Andrew Sawyers schrieb:
I'm a little confused, if that's the whole point, not sure what the
point is. Perhaps I jumped the gun by replying :).
I guess I would setup a local procmail rule or posfix rule to not accept
mail with these attachments? If the mail is not going through the zope
mailser
I'm a little confused, if that's the whole point, not sure what the
point is. Perhaps I jumped the gun by replying :).
I guess I would setup a local procmail rule or posfix rule to not accept
mail with these attachments? If the mail is not going through the zope
mailservers, I'm not sure how one
Andrew Sawyers schrieb:
IIRC, all of the zope mailing lists only accept mail from subscribers -
so these are likely just someone spoofing the sender address. No reason
to try and handle this on the list server side IMNSHO.
Of course they are. Thats the whole point :-) On which side do you thin
IIRC, all of the zope mailing lists only accept mail from subscribers -
so these are likely just someone spoofing the sender address. No reason
to try and handle this on the list server side IMNSHO.
Andrew
On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 12:37 +0100, Tino Wildenhain wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm getting bounces of
On 1/17/06, Tino Wildenhain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alternatively the ability to register trusted
> MTAs with an address could help and would be completely
> transparent for those who dont care.
Unfortunately the nature of open source communities around a domain
name is such that locking down
Martijn Pieters schrieb:
On 1/17/06, Tino Wildenhain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alternatively the ability to register trusted
MTAs with an address could help and would be completely
transparent for those who dont care.
Unfortunately the nature of open source communities around a domain
name
Jens Vagelpohl schrieb:
...
What exactly would that do? Would you want to force everyone to use gpg
keys? Sounds just a bit unrealistic.
Yes, I feared it. After all it was just an idea.
Alternatively the ability to register trusted
MTAs with an address could help and would be completely
tra
On 1/17/06, Tino Wildenhain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm getting bounces of messages sent to zope@zope.org
> with aparently large binary attachments. Luckily they
> are too big to get thru automatically.
The bounces themselves are fake perhaps? Why would you get bounces
otherwise; you are not
On 17 Jan 2006, at 11:37, Tino Wildenhain wrote:
Hi,
I'm getting bounces of messages sent to zope@zope.org
with aparently large binary attachments. Luckily they
are too big to get thru automatically.
Looks like spammers are around and faking identities.
Is it possible to enhance the list sof
Hi,
I'm getting bounces of messages sent to zope@zope.org
with aparently large binary attachments. Luckily they
are too big to get thru automatically.
Looks like spammers are around and faking identities.
Is it possible to enhance the list software to check
gpg keys of posts?
Just an idea...
10 matches
Mail list logo