Andreas Jung wrote:
The question is: what is easier to learn and to understand - DTML or ZPT?
The correct answer is, of course, Twiddler ;-)
http://www.simplistix.co.uk/software/python/twiddler
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope Python Consulting
-
--On 9. Januar 2007 07:47:28 + Chris Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
The question is: what is easier to learn and to understand - DTML or ZPT?
The correct answer is, of course, Twiddler ;-)
http://www.simplistix.co.uk/software/python/twiddler
Yes, you
Andreas Jung wrote at 2007-1-8 19:08 +0100:
...
The question is: what is easier to learn and to understand - DTML or ZPT?
Can you explain the nonsense of the _ namespace in DTML to a newbie?
Sure.
There is only one caveat: that two positional arguments need to
be passed for recursive calls of
As for me, I am lazy. ZPT does things in a way that few other frameworks do,
although Ruby's Amrita2 sort of resembles ZPT.
Displaying phantom text in a static page which will
not be there dynamically is not superior to DTML.
It is just more confusing. I have never learned ZPT
well and I
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 08:31:29PM +0100, Maciej Wisniowski wrote:
As for me, I am lazy. ZPT does things in a way that few other frameworks do,
although Ruby's Amrita2 sort of resembles ZPT.
Not really. It's more closely related to the Meld family (pymeld,
pymeldlite, meld3), and to XMLC.
Why (the hell) are you (still) using DTML (as newbie). You are strongly
encouraged to use ZPT.
My sense is that ZPT solves a problem which for most of us does not exist. If
you wish to have designers work directly on markup in an HTML WYSIWYG editor
then yes, ZPT is great.
But most of us
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 01/08/2007 01:01:26 PM:
Why (the hell) are you (still) using DTML (as newbie). You are
strongly
encouraged to use ZPT.
My sense is that ZPT solves a problem which for most of us does not
exist. If you wish to have designers work directly on markup in an
HTML
--On 8. Januar 2007 13:01:26 -0500 Mark, Jonathan (Integic)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why (the hell) are you (still) using DTML (as newbie). You are strongly
encouraged to use ZPT.
My sense is that ZPT solves a problem which for most of us does not
exist. If you wish to have designers work
Aloha,
Mark, Jonathan (Integic) wrote:
What does matter is that DTML is very similar to RHTML (as in Ruby On
Rails), ASP, etc. ZPT requires a new way of thinking. I would much
rather convert RHTML to or from DTML than to or from ZPT.
So I don't really get the benefit of using ZPT. The fact
