Re: [Zope] 'Offline' mailhost

2000-10-09 Thread Jan H. Haul
Michael Bernstein wrote: "Jan H. Haul" wrote: Each of these will be around 42 KByte large. Huh? Why that? you ask. Because in the header of each mail, the whole recipient list will be listed under To: or Cc: [snip] - privacy: You would not like to have "your" recipients end up

Re: [Zope] 'Offline' mailhost

2000-10-07 Thread Jan H. Haul
Terry Kerr wrote: Chris Withers wrote: Hannu Krosing wrote: Also you could send just one message to all the recipients instead of sending individual messages. Urm, they could be pretty unfriendly mail messages if they're being sent to a coupla thousand people. The bandwidth

Re: [Zope] 'Offline' mailhost

2000-10-07 Thread Michael Bernstein
"Jan H. Haul" wrote: Each of these will be around 42 KByte large. Huh? Why that? you ask. Because in the header of each mail, the whole recipient list will be listed under To: or Cc: [snip] - privacy: You would not like to have "your" recipients end up on other people's mailing lists

Re: [Zope] 'Offline' mailhost

2000-10-04 Thread Hannu Krosing
Chris Withers wrote: Shane Hathaway wrote: I'm not sure how well MailHost scales, but you can certainly store thousands of names in a ZODB-managed list. Tests done for the BTreeFolder product prove it. Sadly, I think MailHost doesn't scale too well :-( What it'd need to do if

Re: [Zope] 'Offline' mailhost

2000-10-04 Thread Chris Withers
Hannu Krosing wrote: Perhaps it would be better to solve this by configuring your sendmail (or other SMTP MTA) to be non-blocking, i.e. store-and-forward. Can you tell me how to set that up with exim? Also you could send just one message to all the recipients instead of sending individual

Re: [Zope] 'Offline' mailhost

2000-10-04 Thread Ken Manheimer
On Wed, 4 Oct 2000, Hannu Krosing wrote: Perhaps it would be better to solve this by configuring your sendmail (or other SMTP MTA) to be non-blocking, i.e. store-and-forward. This seems like a good idea. It makes it hard to get disposition status for the delivery in the transaction - but

Re: [Zope] 'Offline' mailhost

2000-10-04 Thread Bill Welch
Techniques for effeciently sending a message to a large number of recipients are covered extensively in majordomo documentation - www.greatcircle.com/majordomo. Also check out ftp://cs.utk.edu/pub/moore/bulk_mailer Bill. On Wed, 4 Oct 2000, Chris Withers wrote: Also you could send just one

Re: [Zope] 'Offline' mailhost

2000-10-04 Thread Terry Kerr
Chris Withers wrote: Hannu Krosing wrote: Perhaps it would be better to solve this by configuring your sendmail (or other SMTP MTA) to be non-blocking, i.e. store-and-forward. Can you tell me how to set that up with exim? Also you could send just one message to all the recipients

[Zope] 'Offline' mailhost

2000-10-03 Thread Chris Withers
Shane Hathaway wrote: I'm not sure how well MailHost scales, but you can certainly store thousands of names in a ZODB-managed list. Tests done for the BTreeFolder product prove it. Sadly, I think MailHost doesn't scale too well :-( What it'd need to do if you're sending the mail to a few