Re: [Zope-dev] zope.i18n plural form support

2012-05-23 Thread Thomas Massmann
;) Cheers, Thomas Thomas Massmann wrote: Hi, I added the plural form support (see a corresponding ticket here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope.i18n/+bug/161985) in a separate branch: https://code.launchpad.net/~thomas-massmann/zope.i18n/plural. This code was mainly implemented during the 2012

Re: [Zope-dev] zope.i18n plural form support

2012-05-18 Thread Thomas Massmann
Hi, I can do it. But I'm not that familiar with Pylons/Pyramid right now. So this will basically take some time. But, yes ;) Thomas Wichert Akkerman wrote: On 05/17/2012 10:42 PM, Thomas Massmann wrote: Hi, I added the plural form support (see a corresponding ticket here: https

Re: [Zope-dev] zope.i18n plural form support

2012-05-18 Thread Thomas Massmann
Ok, repo forked. I'll dig into it... ;) Thomas Wichert Akkerman wrote: On 05/18/2012 10:07 AM, Thomas Massmann wrote: Hi, I can do it. But I'm not that familiar with Pylons/Pyramid right now. So this will basically take some time. But, yes ;) translationstring is a very simple package

[Zope-dev] zope.i18n plural form support

2012-05-17 Thread Thomas Massmann
Hi, I added the plural form support (see a corresponding ticket here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope.i18n/+bug/161985) in a separate branch: https://code.launchpad.net/~thomas-massmann/zope.i18n/plural. This code was mainly implemented during the 2012 Plonekonf in Munich. It is already

[Zope-dev] New ssh keyfor svn access

2012-04-05 Thread Thomas Lotze
Hi, I'd like to have a new ssh public key installed for svn access to svn.zope.org. Whom would I need to send it to? The web interface says webmaster at zope.org but that doesn't seem to get me a response. Thank you. -- Thomas ___ Zope-Dev maillist

Re: [Zope-dev] New ssh keyfor svn access

2012-04-05 Thread Thomas Lotze
Hi Tres, thank you for your reply, everything works fine now. -- Thomas ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org

[Zope-Checkins] SVN: Zope/branches/2.13/ Fixed a regression of 2.13.9 in webdav support that broke external editor feature.

2011-09-28 Thread Thomas Desvenain
Log message for revision 122984: Fixed a regression of 2.13.9 in webdav support that broke external editor feature. Changed: U Zope/branches/2.13/doc/CHANGES.rst U Zope/branches/2.13/src/webdav/Resource.py -=- Modified: Zope/branches/2.13/doc/CHANGES.rst

[Zope-Checkins] SVN: Zope/trunk/ Fixed a regression in webdav support that broke external editor feature.

2011-09-28 Thread Thomas Desvenain
Log message for revision 122985: Fixed a regression in webdav support that broke external editor feature. Changed: U Zope/trunk/doc/CHANGES.rst U Zope/trunk/src/webdav/Resource.py -=- Modified: Zope/trunk/doc/CHANGES.rst

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope Tests: 140 OK, 13 Failed

2010-12-11 Thread Thomas Lotze
://namespaces.zope.org/zope', u'subscriber') - - % - I think Thomas Lotze added this file yesterday. I think it likely needs to have the following near the top:: include file=meta.zcml package=zope.component/ This not entirely correct. The file has

Re: [Zope-dev] Functional areas of Zope

2010-11-01 Thread Thomas Lotze
and coordinate development efforts and communication. -- Thomas ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope

Re: [Zope-dev] Functional areas of Zope

2010-11-01 Thread Thomas Lotze
? -- Thomas ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman

Re: [Zope-dev] Functional areas of Zope

2010-11-01 Thread Thomas Lotze
Thomas Lotze wrote: To get the discussion started, I'll give a few random examples of functional areas that we thought of immediately: - software architecture (interfaces, components) - data persistence (ZODB) - URL resolution (object traversal) - form generation (form libs for HTML forms

[Zope-dev] Functional areas of Zope

2010-10-18 Thread Thomas Lotze
area. Thank you very much for your participation. -- Thomas ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: [Zope-dev] A summary of Interfaces vs ZCA concepts

2009-12-21 Thread Thomas Lotze
), or are we talking about a single plugin being registered at a time? I'd prefer the latter as it's more straight-forward. Or are there really compelling use cases for registering more than one hook at the same time? -- Thomas ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope

Re: [Zope-dev] A summary of Interfaces vs ZCA concepts

2009-12-21 Thread Thomas Lotze
Chris McDonough wrote: Thomas Lotze wrote: Because then, if you use third-party code that uses zope.interface.Interface and other code (third-party or your own) that uses the subclassed interfaces, you'll have to deal with both types at the same time in your client code. You could use

Re: [Zope-dev] A summary of Interfaces vs ZCA concepts

2009-12-20 Thread Thomas Lotze
such code be? -- Thomas ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org

Re: [Zope-dev] Interfaces vs ZCA concepts

2009-12-17 Thread Thomas Lotze
, such as propagation along the call stack. -- Thomas ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https

Re: [Zope-dev] A summary of Interfaces vs ZCA concepts

2009-12-17 Thread Thomas Lotze
Martijn Faassen wrote: Here's a summary of what has been going on in this thread with some attempts at conclusions that have support of the consensus so that Thomas can proceed Thank you, half an hour later and I'd have written the summary ;o) * We want to implement .adapter(), .utility

Re: [Zope-dev] Interfaces vs ZCA concepts

2009-12-16 Thread Thomas Lotze
Martijn Faassen wrote: Thomas Lotze wrote: Martijn Faassen wrote: * have dummy implementations in zope.interface that raise NotImplementedError That would still introduce too many zope.component concepts into zope.interface IMO: obviously that of utilities as one of the dummy methods

Re: [Zope-dev] Interfaces vs ZCA concepts

2009-12-16 Thread Thomas Lotze
Thomas Lotze wrote: I'm not sure whether we should make the name of that parameter consistent between zope.component and zope.interface, Sorry, nevermind. Of course we'll want to rename that parameter as our secret plan is to access the ZCA through Interface.__call__ one day. -- Thomas

[Zope-dev] Interfaces vs ZCA concepts

2009-12-15 Thread Thomas Lotze
registered by the same mechanism zope.component would end up employing, which is a big conceptual advantage from my point of view. What do people think of this? -- Thomas ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: [Zope-dev] Interfaces vs ZCA concepts

2009-12-15 Thread Thomas Lotze
argument is another thing that is sneaking from zope.component into zope.component. -- Thomas ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists

Re: [Zope-dev] the ZCA API decision

2009-12-05 Thread Thomas Lotze
would be a good time to add this anyway, so we get all API changes at once, even if they are fully backwards compatible. Do we still want to call the new release 4.0 if no backwards-incompatible change is going to be made? -- Thomas ___ Zope-Dev

Re: [Zope-dev] the ZCA API decision

2009-12-04 Thread Thomas Lotze
be acceptable, considering that this wouldn't be visible to users of the component architecture but only to implementors of component frameworks like zope.component? -- Thomas ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman

Re: [Zope-dev] the ZCA API decision

2009-12-03 Thread Thomas Lotze
Martijn Faassen wrote: Thomas Lotze, are you happy enough with this to still help with the implementation? I am indeed. This isn't the ideal solution I had hoped for, but it is a big step in a good direction from my point of view and I don't see any part of it that might take us away from

Re: [Zope-dev] the ZCA API decision

2009-12-03 Thread Thomas Lotze
, given that he's the one who started the discussion. As for any technical questions, it's too late in the night over here now for me to say anything serious, so I'll reply to that tomorrow. -- Thomas ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https

Re: [Zope-dev] implementing zope.component 4.0

2009-12-02 Thread Thomas Lotze
Gary Poster wrote: On Dec 2, 2009, at 8:33 AM, Fred Drake wrote: On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 2:21 AM, Thomas Lotze t...@gocept.com wrote: To be honest, I just don't see why this whole singleton business shouldn't be orthogonal to the concepts of the component architecture. Well said

Re: [Zope-dev] implementing zope.component 4.0

2009-12-02 Thread Thomas Lotze
place. I think the difference between these two perspectives may have to do with why some people in this discussion confuse (as I see it) the concepts of instance vs. factory registration and adapter vs. utility lookup. -- Thomas ___ Zope-Dev maillist

Re: [Zope-dev] implementing zope.component 4.0

2009-12-02 Thread Thomas Lotze
understand the motivation behind your arguments, and I do have a different opinion. OTOH, it's probably helpful for the discussion to have spelled this disagreement out. -- Thomas ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman

Re: [Zope-dev] implementing zope.component 4.0

2009-12-01 Thread Thomas Lotze
of the component architecture. -- Thomas ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https

Re: [Zope-dev] implementing zope.component 4.0

2009-11-30 Thread Thomas Lotze
are very similar IMO in that they describe how the object behaves and what you can do with it, the difference being only that calling an interface adds some abstraction and flexibility. -- Thomas ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https

Re: [Zope-dev] implementing zope.component 4.0

2009-11-27 Thread Thomas Lotze
, any volunteers? I'd like to work on this. -- Thomas ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope

Re: [Zope-dev] improving the utility and adapter lookup APIs

2009-11-26 Thread Thomas Lotze
Martijn Faassen wrote: Thomas Lotze wrote: You didn't explicitly mention the subject of backwards compatibility in your original message, so let's make it explicit now: Is backwards compatibility a goal in this discussion? True. It's indeed a goal, as I'd like to be able to use this sooner

Re: [Zope-dev] improving the utility and adapter lookup APIs

2009-11-26 Thread Thomas Lotze
Martijn Faassen wrote: Thomas Lotze wrote: [snip] Then let me suggest not changing the call signature of an interface at all but only add one or a few new methods. Firstly, this will keep backwards compatibility even with code that adapts a tuple, and secondly, it allows us to implement

Re: [Zope-dev] Releasing zope.browserresource

2009-11-25 Thread Thomas Lotze
Benji York wrote: On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 1:16 AM, Thomas Lotze t...@gocept.com wrote: Argh, now the PyPI UI is really broken for me... No, seriously - thank you very much. If you're a GreaseMonkey user, try this: // turn off (potentially) long list of projects GM_addStyle('div#document

Re: [Zope-dev] improving the utility and adapter lookup APIs

2009-11-25 Thread Thomas Lotze
seem to remember there had been some discussion at some point about dropping or at least loosening the distinction between utilities and adapters anyway, so this would be the opportunity to do so at the API level. -- Thomas ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope

Re: [Zope-dev] improving the utility and adapter lookup APIs

2009-11-25 Thread Thomas Lotze
Gary Poster wrote: On Nov 25, 2009, at 11:17 AM, Thomas Lotze wrote: What about a simple and consistent API for all components including utilities, adapters and multiadapters: IFoo() IFoo(x) IFoo(x, y) I seem to remember there had been some discussion at some point about dropping

Re: [Zope-dev] improving the utility and adapter lookup APIs

2009-11-25 Thread Thomas Lotze
Martijn Faassen wrote: Thomas Lotze wrote: [snip] What about a simple and consistent API for all components including utilities, adapters and multiadapters: IFoo() IFoo(x) IFoo(x, y) The last one won't work if we want to maintain backwards compatibility. The second argument

[Zope-dev] Making zope.dublincore independent of zope.annotation

2009-11-24 Thread Thomas Lotze
or the next. -- Thomas ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org

[Zope-dev] Releasing zope.browserresource

2009-11-24 Thread Thomas Lotze
Could somebody please give me PyPI rights for zope.browserresource? I'd like to release a new version of it which includes the recent fixes to its dependencies. Thank you very much. -- Thomas ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https

Re: [Zope-dev] Releasing zope.browserresource

2009-11-24 Thread Thomas Lotze
Stephan Richter wrote: On Tuesday 24 November 2009, Thomas Lotze wrote: Could somebody please give me PyPI rights for zope.browserresource? I'd like to release a new version of it which includes the recent fixes to its dependencies. Thank you very much. I am in the process of making you

Re: [Zope-dev] Where does ISite belong conceptually?

2009-11-03 Thread Thomas Lotze
Martijn Faassen wrote: Thomas Lotze wrote: I wonder: should we start requiring that the object passed to setSite() implement (or even be adaptable to) IPossibleSite? I think the simplest way forward would be not to change the semantics as part of this step. Agreed. -- Thomas

Re: [Zope-dev] zope.site.hooks

2009-10-19 Thread Thomas Lotze
you with it. -- Thomas ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org

Re: [Zope-dev] Proposal: cleaning up the content-type story

2009-10-19 Thread Thomas Lotze
Thomas Lotze wrote: I'm still going to move the zope.publisher.contenttype functionality to zope.contenttype which will ease some packages' dependencies, JFTR: I've done that now, including updates to packages which used to import from zope.publisher.contenttype. -- Thomas

Re: [Zope-dev] allow-picked-versions=false in ztk.cfg?

2009-10-08 Thread Thomas Lotze
Martijn Faassen wrote: Martin Aspeli wrote: Hanno Schlichting wrote: On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 10:29 PM, Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com wrote: [ztk.cfg] contains a line allow-picked-versions = false I agree with Thomas that we should remove this from ztk.cfg, as if we publish

Re: [Zope-dev] zope.site.hooks

2009-10-07 Thread Thomas Lotze
Martijn Faassen wrote: Thomas Lotze wrote: IMO it would be interesting to have the concept of the current site available separately from the rest of zope.site with its 30 dependencies. (For example, zope.browserresource demonstrates how with the present zope.site the need to know the current

Re: [Zope-dev] zope.site.hooks

2009-10-07 Thread Thomas Lotze
Thomas Lotze wrote: I thought about that one briefly, but I don't like it because it introduces at least some knowledge about the security concept to zope.component. The more I think about it, the less evil this appears to me, though. After all, the zope.component.zcml module has been

Re: [Zope-dev] zope.site.hooks

2009-10-07 Thread Thomas Lotze
mentioned the zcml extra only because that's how zope.component has to do with the security concept already, as a motivation of why I'm letting go of my opposition to introducing more of that concept into zope.component. -- Thomas ___ Zope-Dev maillist

Re: [Zope-dev] Proposal: cleaning up the content-type story

2009-10-07 Thread Thomas Lotze
Thomas Lotze wrote: I'm still going to move the zope.publisher.contenttype functionality to zope.contenttype which will ease some packages' dependencies, and I'll try to move some appropriate bits of code from zope.mimetype to zope.contenttype. Before doing so, however, I'd like to release

Re: [Zope-dev] Proposal: cleaning up the content-type story

2009-10-07 Thread Thomas Lotze
. Having rights for all packages involved with ZTK refactorings would be helpful, though. -- Thomas ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists

[Zope-dev] Removing zope.testrecorder from the ZTK

2009-10-07 Thread Thomas Lotze
. -- Thomas ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: [Zope-dev] Removing zope.testrecorder from the ZTK

2009-10-07 Thread Thomas Lotze
Martijn Faassen wrote: Jim Fulton wrote: [snip] In any case, I agree it should be dropped from the ZTK. +1 on dropping it too. Done. -- Thomas ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev

Re: [Zope-dev] Proposal: cleaning up the content-type story

2009-10-06 Thread Thomas Lotze
Thomas Lotze wrote: At present, zope.contenttype doesn't have any dependencies within the ZTK, and zope.mimetype depends on zope.configuration, zope.component and zope.interface. zope.publisher.contenttype doesn't import any zope code. - Switching packages that depend on zope.mimetype would

Re: [Zope-dev] Proposal: cleaning up the content-type story

2009-10-06 Thread Thomas Lotze
Martin Aspeli wrote: Thomas Lotze wrote: - zope.contenttype: parsing of MIME-type identifiers, guessing the MIME type of file contents, preferrably without dependencies within the ZTK Can I suggest that we use a different name? 'content type' to me sounds like CMS-y functionality. We

[Zope-dev] zope.site.hooks

2009-10-06 Thread Thomas Lotze
were to remain a part of zope.site, this would rid zope.site of the dependency on zope.security and at least one other package.) -- Thomas ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts

Re: [Zope-dev] Updating the ZTK KGS

2009-10-06 Thread Thomas Lotze
of the docs on versioned URLs. Agreed. -- Thomas ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce

Re: [Zope-dev] Updating the ZTK KGS

2009-10-05 Thread Thomas Lotze
of versions for reuse. How? I see two options: - make ztk.cfg available from zope.org (why docs.zope.org, btw?) under a versioned URL - release a ztk egg that depends on the exactly versioned packages The latter is probably the more reusable. -- Thomas

[Zope-dev] Updating the ZTK KGS

2009-10-01 Thread Thomas Lotze
-- Thomas ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman

[Zope-dev] Proposal: cleaning up the content-type story

2009-10-01 Thread Thomas Lotze
if zope.publisher.contenttype were to be merged with the latter. Further, the parser in zope.publisher.contenttype needs to be made more conformant with RfC 2045 and be used by other code that does some content-type matching of its own right now, such as zope.publisher.http. -- Thomas

Re: [Zope-dev] Proposal: cleaning up the content-type story

2009-10-01 Thread Thomas Lotze
Tres Seaver wrote: Thomas Lotze wrote: Following up to Martijn's observations on the ZTK, I'd like to propose a clean-up of how we handle content types. There are several unrelated pieces of code concerned with content types, these include at least zope.contenttype, zope.mimetype

Re: [Zope-dev] Undeclared dependency of zope.site on zope.app.publication

2009-09-29 Thread Thomas Lotze
Martijn Faassen wrote: Thomas Lotze wrote: I just noticed that zope.site depends on zope.app.publication, both via configure.zcml and the tests. The dependency isn't currently declared. On the other hand, zope.app.publication doesn't yet depend on zope.site. I'd like to get rid

Re: [Zope-dev] Dependencies of zope.error

2009-09-29 Thread Thomas Lotze
Martijn Faassen wrote: Thomas Lotze wrote: I think I'll release the current zope.error later today so people get the benefit of the lighter dependencies. Given you access to this too. :) Thank you, I've just made the release. -- Thomas

Re: [Zope-dev] Dependencies of zope.error

2009-09-28 Thread Thomas Lotze
dependencies. -- Thomas ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org

Re: [Zope-dev] various ZTK observations

2009-09-24 Thread Thomas Lotze
and zope.app.file: isn't zope.file an extracted version of zope.app.file? If not, we need to think about that too. It isn't, they both have a long separate history. They also provide completely unrelated interfaces and implementations of file content objects. -- Thomas

[Zope-dev] Dependencies of zope.error

2009-09-24 Thread Thomas Lotze
the dependency on zope.publisher would make it 10. -- Thomas ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo

[Zope-dev] Testing guideline (was: zope.location.pickling.PathPersistent and BBB)

2009-09-24 Thread Thomas Lotze
Thomas Lotze wrote: I've considered all packages mentioned in the current ztk.cfg that come from the zope.* namespace. [...] Come to think about it, I'm not sure whether and how far I should investigate beyond the ztk for removals like this; are there zope.* packages in the repository

[Zope-dev] Undeclared dependency of zope.site on zope.app.publication

2009-09-23 Thread Thomas Lotze
think it would be OK to invert it by moving the relevant ZCML declarations (two event handler registrations) and the two pieces of test regarding traversal behaviour to zope.app.publisher, which would thereby grow a new dependency on zope.site. What do others think? -- Thomas

Re: [Zope-dev] Undeclared dependency of zope.site on zope.app.publication

2009-09-23 Thread Thomas Lotze
Michael Howitz wrote: Am 23.09.2009 um 08:06 schrieb Thomas Lotze: I just noticed that zope.site depends on zope.app.publication, both via configure.zcml and the tests. The dependency isn't currently declared. On the other hand, zope.app.publication doesn't yet depend on zope.site. I'd like

Re: [Zope-dev] various ZTK observations

2009-09-21 Thread Thomas Lotze
RfC. I guess one might want to clean up this story as a whole. -- Thomas ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org

Re: [Zope-dev] zope.location.pickling.PathPersistent and BBB

2009-09-17 Thread Thomas Lotze
packages and the modified zope.location fail. Come to think about it, I'm not sure whether and how far I should investigate beyond the ztk for removals like this; are there zope.* packages in the repository that should no longer be cared about at all? I'm +1 on removing it. Done. -- Thomas

Re: [Zope-dev] zope.location.pickling.PathPersistent and BBB

2009-09-16 Thread Thomas Lotze
object to these changes? -- Thomas ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https

[Zope-dev] Zope2 debug-mode vs ZCML dev-mode, ZCML conditionals

2009-09-15 Thread Thomas Lotze
referencing a Python expression defined in a module whose boolean value to use for deciding the condition? -- Thomas ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope2 debug-mode vs ZCML dev-mode, ZCML conditionals

2009-09-15 Thread Thomas Lotze
Andreas Jung wrote: On 15.09.09 08:00, Thomas Lotze wrote: - Is Zope2 debug mode semantically equivalent to ZCML dev-mode, i.e. should the two be linked to each other in the first place? What is the ZCML dev-mode? It's a so-called ZCML feature that can be used with ZCML conditionals

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope2 debug-mode vs ZCML dev-mode, ZCML conditionals

2009-09-15 Thread Thomas Lotze
Andreas Jung wrote: I can not remember having seen any support this feature. If you need it, please add it to the Zope 2 trunk I'll see about it ASAP. (however too late for the Zope 2.12 release, sorry :-)) That's fine. -- Thomas ___ Zope-Dev

Re: [Zope-dev] Python versions supported by the ZTK

2009-09-14 Thread Thomas Lotze
*before* committing their changes. -- Thomas ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce

[Zope-dev] Python versions supported by the ZTK

2009-09-13 Thread Thomas Lotze
What's the oldest Python version the ZTK is supposed to support? 2.4? The ZTK docs don't seem to say anything about this. -- Thomas ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts

Re: [Zope-dev] Python versions supported by the ZTK

2009-09-13 Thread Thomas Lotze
supported versions of Python. Some packages such as zope.testing already do this. -- Thomas ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https

Re: [Zope-dev] zc.buildout, substitution and templating

2009-09-12 Thread Thomas Lotze
Encolpe Degoute wrote: Can I add it in the trunk or does anybody want a branch ? Do it on a branch, even if it seems trivial. At least you'll want to run the tests on different systems before modifying the trunk, which will be easier when you can check the changes out from a branch. -- Thomas

Re: [Zope-dev] Needed: zc.recipe.cmmi release

2009-09-10 Thread Thomas Lotze
Wichert Akkerman wrote: The latest zc.recipe.cmmi release started using the zc.buildout download API but does not depend on zc.buildout 1.4 or later, which broke several buildouts for me. I've fixed the dependency in r103703. Can someone make a new release? Done. -- Thomas

[Zope-dev] zope.location.pickling.PathPersistent and BBB

2009-09-09 Thread Thomas Lotze
that. The class doesn't seem to be used anywhere in Zope, so removing it would rid zope.location of some unused code as well as make it possible to move ITraverser back to zope.traversing where it fits much better conceptionally. What are your opinions on this, does anyone object? -- Thomas

[Zope] apache rules with zope

2009-09-04 Thread Thomas Bennett
error logs. Thanks for any help, Thomas -- == Thomas McMillan Grant Bennett Appalachian State University Operations Systems AnalystP O Box 32026 University LibraryBoone, North Carolina 28608 (828) 262

Re: [Zope-dev] zc.buildout, substitution and templating

2009-09-03 Thread Thomas Lotze
can see with the issue at hand, would only work if all client code handled the encoding consistently. I therefore propose fixing buildout so that it encodes option values when writing .installed.cfg just as it would decode them when reading the file. -- Thomas

Re: [Zope-dev] Move implementation of getParent to zope.location?

2009-08-12 Thread Thomas Lotze
by zope.traversing.api.) -- Thomas ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http

[Zope-dev] Move implementation of getParent to zope.location?

2009-08-04 Thread Thomas Lotze
of ILocationInfo? If there's no good reason, I'd propose adding getParent() to the interface and changing the getParent function in zope.traversing to work similarly to getParents, i.e. call a method on an ILocationInfo adapter. -- Thomas ___ Zope-Dev

[Zope-dev] Zope2 debug-mode vs ZCML dev-mode, ZCML conditionals

2009-08-04 Thread Thomas Lotze
the condition? -- Thomas ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org

[Zope-dev] Creating new five.* package

2009-07-13 Thread Thomas Lotze
We've started a new package, five.hashedresource, that is supposed to integrate z3c.hashedresource into Zope2. Just to make sure not to step on someone's toes: is it OK to just create such a package in that namespace? -- Thomas ___ Zope-Dev maillist

Re: [Zope] psycopg import error

2009-07-01 Thread Thomas OConnor
really)! Keep up the good work. Cheers, Tom -- Thomas O'Connor Web developer (02) 498 54130 thomas.ocon...@newcastle.edu.au Office of IT Services Bar on the Hill Building UoN Services Limited University Drive Callaghan NSW 2308 ___ Zope maillist - Zope

Re: [Zope-dev] Manuel Beta

2009-06-25 Thread Thomas Lotze
suite, mainly in order to have a test suite factory with all the features of the standard (or rather, zope.testing) doc test suite. To have a more elaborate doc file suite available from manuel would also be good. -- Thomas ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope

Re: [Zope] psycopg import error

2009-06-23 Thread Thomas Bennett
psycopg is installed, the library and the DA product. http://initd.org/pub/software/psycopg/ Thomas On Tuesday 23 June 2009 16:06:03 Amir wrote: Hi, I have (Zope 2.9.4-final, python 2.4.3, linux2) and I have used psycopg2.0.11 adapter to connect Zope to Postgresql but I am getting

Re: [Zope] Getting Auto Increment value

2009-06-11 Thread Thomas Bennett
for your serial field. Thomas On Thursday 11 June 2009 08:36:21 Merav Ben-David wrote: I am working with zope mysql. I have a table with SERIAL column type, I create z-sql method for insert operation, how can I get the value for the auto increment column? I know that in mysql I can call

[Zope] Script (python) config

2009-05-18 Thread Joseph Thomas (s)
We upgraded from zope 2.9 to 2.10 and in the process upgraded plone as well. There's script that simply returns a list of groups to which a user belongs. In the old system both users in the system and not in the system (ie ids not in zope) would get HTTP 200 when invoking the script thru a URL

Re: [Zope] is there a zope product for generating spreadsheets?

2009-05-05 Thread Thomas Bennett
focused on Calc and can be used to create OpenDocument Format Calc spreadsheets. Thomas On Monday 04 May 2009 17:07:28 Krishnakant wrote: hello all, I am right now browsing through the grok tutorial and found it to be really amaising. I had been confused a few days regarding how I can

Re: [Zope] sending a encrypted login URL

2009-03-05 Thread Joseph Thomas (s)
1:55 PM To: Joseph Thomas (s) Cc: zope@zope.org Subject: Re: [Zope] sending a encrypted login URL Joseph Thomas (s) wrote at 2009-3-4 10:29 -0600: We'd like to construct a zope login URL of the form on another server: http://zope.domain:port/context/logged_in?__ac_name=uzz__ac_passwo r d

[Zope] sending a encrypted login URL

2009-03-04 Thread Joseph Thomas (s)
when zope receives the request and login the user. Is there an API or some way to encrypt the username and password on the 3rd party app server and configure zope so that it treats the parameters as encrypted values rather than plaintext? Joseph Thomas College of American Pathologists http

[Zope] FW: sending a encrypted login URL

2009-03-04 Thread Joseph Thomas (s)
-Original Message- From: Joseph Thomas (s) Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 10:50 AM To: 'li...@zopyx.com' Subject: RE: [Zope] sending a encrypted login URL I think I get what you're suggesting, but let me clarify. I actually wanted the sensitive portions of URL to be encrypted

Re: [Zope-dev] Standard request/response API

2009-03-02 Thread Thomas Lotze
think of WebOb by Ian Bicking. It defines request and response implementations around WSGI and has evolved from Paste. -- Thomas ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML

[Zope] What am I getting with a plone windows installer?

2009-01-26 Thread Joseph Thomas (s)
wxPython? Joseph Thomas College of American Pathologists http://www.cap.org http://www.cap.org/ Consider our environment; please print this e-mail only if truly necessary. Thank you! ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman

[Zope] Error in python method...

2009-01-13 Thread Joseph Thomas (s)
years 12 periods 4 principal 2.0 Does this indicate an error with my python script? Joseph Thomas College of American Pathologists http://www.cap.org http://www.cap.org/ Consider our environment; please print this e-mail only if truly necessary. Thank you

Re: [Zope] Error in python method...

2009-01-13 Thread Joseph Thomas (s)
, January 13, 2009 1:36 PM To: li...@zopyx.com; Joseph Thomas (s) Cc: zope@zope.org Subject: RE: [Zope] Error in python method... Agreed, if you are going through the learning curve anyway, may as well be the new way. Grok, in fact, may take less time to get into for basic apps. -- Jeffrey D

Re: [Zope-dev] [Checkins] SVN: zc.dict/branches/tlotze-blist/src/zc/dict/ordered.txt added a test to ensure the order is stored in a BList

2008-12-23 Thread Thomas Lotze
Gary Poster gary.pos...@gmail.com schrieb: Hi Thomas. Very cool that you are working on zc.dict + zc.blist. Better than letting that branch get old ;o) The updateOrder API is a sucky API for blists, as I'm sure you've realized. :-) It is sucky even when used with a PersistentList; it's

  1   2   3   >