Log message for revision 106529:
The quest for no zope.app dependencies continues on trunk
Changed:
D Zope/branches/2.12/ZOPE_APP_DEPENDENCIES.rst
-=-
Deleted: Zope/branches/2.12/ZOPE_APP_DEPENDENCIES.rst
===
---
Log message for revision 106530:
Updated bootstrap to latest version
Changed:
U Zope/branches/2.12/bootstrap.py
-=-
Modified: Zope/branches/2.12/bootstrap.py
===
--- Zope/branches/2.12/bootstrap.py 2009-12-15 14:41:53
Log message for revision 106531:
Updated bootstrap to latest version
Changed:
U Zope/trunk/bootstrap.py
-=-
Modified: Zope/trunk/bootstrap.py
===
--- Zope/trunk/bootstrap.py 2009-12-15 14:43:43 UTC (rev 106530)
+++
Log message for revision 106534:
Updated a bunch of packages to new bug fix releases
Changed:
U Zope/branches/2.12/doc/CHANGES.rst
U Zope/branches/2.12/versions.cfg
-=-
Modified: Zope/branches/2.12/doc/CHANGES.rst
===
Log message for revision 106544:
PEP8, remove unused imports, normalize docstrings.
Changed:
U Zope/trunk/src/OFS/DTMLMethod.py
-=-
Modified: Zope/trunk/src/OFS/DTMLMethod.py
===
--- Zope/trunk/src/OFS/DTMLMethod.py
Log message for revision 106547:
LP #496941: Remove all mention of ``standard_html_header`` and
``standard_html_footer`` from default DTML content.
Changed:
U Zope/trunk/doc/CHANGES.rst
U Zope/trunk/src/HelpSys/HelpTopic.py
U Zope/trunk/src/OFS/DTMLDocument.py
U
Log message for revision 106550:
LP #496941: Remove all mention of ``standard_html_header`` and
``standard_html_footer`` from default DTML content.
Changed:
U Zope/branches/2.12/doc/CHANGES.rst
U Zope/branches/2.12/src/HelpSys/HelpTopic.py
U
Log message for revision 106557:
Catch up with all of the ZTK, now that zope.site's tests are fixed
Changed:
U Zope/trunk/versions.cfg
-=-
Modified: Zope/trunk/versions.cfg
===
--- Zope/trunk/versions.cfg 2009-12-15
Log message for revision 106572:
Another one bites the dust - Removed the dependency on zope.app.publication
in favor of new versions of zope.publisher and zope.traversing.
Changed:
U Zope/trunk/ZOPE_APP_DEPENDENCIES.rst
U Zope/trunk/buildout.cfg
U Zope/trunk/doc/CHANGES.rst
U
Log message for revision 106573:
The dependency on zope.app.schema had already been removed, but was still
declared.
Changed:
U Zope/trunk/setup.py
-=-
Modified: Zope/trunk/setup.py
===
--- Zope/trunk/setup.py 2009-12-15
Log message for revision 106574:
Clean up the alltests list and note the real zope.browser dependency
Changed:
U Zope/trunk/buildout.cfg
U Zope/trunk/setup.py
-=-
Modified: Zope/trunk/buildout.cfg
===
---
Log message for revision 106575:
Fewer undeclared test dependencies
Changed:
U Zope/trunk/buildout.cfg
-=-
Modified: Zope/trunk/buildout.cfg
===
--- Zope/trunk/buildout.cfg 2009-12-15 20:25:53 UTC (rev 106574)
+++
Log message for revision 106576:
Status update on zope.app removal work
Changed:
U Zope/trunk/ZOPE_APP_DEPENDENCIES.rst
U Zope/trunk/buildout.cfg
-=-
Modified: Zope/trunk/ZOPE_APP_DEPENDENCIES.rst
===
---
Log message for revision 106577:
Openly blame packages with test dependencies from the zope.app realm
Changed:
U Zope/trunk/buildout.cfg
-=-
Modified: Zope/trunk/buildout.cfg
===
--- Zope/trunk/buildout.cfg 2009-12-15
Log message for revision 106593:
We made more progress
Changed:
U Zope/trunk/ZOPE_APP_DEPENDENCIES.rst
-=-
Modified: Zope/trunk/ZOPE_APP_DEPENDENCIES.rst
===
--- Zope/trunk/ZOPE_APP_DEPENDENCIES.rst2009-12-15
Log message for revision 106595:
Follow my idiosyncratic spelling for completed punchlist sub-items.
Changed:
U Zope/trunk/ZOPE_APP_DEPENDENCIES.rst
-=-
Modified: Zope/trunk/ZOPE_APP_DEPENDENCIES.rst
===
---
Log message for revision 106622:
There's been more progress
Changed:
U Zope/trunk/ZOPE_APP_DEPENDENCIES.rst
-=-
Modified: Zope/trunk/ZOPE_APP_DEPENDENCIES.rst
===
--- Zope/trunk/ZOPE_APP_DEPENDENCIES.rst2009-12-16
Log message for revision 106623:
fix bug number typo
Changed:
U Zope/trunk/doc/CHANGES.rst
-=-
Modified: Zope/trunk/doc/CHANGES.rst
===
--- Zope/trunk/doc/CHANGES.rst 2009-12-16 04:29:07 UTC (rev 106622)
+++
And now it's zc.buildout. It also uses itself, to set up the
environment so that you can test it. I did try using distribute
instead, but I get strange inconsistent errors, different ones each
time I try. :-/
If someone can set up a way of running the tests for zc.buildout
without using
Hi,
to get generations working in Zope 2 the following subscriber is needed:
@zope.component.adapter(zope.app.appsetup.IProcessStartingEvent)
def evolve_minimum(event):
zope.app.generations.generations.evolve(
Zope2.DB, zope.app.generations.generations.EVOLVEMINIMUM)
I think should
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:02, Christian Zagrodnick c...@gocept.com wrote:
Hi,
to get generations working in Zope 2 the following subscriber is needed:
@zope.component.adapter(zope.app.appsetup.IProcessStartingEvent)
def evolve_minimum(event):
zope.app.generations.generations.evolve(
On 12/15/09 11:02 , Christian Zagrodnick wrote:
Hi,
to get generations working in Zope 2 the following subscriber is needed:
@zope.component.adapter(zope.app.appsetup.IProcessStartingEvent)
def evolve_minimum(event):
zope.app.generations.generations.evolve(
Zope2.DB,
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:20, Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net wrote:
-1, this would add a needless dependency on zope.app.generations to Zope
2 as far as I can see.
Good point. The lack of imports tricked me into thinking this was
easier than it was. :)
--
Lennart Regebro:
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Mon Dec 14 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Tue Dec 15 12:00:00 2009 UTC.
There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Mon Dec 14 20:38:30 EST 2009
URL:
On 2009-12-15 11:20:19 +0100, Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net said:
On 12/15/09 11:02 , Christian Zagrodnick wrote:
Hi,
to get generations working in Zope 2 the following subscriber is needed:
@zope.component.adapter(zope.app.appsetup.IProcessStartingEvent)
def evolve_minimum(event):
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:22:03AM +0100, Lennart Regebro wrote:
And now it's zc.buildout. It also uses itself, to set up the
environment so that you can test it. I did try using distribute
instead, but I get strange inconsistent errors, different ones each
time I try. :-/
If someone can
On 12/15/09 2:21 PM, Marius Gedminas wrote:
If I weren't extremely hungry and starving, I'd run the tests in the official
fashion (bin/buildout bin/test) and see if I get the same failures.
Be sure to look at DEVELOPERS.txt in the root (you need pythons without
setuptools and you need to run
* Wolfgang Schnerring w...@gocept.com [2009-12-07 08:53]:
The minimal reproduction recipe to see the error is this:
class Slotted(object):
__slots__ = ('__provides__')
zope.component.provideAdapter(
lambda x: True, (Slotted,), zope.interface.Interface)
I'll try
So we've decided to let interfaces grow `adapt` and `utility` methods. I've
written a simple and straight-forward implementation of them (see the
tlotze-component-API branches of zope.interface and zope.component) that is
closely modelled on the exisiting `__call__`. In particular, the new methods
Hi all,
I just re-released zc.recipe.wrapper. The previous release lacked a
corresponding svn tag. This release fixes that, and should be
otherwise unremarkable.
--
Alex Smith
Software Engineer
Zope Corporation
___
Zope-Dev maillist -
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 14:21, Marius Gedminas mar...@gedmin.as wrote:
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:22:03AM +0100, Lennart Regebro wrote:
And now it's zc.buildout. It also uses itself, to set up the
environment so that you can test it. I did try using distribute
instead, but I get strange
Am Dienstag 15 Dezember 2009 17:16:12 schrieb Thomas Lotze:
So we've decided to let interfaces grow `adapt` and `utility` methods. I've
written a simple and straight-forward implementation of them (see the
tlotze-component-API branches of zope.interface and zope.component) that is
closely
Funny you should mention this, I've got this idea bugging for a few
weeks now, after the last thread:
Have the zope.interface package expose a single overridable hook:
def getInterfaceAttribute(iface, name, default):
This method would be called by any attempt to look up an interface
attribute
Hey,
Good to see there's progress!
Thomas Lotze wrote:
[snip]
Except that I don't like the implications now that I have actually written
down the code. I'll describe the problem I see and then suggest an idea that I
don't think we've been considering in the discussion two weeks ago:
We're
I wonder if maybe something like (notionally):
class InterfaceBase(object):
@classmethod
def add_more_api(cls, **kw):
cls.__dict__.update(kw)
- C
Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote:
Funny you should mention this, I've got this idea bugging for a few
weeks now, after the last
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote:
Funny you should mention this, I've got this idea bugging for a few
weeks now, after the last thread:
Have the zope.interface package expose a single overridable hook:
def getInterfaceAttribute(iface, name,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Log message for revision 106536:
Include distribute, so we can use it in presence of the
allow-picked-versions=false
Changed:
U zopetoolkit/trunk/ztk.cfg
-=-
Modified: zopetoolkit/trunk/ztk.cfg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Tres Seaver wrote:
* The hook invokes the `query*` functions to play nice with any other
component hooks and the interface methods raise a TypeError if all of
them
fail to find a component.
A TypeError instead of a
Tres Seaver wrote:
+1 to TypeError: nobody really cares about the type of the error: code
that wants to be robust about a failure uses the 'query' methods. As
long as the message is informative enough (which ComponentLookupError
isn't, really) we should be fine. If we made CLE derive from
Martijn Faassen wrote:
* The hook invokes the `query*` functions to play nice with any other
component hooks and the interface methods raise a TypeError if all of
them fail to find a component.
A TypeError instead of a ComponentLookupError?
I was thinking we should keep the behavior
Hi,
Most of the source distribution packages of ZTK are
in .tar.gz format. But there are few exceptions.
For consistency, can we use .tar.gz format for all releases ?
PEP 8: A Foolish Consistency is the Hobgoblin of Little Minds
Regards,
Baiju M
On 2009-12-16 08:35, Baiju M wrote:
Hi,
Most of the source distribution packages of ZTK are
in .tar.gz format. But there are few exceptions.
For consistency, can we use .tar.gz format for all releases ?
Once there is a python 2.4 release which fixes the tarfile bug, or once
python 2.4
On 12/15/2009 11:32 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
Given that the choice to use __call__ is not widely enough accepted, I
think something like your solution makes sense. I'm not sure that
hooking __getattr__ is going to be performant enough, but a similar
mechanism probably could be made fast enough.
This seems to be happening on more than just one query now... is there any
suggestion on where to look?
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Justin Dunsworth
justin.dunswo...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the reply... Are you suggesting that there may be an issue with
MySQL receiving the data from
I forgot to add version:
Zope 2.11.4-final, python 2.4.4, win32 and using ZMySQLDA 2.0.9
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Justin Dunsworth
justin.dunswo...@gmail.com wrote:
This seems to be happening on more than just one query now... is there any
suggestion on where to look?
On Thu, Dec
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Please re-read my answer.
Andreas
schrieb Justin Dunsworth:
This seems to be happening on more than just one query now... is
there any suggestion on where to look?
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Justin Dunsworth
justin.dunswo...@gmail.com
Investigating further the page is actually being posted twice. This was due
to javascript and not the database, transactions, or otherwise.
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Andreas Jung li...@zopyx.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Please re-read my answer.
Andreas
Let me take this a bit further and I hate spamming but if any other person
that has a similar issue can refer to...
I simplified a page and all it's dependencies and added code back one by
one. It eventually ended up coming down to one tag that was switching
browser modes and POSTed twice.
hello,im donald evans.evansdonal...@yahoo.com. i would LOVE to know computer
basics! I'M VERY AMBITIOUS. AND HAVE THOUSANDS OF EMAILS.OVER 90% OF THEM
[ARE] FOR ONLINE OPPERTUNITIES. AND IVE BEEN TAKEN FOR A FEW RIDE'S/RIP OFF
OFFER'S OR THAY WERE REAL. I JUUST DIDENT KNOW HOW TO SET
+---[ Donald Evans ]--
| hello,im donald evans.evansdonal...@yahoo.com. i would LOVE to know computer
| basics! I'M VERY AMBITIOUS. AND HAVE THOUSANDS OF EMAILS.OVER 90% OF THEM
| [ARE] FOR ONLINE OPPERTUNITIES. AND IVE BEEN TAKEN FOR A FEW RIDE'S/RIP OFF
| OFFER'S
50 matches
Mail list logo
