On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 18:25, Patrick Huntph...@apache.org wrote:
The configure script is free license (it's in the header of the file). IANAL
but based on my understanding of apache license requirements this makes the
file a TYPE A license, as there are no other stated requirements wrt
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 19:10, Owen O'Malleyo...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
Bernd Fondermann wrote:
I'm not saying that the license is incompatible, I am saying that you
need to record third party contributions in the NOTICE file.
The critical reference is:
Bernd Fondermann wrote:
I'm not saying that the license is incompatible, I am saying that you
need to record third party contributions in the NOTICE file.
The critical reference is:
http://ftp.gnu.org/old-gnu/Manuals/autoconf-2.53/html_node/Distributing.html#Distributing
In particular, the
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 18:12, Patrick Huntph...@apache.org wrote:
Bernd Fondermann wrote:
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 18:25, Patrick Huntph...@apache.org wrote:
The configure script is free license (it's in the header of the file).
IANAL
but based on my understanding of apache license
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 20:43, Patrick Huntph...@apache.org wrote:
Bernd Fondermann wrote:
Well, I'm not guessing any more than you do. :-)
:-)
I didn't -1, because I've no binding vote anyway on this PMC.
I just checked out the release and gave feedback, whether it's
appreciated or not
Bernd Fondermann wrote:
Well, I'm not guessing any more than you do. :-)
:-)
I didn't -1, because I've no binding vote anyway on this PMC.
I just checked out the release and gave feedback, whether it's
appreciated or not I'm not quite sure.
We take all serious votes seriously.
Imperative
No worries. Thanks for pointing this out. I'm not against giving credit
where it's due, so while may be disagreement on whether this is required
or not I'm happy to add this to the notice.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-521
If you have any comments on the suggested text
Hi,
There is foreign code in the release tar ball, which is not attributed
to in the top-level LICENSE/NOTICE file.
see for example
src/c/configure
So I guess it is not safe to release this as-is.
It would be nice if the release artifacts would be named
apache-zookeeper...
but this more my
The configure script is free license (it's in the header of the file).
IANAL but based on my understanding of apache license requirements this
makes the file a TYPE A license, as there are no other stated
requirements wrt notice, we are in compliance.
Patrick
Bernd Fondermann wrote:
Hi,
