Re: [Zope] Mod_Rewrite port 8080
Bobby schrieb: > Hi, > > I want to use mod_rewrite on Apache to redirect http://internal:80/internal > to http://internal:8080/internal so that when the user request > http://internal:80/internal, the Zope folder foo will be served up. I still > want http://internal:80/ to stay intact so that the contents from port 80 > will still be served; just the http://internal:80/internal to point to the > Zope folder http://internal:8080/internal. Hope that makes sense. Could > someone help me out with the syntax? Tried the syntax below but not getting > desired results. Thanks! > > > ServerName internal > RewriteEngine On > RewriteRule ^/(.*) > http://internal:8080/VirtualHostBase/http/internal:80/internal/VirtualHostRoot/$1 > [L,P] > > > > > > > > ___ > Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org > http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope > ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** > (Related lists - > http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce > http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ) > > go to plone.org there are step by step examples. you find them under dokumentation robert ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
Re: [Zope] Mod_Rewrite port 8080
On Apr 6, 2009, at 10:01 AM, Bobby wrote: > > Hi, > > I want to use mod_rewrite on Apache to redirect http://internal:80/internal > to http://internal:8080/internal so that when the user request > http://internal:80/internal > , the Zope folder foo will be served up. I still want http://internal:80/ > to stay intact so that the contents from port 80 will still be > served; just the http://internal:80/internal to point to the Zope > folder http://internal:8080/internal. Hope that makes sense. Could > someone help me out with the syntax? Tried the syntax below but not > getting desired results. Thanks! > > > ServerName internal > RewriteEngine On > RewriteRule ^/(.*) > http://internal:8080/VirtualHostBase/http/internal:80/internal/VirtualHostRoot/$1 > > [L,P] > http://www.google.com/search?q="Virtual+Host+Monster"+"Inside+Out"; > RewriteRule ^internal/(.*) > http://internal:8080/VirtualHostBase/http/internal:80/internal/VirtualHostRoot/_vh_internal/$1 > > [P] Ric ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
[Zope] Mod_Rewrite port 8080
Hi, I want to use mod_rewrite on Apache to redirect http://internal:80/internal to http://internal:8080/internal so that when the user request http://internal:80/internal, the Zope folder foo will be served up. I still want http://internal:80/ to stay intact so that the contents from port 80 will still be served; just the http://internal:80/internal to point to the Zope folder http://internal:8080/internal. Hope that makes sense. Could someone help me out with the syntax? Tried the syntax below but not getting desired results. Thanks! ServerName internal RewriteEngine On RewriteRule ^/(.*) http://internal:8080/VirtualHostBase/http/internal:80/internal/VirtualHostRoot/$1 [L,P] ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
Re: [Zope] [Zope-dev] Zope 4.0, maybe not such a bad idea...
Lennart Regebro wrote: > On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 10:34, Chris Withers wrote: >> Lennart Regebro wrote: >>> Grok and Repoze is not mutually exclusive. >> For end users who pick one or the other, they are *are* mutually exclusive >> in that the users won't necessarily know (or care) that the other exists... > > I think you confuse Repoze and repoze.bfg. ...exactly as any newbie would ;-) (and I *am* a newbie with Repoze as a whole...) > Grok can, and IMO should, > run on top of Repoze. Again, from a newbie perspective I see "Grok", at that level, I don't care what it's built on. Chris -- Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting - http://www.simplistix.co.uk ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
Re: [Zope] [Zope-dev] Zope 4.0, maybe not such a bad idea...
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 10:34, Chris Withers wrote: > Lennart Regebro wrote: >> Grok and Repoze is not mutually exclusive. > > For end users who pick one or the other, they are *are* mutually exclusive > in that the users won't necessarily know (or care) that the other exists... I think you confuse Repoze and repoze.bfg. Grok can, and IMO should, run on top of Repoze. -- Lennart Regebro: Pythonista, Barista, Notsotrista. http://regebro.wordpress.com/ +33 661 58 14 64 ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
Re: [Zope] [Zope-dev] Zope 4.0, maybe not such a bad idea...
Lennart Regebro wrote: >>> 3. Grok moves over either to Zope.pipeline or repose.bfg as publisher in >>> Grok 2. >> Grok is Grok, Repoze is Repoze, lets leave them be and let them choose their >> own names... > > Grok and Repoze is not mutually exclusive. For end users who pick one or the other, they are *are* mutually exclusive in that the users won't necessarily know (or care) that the other exists... >> Bream 4 on top of Framework 4 >> Standard 4(which would include Framework 4) >> Plone 4 on top of Standard 4 >> Repoze and Grok on top of Framework 4 > > Yup. Sounds good to me. > > As usual, I don't think any decisions should be taken. This is just > what I would like to see. People either do it or do not. This last paragraph is a bit meaningless. Lack of action is what's got us here in the first place. I'd like to see some consensus and then action be taken... Chris -- Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting - http://www.simplistix.co.uk ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
Re: [Zope] [Zope-dev] new www.zope.org, new dev.zope.org, old www.zope.org
Michael Haubenwallner wrote: > There really should be not problem to integrate current > www.zope.org/Products and www.zope.org/Members including the LDAP > authentication service into an new www.zope.org. I really don't think we need to implement this if Andreas' redirect plan works out. You're more than welcome to maintain old.zope.org ;-) > No need to break any > links - we already did similar with moving DevHome wikis out to > wiki.zope.org. Well yeah, but that hasn't made the information there any more maintained. Just last week I had to go through and remove a couple of references to account.php. I know the plan here is to replace that with the contents of http://docs.zope.org/developer/, and have dev.zope.org go to the same place. The sooner that happens the better... cheers, Chris -- Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting - http://www.simplistix.co.uk ___ Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )