[Zope] Re: Zope 2 and Zope 3

2007-02-15 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen
Geoff Gerrietts wrote: [some paragraphs about scaling which I can't really comment on] As for source control, I figure all of your code (DTML, yuck) is in the ZODB. This went out of fashion a long time ago, most serious development happens on the filesystem (in Python packages) which can

Re: [Zope] Re: Zope 2 and Zope 3

2007-02-15 Thread Paul Winkler
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 11:50:38AM +0100, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: What's already possible is to have a minimal ZODB with only one persistent object: a SQLObject or SQLAlchemy container. That's a container (e.g. like a folder) whose items aren't persisted in the ZODB but come from a

[Zope] Re: Zope 2 and Zope 3

2007-02-14 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen
Geoff Gerrietts wrote: I have a couple questions about the current game plan for Zope development that I was unable to answer for myself by searching through mailing list archives and the zope.org http://zope.org website. I hope my inability to answer them is not merely a symptom of poor

[Zope] Re: Zope 2 and Zope 3

2007-02-14 Thread Geoff Gerrietts
On 2/14/07, Philipp von Weitershausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There will definitely be a Zope 2.11 and at this point I see no reason why there shouldn't be a Zope 2.12. We (the Zope Community, not necessarily Zope Corporation) will maintain Zope 2 as long as it's necessary. Maintaining in this