Am Mittwoch, 18. Oktober 2006 22:03 schrieb Doyon, Jean-Francois:
The big problem I have is determining file types without having
file extensions, since many objects are name with a simple id that
doesn't contain a typical file extension.
This makes it supremely difficult to determine viewing
--On 19. Oktober 2006 12:34:28 +0200 Sascha Ottolski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 18. Oktober 2006 22:03 schrieb Doyon, Jean-Francois:
The big problem I have is determining file types without having
file extensions, since many objects are name with a simple id that
doesn't contain
solutions!
Thanks for the idea though ...
J.F.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sascha Ottolski
Sent: October 19, 2006 6:34 AM
To: zope@zope.org
Subject: Re: [Zope] Zope and Log File Analysis
Am Mittwoch, 18. Oktober 2006 22:03 schrieb
: Re: [Zope] Zope and Log File Analysis
--On 19. Oktober 2006 12:34:28 +0200 Sascha Ottolski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 18. Oktober 2006 22:03 schrieb Doyon, Jean-Francois:
The big problem I have is determining file types without having
file extensions, since many objects are name
--On 19. Oktober 2006 08:07:37 -0400 Doyon, Jean-Francois
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
H, but said headers wouldn't be sufficient, unless I set custom ones
for each (CMF, in my case) content type.
Why wouldn't that help? A logged header image/gif or image/jpeg is
clearly an indicator for
Hi,
Doyon, Jean-Francois wrote:
Ah yes, indeed, I could do custom logging ... But then I'd have to worry
about the performance impact, the fact that because these logs would be
custom, I'd need custom analysis tools as well (unless I can make it
compatible somehow?) ... And so on ...
To: Doyon, Jean-Francois; zope@zope.org
Subject: RE: [Zope] Zope and Log File Analysis
--On 19. Oktober 2006 08:07:37 -0400 Doyon, Jean-Francois
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
H, but said headers wouldn't be sufficient, unless I set custom
ones for each (CMF, in my case) content type.
Why
