Since this particular bug should be circumventable (new word?) by
using Five 1.3.1, it's not serious enough to warrant a release by
itself, IMO.
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Sun Jan 8 12:01:01 2006 UTC to Mon Jan 9 12:01:01 2006 UTC.
There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Unit Tests.
Test failures
-
Subject: FAILED (errors=2) : Zope-2_8-branch Python-2.3.5 :
Linux
From: Zope Unit Tests
Date: Sun
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope branches 2.9 2.4 Linux
zc-buildbot.
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/
Build Reason: changes
Build Source Stamp: 2687
Blamelist: Zen,andreasjung,jim,oestermeier,yuppie
BUILD FAILED: failed test
sincerely,
-The Buildbot
[Jeff Kowalczyk]
What does the twice-annual release policy say about bugs and/or packaging
errors that are identified and fixed within a very short time of the
official release announcement?
I think the answer you're looking for is that the policy says nothing
about that. Every-6-months
Andreas Jung wrote:
the zLOG module will be offically deprecated in Zope 2.10 (removed in
Zope 2.12). New code _must_ use the 'logging' module of Python. And
please help
to replace all outstanding code that uses the zLOG module on the _trunk_
(which is a fun job :-|).
If that is the case
--On 9. Januar 2006 16:35:31 +0100 Florent Guillaume [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If that is the case then I intend to:
1. move the definitions of zope's specific levels (trace and blather)
into a more prominent place (ZODB also defines these levels, but it has
to be an independent package),
On 1/9/06, Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ZODB defines these levels but I can not see any code in the ZODB package
that actually uses these levels.
Nobody should be using the zLOG levels with the logging package, but
rather use the logging package levels. So in the end, there's no need
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Log message for revision 41225:
Sanely deprecate StructuredText by making it a facade of zope.structuredtext.
Just to make sure: we didn't lose the ReST allowed arbitrary file includes
bugfix by doing this?
Florent
--
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris,
[Andreas Jung]
ZODB defines these levels but I can not see any code in the ZODB package
that actually uses these levels.
Nevertheless, grep'ing the ZODB source for TRACE and BLATHER will find them.
TRACE is used only in modules under ZEO/zrpc/, and gives extremely verbose
output about
--On 9. Januar 2006 10:55:21 -0500 Fred Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/9/06, Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ZODB defines these levels but I can not see any code in the ZODB package
that actually uses these levels.
Nobody should be using the zLOG levels with the logging
--On 9. Januar 2006 17:00:13 +0100 Florent Guillaume [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Log message for revision 41225:
Sanely deprecate StructuredText by making it a facade of
zope.structuredtext.
Just to make sure: we didn't lose the ReST allowed arbitrary
On 9 Jan 2006, at 16:55, Fred Drake wrote:
On 1/9/06, Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ZODB defines these levels but I can not see any code in the ZODB
package
that actually uses these levels.
Nobody should be using the zLOG levels with the logging package, but
rather use the logging
[Fred Drake]
Nobody should be using the zLOG levels with the logging package, but
rather use the logging package levels. So in the end, there's no need
for Zope to be defining levels at all, only conventions for how the
levels are used.
The logging package supports defining as many
On 1/9/06, Florent Guillaume [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My point is that the python logging levels are insufficiently fine
grained.
The python logging framework leaves room for numeric levels and
registering equivalent strings, and indeed ZODB and zLOG have them
defined.
I want to use them.
--On 9. Januar 2006 17:06:25 +0100 Florent Guillaume [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My point is that the python logging levels are insufficiently fine
grained.
Sufficently enough for me. BLATHER TRACE can be merged to DEBUG
and PROBLEM to either WARN|ERROR. This should be even enough for Zope.
On 9 Jan 2006, at 17:03, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 9. Januar 2006 17:00:13 +0100 Florent Guillaume [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Log message for revision 41225:
Sanely deprecate StructuredText by making it a facade of
zope.structuredtext.
Just to make sure:
On 9 Jan 2006, at 17:25, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 9. Januar 2006 17:06:25 +0100 Florent Guillaume [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
My point is that the python logging levels are insufficiently fine
grained.
Sufficently enough for me.
Sufficient for me is not a good reason sorry. If you don't want
On 9 Jan 2006, at 17:20, Fred Drake wrote:
On 1/9/06, Florent Guillaume [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My point is that the python logging levels are insufficiently fine
grained.
The python logging framework leaves room for numeric levels and
registering equivalent strings, and indeed ZODB and zLOG
--On 9. Januar 2006 17:40:26 +0100 Florent Guillaume [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9 Jan 2006, at 17:25, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 9. Januar 2006 17:06:25 +0100 Florent Guillaume [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
My point is that the python logging levels are insufficiently fine
grained.
Sufficently
Andreas Jung wrote at 2006-1-8 22:14 +0100:
...
If you deprecate zLOG could you please instruct the python logger
to output Zope style tracebacks?
Zope style tracebacks are much more informative than the stupid
Python ones.
As this is probably difficult without Monkey patching,
I
--On 9. Januar 2006 20:06:09 +0100 Dieter Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We'll have to check that. Support in terms of patches are welcome :-)
The Zope specific interface for logging purposes is already there:
You just want to deprecate and remove it.
_We_ want to _cleanup_ things. The
Jonathan escribió:
To pour fuel on the flames...
+1 DTML
-1 ZPT
Why...
1) For 'quick and dirty' demos and rapid application prototyping DTML
does the trick (yes, even including ZClasses), it is fast, easy,
reasonably robust and it works!
2) For 'heavy lifting' (ie. intense
On 9 Jan 2006, at 13:29, Garito wrote:
13 KB deleted
Please clean up the subject line to remove your spam filter's
markings before you reply. And don't quote a whole long discussion
including countless message footers only to add one line to the bottom.
Thanks!
jens
hi,
I just downloaded Zope-2.9.0.tgz and in the README.txt it says:
Installation information can be found in ''doc/INSTALL.txt'' this
apparently must read ''Zope/doc/INSTALL.txt''
--
Mit freundlichen GrüßenJoachim Schmitz
already fixed
--On 9. Januar 2006 15:22:49 +0100 Joachim Schmitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
I just downloaded Zope-2.9.0.tgz and in the README.txt it says:
Installation information can be found in ''doc/INSTALL.txt'' this
apparently must read ''Zope/doc/INSTALL.txt''
--
Mit freundlichen
We use a Psycopg connection, and Z SQL Objects... We don't have any
programs written in python that use zope interfaces and so on.
We have a entire site written in DTML in Zope 2.x. Now, after some
discuss here We want to migrate it to Zope3.x. and start to develop
using the zope 3 facilities and
On 1/9/06, Fernando Lujan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We use a Psycopg connection, and Z SQL Objects... We don't have any
programs written in python that use zope interfaces and so on.
We have a entire site written in DTML in Zope 2.x. Now, after some
discuss here We want to migrate it to
Oh, I forgot:
http://blogs.nuxeo.com/sections/blogs/lennart_regebro/2005_10_04_zope2-vs-zope3-faq
___
Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
--On 9. Januar 2006 12:41:46 -0200 Fernando Lujan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I already install Zope 3.1.0 and try to copy the Data.fs.
From where to where?
But it
produces a lot of erros. How can I handle this?
Which errors?
-aj
pgp3kkoNEODbX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 12:41:46PM -0200, Fernando Lujan wrote:
We use a Psycopg connection, and Z SQL Objects... We don't have any
programs written in python that use zope interfaces and so on.
We have a entire site written in DTML in Zope 2.x. Now, after some
discuss here We want to
Tim,
Thanks for compiling that and setting up the windows installer.
However, I don't believe it works. Sorry it took me so long to get
back to you. I wanted to try installing this on a second computer
before I wrote back. On both of them it starts the cmd window and
displays the command called
I am involved in maintaining a remote Zope site that is behind a
firewall where I have no remote access.
I have a (parallel) site that I use to test changes and upgrades that
is accessible to me. I am a looking for a straightforward way to
package tested changes, send and have changes applied at
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 10:15:41AM -0500, Brian Sullivan wrote:
I am involved in maintaining a remote Zope site that is behind a
firewall where I have no remote access.
I have a (parallel) site that I use to test changes and upgrades that
is accessible to me. I am a looking for a
We use a separete lib directory containing versioned Zope Product
directories. That's versioned as in the directory name reflects the
version. These get symlinked into the actual Products directory. For
example:
lib/Foo-1.10.1
lib/Bar-2.2.3
lib/Bar-2.2.4
and in the Products directory a
On 1/9/06, Paul Winkler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 10:15:41AM -0500, Brian Sullivan wrote:
I am involved in maintaining a remote Zope site that is behind a
firewall where I have no remote access.
I have a (parallel) site that I use to test changes and upgrades that
On 1/9/06, Martijn Pieters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We use a separete lib directory containing versioned Zope Product
directories. That's versioned as in the directory name reflects the
version. These get symlinked into the actual Products directory. For
example:
lib/Foo-1.10.1
[Robert Conner]
Thanks for compiling that and setting up the windows installer.
However, I don't believe it works. Sorry it took me so long to get
back to you. I wanted to try installing this on a second computer
before I wrote back. On both of them it
What is it? Please spell out exactly
Well color me purple, it does work.
I was just so used to seeing the Zope Ready to handle Requests
message that when it never appeared I just assumed it was not working
at all. I've broken Zope on my computer 100 times and always when its
broken it does not display Zope Ready to handle Requests.
[Robert Conner]
Well color me purple, it does work.
Good! How could anything on Windows fail to work ;-)?
I was just so used to seeing the Zope Ready to handle Requests
message that when it never appeared I just assumed it was not working
at all. I've broken Zope on my computer 100 times
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 10:39:01AM -0500, Brian Sullivan wrote:
On 1/9/06, Paul Winkler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 10:15:41AM -0500, Brian Sullivan wrote:
I am involved in maintaining a remote Zope site that is behind a
firewall where I have no remote access.
I
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 12:24:57PM -0500, Brian Sullivan wrote:
I considered Zsyncher a while ago -- the problem there though is that
there are many things in the two sites that should not be synched --
it seemed more of a synch everything kind of tool. Maybe I should look
at it again. That
On 1/9/06, Paul Winkler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 12:24:57PM -0500, Brian Sullivan wrote:
I considered Zsyncher a while ago -- the problem there though is that
there are many things in the two sites that should not be synched --
it seemed more of a synch everything
2006/1/9, Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I already install Zope 3.1.0 and try to copy the Data.fs.
From where to where?
From /home/zope/zope2.0/var/Data.fs to /home/zope/zope3.0/var/
But it
produces a lot of erros. How can I handle this?
Which errors?
Hi Andreas,
Thanks for the
2006/1/9, Fernando Lujan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2006/1/9, Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Which errors?
Hi Andreas,
Thanks for the reply. :)
This behavior is intriguer since we only use DTML with logic and
stuff... Nothing special as our own products etc... We sure have some
products, but it
robert rottermann wrote at 2006-1-9 05:45 +0100:
Some customer of ours created got after doing some edition in plone the
following trace backs
which I have no clue what could be the reason.
Only a restart of Zeo/Zope did fix it.
We are using Zope 2.8.5 on linux
What could be the reason for
FWIW, I don't know why Zope doesn't display anything useful in the
console anymore, and I don't even know whether that's unique to
Windows.
Standard output is not a debug/error output.
runzope both in Windows or Linux gives what you need.
--
A powerfull GroupWare, CMS, CRM, ECM: CPS (Open
At Sunday 8/1/2006 11:47, Daniel Gross wrote:
Thank you for your reply. Actually, i first installed and configured
plone/zope on a local server at home. Due to problems with dynamic ip
mapping i decided to move it to a hosted environment. It appears however
that unfortunately i can't do it,
Hello,
i'm building a site to sell images (this is the concept, the reality is
different...).
All the images are in a directory mapped through LocalFS product.
For every image i have a record in a SQL table with all the basic
informations: author, name of the file, cost.
What i haven't
Bruno Grampa wrote:
Hello,
i'm building a site to sell images (this is the concept, the reality is
different...).
All the images are in a directory mapped through LocalFS product.
For every image i have a record in a SQL table with all the basic
informations: author, name of the file, cost.
--On 9. Januar 2006 16:04:28 -0800 David H [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe you can better explain your question.
...especially with such a sense-free subject as Help me.
-aj
pgpWZTTahPYXo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Zope maillist -
Hi list,
Im just wondering what the wisdom is about Zope performance and various
CPU types. I'm running Zope on Linux (Ubuntu). I notice that Dell is
selling a dual-core Pentium unit. But I have no idea if something
like dual core is advantegous to Zope, python execution or one's
--On 9. Januar 2006 21:38:15 -0800 David H [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi list,
Im just wondering what the wisdom is about Zope performance and various
CPU types. I'm running Zope on Linux (Ubuntu). I notice that Dell is
selling a dual-core Pentium unit. But I have no idea if something
like
I am pleased to announce the release of TextIndexNG V 3.1.4.
TextIndexNG V 3 is a complete new implementation based on Zope 3
technologies and can be used both in Zope 2.8 or in Zope 3.
What's new?
- multi-field indexing and query support
- multi-lingual support
- configurable converters
On 2006-01-07 at 03:21:06 [+0100], Laurentiu Traineanu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
When I change on the Security tab of the index_html method, the View
permission from Acquire to Authenticated I do receive the Login
Required page from domains/mydomain/acl_users and the Contents tab, DTML
54 matches
Mail list logo
