Hunt updated ZOOKEEPER-905: --- Fix Version/s: 3.4.0 Assignee: Nicholas Harteau enhance zkServer.sh for easier

Allowing a ZooKeeper server to be part of multiple clusters

Hi All, I am thinking about the choices one would have to support multiple 2-node clusters. Assume that for some reason one needs to support multiple 2-node clusters. This would mean they will have to figure out a way to run a third instance of ZK server for each cluster somewhere to ensure that

Re: Allowing a ZooKeeper server to be part of multiple clusters

Hi Vishal, This idea (2.) had been kicked around intially by Flavio. I think he¹ll probably chip in on the discussion. I am just curious on the whats the idea behind your proposal? Is this to provide some kind of failure gaurantees between a 2 node and 3 node cluster? Thanks mahadev On

Re: Allowing a ZooKeeper server to be part of multiple clusters

Hi Mahadev, It lets one run multiple 2-node clusters. Suppose I have an application that does a simple 2-way mirroring of my data and uses ZK for clustering. If I need to support many 2-node clusters, where will I find the spare machines to run the third instance for each cluster? -Vishal On

[jira] Commented: (ZOOKEEPER-805) four letter words fail with latest ubuntu nc.openbsd

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-805?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12924732#action_12924732 ] Mahadev konar commented on ZOOKEEPER-805: - sure, do you want to add some

[jira] Updated: (ZOOKEEPER-897) C Client seg faults during close

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-897?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mahadev konar updated ZOOKEEPER-897: Status: Open (was: Patch Available) jared, The patch that you provided leaks memory

[jira] Commented: (ZOOKEEPER-897) C Client seg faults during close

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-897?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12924748#action_12924748 ] Jared Cantwell commented on ZOOKEEPER-897: -- we are using the 3.3.2 release. i

Re: [VOTE] ZooKeeper as TLP?

+1 On 10/22/2010 02:42 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote: Please vote as to whether you think ZooKeeper should become a top-level Apache project, as discussed previously on this list. I've included below a draft board resolution. Do folks support sending this request on to the Hadoop PMC? Patrick

Apache now has reviewboard

FYI: https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/reviewboard_instance_running_at_the We should start using this, I've used it for other projects and it worked out quite well. Patrick

Re: Apache now has reviewboard

And we're on it: https://reviews.apache.org/groups/zookeeper/ https://reviews.apache.org/groups/zookeeper/We should rework our howtocommit to incorporate this. Patrick On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 10:16 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote: FYI: