> > My configuration looks like this:
> >
> > ProxyRequests On
What do you need ProxyRequests for?
On my machine, they are off, and it works.
> > ProxyPassReverse /paginas/ http://200.xxx.xxx.xxx:8080/
> > ProxyPassReverse /p_/ http://200.xxx.xxx.xxx:8080/p_/
> > ProxyPassReverse /misc_/ http:/
Christiano Anderson wrote:
> Do you have any example of the best Apache and ProxyCache configuration to
> running zope?
>
> My configuration looks like this:
>
>
> ProxyRequests On
> #ProxyReceiveBufferSize 65536
> ProxyReceiveBufferSize 0
> CacheRoot "/www/proxycache"
> CacheSize 5000
> Cache
Why do you see any need to turn ProxyRequests On?
I run the ProxyPass too, but there is no need for the ProxyRequest and the
Proxy module. Perhaps there lies your problem.
-goe-
>My configuration looks like this:
>
>
>ProxyRequests On
>#ProxyReceiveBufferSize 65536
>ProxyReceiveBufferSize 0
>Ca
t;J. Atwood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2000 4:14 PM
> Subject: Re: [Zope] Zope is very slow!
>
> > We did some pretty heavy performance testing of a particar application
> comparing
> > 2.1.6 and 2.2.0 and 2.2.0 wa
>
> > From: Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Organization: New Information Paradigms
> > Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 17:15:57 +0100
> > To: Andy McKay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Cc: "J. Atwood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > S
ent: Thursday, August 17, 2000 4:14 PM
Subject: Re: [Zope] Zope is very slow!
> We did some pretty heavy performance testing of a particar application
comparing
> 2.1.6 and 2.2.0 and 2.2.0 was slower in most cases. The testing was done
on a
> Celeron533 128Meg RAM running RH6.1.
>
>
Hi J,
Thanks a lot for replying my message! :)
Do you have any example of the best Apache and ProxyCache configuration to
running zope?
My configuration looks like this:
ProxyRequests On
#ProxyReceiveBufferSize 65536
ProxyReceiveBufferSize 0
CacheRoot "/www/proxycache"
CacheSize 5000
CacheGc
. I suggest trying that and seeing if it makes a difference.
J
> From: Christiano Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 14:36:42 -0300 (BRT)
> To: "J. Atwood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Zope] Zope is very slow
> I am pretty sure (61%) that in the original release of 2.2.0 there was
> something about a speed increase. One talked about on single processor
> (20-40%) and the other was dual processor (60-80%). It partly
> has to do with
> that "one line of magic code" in the z2.py.
>
> Ethan? Paul? DC? Ca
re to shed some light?
J
> From: Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Organization: New Information Paradigms
> Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 17:15:57 +0100
> To: Andy McKay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "J. Atwood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subj
Andy McKay wrote:
>
> > Upgrade to 2.2.1 (60% faster on dual processors).
>
> Really? I didnt see anything about this in the Changes file... has something
> else changed I didnt see? I noticed that 2.1.6 wasnt making the best use of
> dual processors.
I thought only ZEO would make good use fo d
> Upgrade to 2.2.1 (60% faster on dual processors).
Really? I didnt see anything about this in the Changes file... has something
else changed I didnt see? I noticed that 2.1.6 wasnt making the best use of
dual processors.
--
Andy McKay, Developer, ActiveState
http://www.ActiveState.com
Hi Christiano (nice first message... :) )
First of all, lets define slow. What does slow mean? Have you tested it with
AB (apachebench)? You sure it is not your connection? Watched it in TOP? My
guess is that with 2.1.6 (straight) on that system you should be able to get
about 200 requests per s
13 matches
Mail list logo
