Re: [Zope] License

2001-01-30 Thread Chris Withers
Bill Anderson wrote: Yeah, that typo really caught me a good laugh too. I should thank Chris for it. :) Just stick it on the Zope Quotes board, can't remember the URL though :-S Jeez, what have I done, I wholeheartedly apologise for even mentioning licenses. Any heard of the web app server

Re: [Zope] License

2001-01-29 Thread Chris Withers
Olaf Zanger wrote: is the product planned to ship under GPL or an corresponding licence? Please don't shit it under GPL, it makes it much less useful :-S A variant of the Zope License would be much mroe friendly :-) cheers, Chris ___ Zope

Re: [Zope] License

2001-01-29 Thread Oleg Broytmann
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Chris Withers wrote: Olaf Zanger wrote: is the product planned to ship under GPL or an corresponding licence? Please don't shit it under GPL, it makes it much less useful :-S A variant of the Zope License would be much mroe friendly :-) OH, NO, PLEASE NOT AGAIN

Re: [Zope] License

2001-01-29 Thread Andrew Kenneth Milton
+---[ Oleg Broytmann ]-- | On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Chris Withers wrote: | Olaf Zanger wrote: | | is the product planned to ship under GPL or an corresponding licence? | | Please don't shit it under GPL, it makes it much less useful :-S | A variant of the Zope License

Re: [Zope] License

2001-01-29 Thread Oleg Broytmann
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Andrew Kenneth Milton wrote: | is the product planned to ship under GPL or an corresponding licence? | | Please don't shit it under GPL, it makes it much less useful :-S | A variant of the Zope License would be much mroe friendly :-) | |OH, NO, PLEASE NOT AGAIN

Re: [Zope] License

2001-01-29 Thread ender
On Monday 29 January 2001 01:41, Chris Withers wrote: Olaf Zanger wrote: is the product planned to ship under GPL or an corresponding licence? Please don't shit it under GPL, it makes it much less useful :-S A variant of the Zope License would be much mroe friendly :-) cheers, Chris

Re: [Zope] License

2001-01-29 Thread Chris Withers
Chris Withers wrote: Please don't shit it under GPL, it makes it much less useful :-S *embarrassed laughs* Man, what a typo... I actually meant ship, beleive it or not. And the reason I asked is 'cos, as I understand it, if I use a GPL-licensed product in a product/solution I provide,

RE: [Zope] License

2001-01-29 Thread Fabrice FRANK
part de ender Envoy : lundi 29 janvier 2001 06:38 : Chris Withers; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc : [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Zope Mailinglist Objet : Re: [Zope] License On Monday 29 January 2001 01:41, Chris Withers wrote: Olaf Zanger wrote: is the product planned to ship under GPL or an corresponding licence

Re: [Zope] License

2001-01-29 Thread Gregor Hoffleit
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 12:58:35PM +, Chris Withers wrote: And the reason I asked is 'cos, as I understand it, if I use a GPL-licensed product in a product/solution I provide, then I have to do that for free and open source it too, which often isn't an option :-( Nope, that's wrong. If

Re: [Zope] License

2001-01-29 Thread Jerome Alet
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Chris Withers wrote: And the reason I asked is 'cos, as I understand it, if I use a GPL-licensed product in a product/solution I provide, then I have to do that for free and open source it too, which often isn't an option :-( Of course you DON'T have to do your work for

Re: [Zope] License

2001-01-29 Thread Andreas Heckel
EVERYTHING SNIPED! PLEASE allow ME to choose the license freely and PLEASE STOP the flamewar on this thread! You can find tons of these licence discussions not only on this list and there is nothing new to say. -- Andreas

[Zope] Ithy Trigger Fingers (was Re: [Zope] License)

2001-01-29 Thread Bill Anderson
Andreas Heckel wrote: EVERYTHING SNIPED! PLEASE allow ME to choose the license freely and PLEASE STOP the flamewar on this thread! You can find tons of these licence discussions not only on this list and there is nothing new to say. Come on people, this is not a flme war. Nobody is

Re: [Zope] License

2001-01-29 Thread Bill Anderson
Fabrice FRANK wrote: I really agree, do NOT change the license terms. Ummm .. the software in questions has _no_ license terms yet. Bill ___ Zope maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross

Re: [Zope] Ithy Trigger Fingers (was Re: [Zope] License)

2001-01-29 Thread Dario Lopez-Kästen
I believe the Horse of Licenses was beaten to death in a recent thread some month(s), if not weeks, ago. May It Rest in Peace. This may be the Second Coming of It, but, with all due respect, License Horses and discussions of Other License's Merits and Flaws are off-topic for this list; I think

Re: [Zope] Ithy Trigger Fingers (was Re: [Zope] License)

2001-01-29 Thread Bill Anderson
Dario Lopez-Ksten wrote: I believe the Horse of Licenses was beaten to death in a recent thread some month(s), if not weeks, ago. May It Rest in Peace. This may be the Second Coming of It, but, with all due respect, License Horses and discussions of Other License's Merits and Flaws are

Re: [Zope] License

2001-01-29 Thread Bill Anderson
Andrew Kenneth Milton wrote: +---[ Bill Anderson ]-- | Fabrice FRANK wrote: | |I really agree, do NOT change the license terms. | | | | Ummm .. the software in questions has _no_ license terms yet. You stifling the right of the individual to