The version of Jute we use is really an ancient version of recordio
ser/deser library in hadoop. We do want to move to some
better(versioned/fast/well accepted) ser/deser library.
mahadev
On 1/7/09 12:08 PM, Kevin Burton bur...@spinn3r.com wrote:
Ah... you think it was because it was empty?
Whatever we do the changes should support having more than one
marshaling format/version co-exist. Both for b/w compatibility as well
as enabling different serialization mechanisms (jute or pbuffer or
thrift or etch, etc...)
Patrick
Mahadev Konar wrote:
The version of Jute we use is really
protocol buffers are nice... the variable int stuff is cool.
Though is the protocol very complicated? Why not write a custom hand
written Externalizable format?
These frameworks are often more trouble than they're worth for small
protocols.
Kevin
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Patrick
