On Tue, 2006-07-03 at 09:35 +, Chris Withers wrote:
*sigh* red tape wins again. It's much easier to just do nothing, and
just not be able to contribute from behind a firewall...
Yeah, this is always unfortunate.
The issues aren't so much technical feasibility as social / legal: a
yuppie wrote at 2006-3-10 20:20 +0100:
...
To support WebDAV as widely as possible, I would prefer to
get rid of all id restrictions. I do not like to see
new restrictions emerging...
You just don't like it or do you know a better alternative?
We need a way to make sure that object IDs can't
Those are the type of people that ideas but need us to implement them to
make them real. Those ideas and having them implemented means more work
for us in the community and that means more bright people in the community.
Just my experience.
Like the idea of balance also. What I was thinking
I am looking to map a portion of the local file system into Zope. One way
to do this is to use LocalFS, another is to use Ape. I am sure there are
onter approaches as well. We are using Zop 2.9.X. Will Ape work in this
context? What would you suggest?
On 11 Mar 2006, at 03:13, Dennis Allison wrote:
I am looking to map a portion of the local file system into Zope.
One way
to do this is to use LocalFS, another is to use Ape. I am sure
there are
onter approaches as well. We are using Zop 2.9.X. Will Ape work
in this
context? What
Dennis Allison wrote:
I am looking to map a portion of the local file system into Zope. One way
to do this is to use LocalFS, another is to use Ape. I am sure there are
onter approaches as well. We are using Zop 2.9.X. Will Ape work in this
context? What would you suggest?
Ape doesn't
Dan Gaibel wrote:
Hello Folks,
I'm interested in finding a company that will do monthly managed zope
hosting. We're looking for a dedicated machine. I know that Zope Corp does
this and it is quite expensive. I wonder if anyone has had any experiences
with such a service.
Any advice is highly
J Cameron Cooper wrote:
Dan Gaibel wrote:
Hello Folks,
I'm interested in finding a company that will do monthly managed zope
hosting. We're looking for a dedicated machine. I know that Zope Corp
does
this and it is quite expensive. I wonder if anyone has had any
experiences
with such a
Am I correct that zope's item.subitem:record facility for form
submission does not extend to nesting such things? If I have a form
of the sort:
input name=item.subitem.subsubitem:record
I would like it to show up in the request as a record 'item' with an
element named 'subitem' that is itself a
Have a look at:
http://www.zope.org/Members/Zen/howto/FormVariableTypes
Jonathan
- Original Message -
From: Michael Shulman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: zope@zope.org
Sent: Saturday, March 11, 2006 6:27 PM
Subject: [Zope] nested records
Am I correct that zope's item.subitem:record
I don't *think* that page answers my question... if it does, can you
point me to where?
On 3/11/06, Jonathan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have a look at:
http://www.zope.org/Members/Zen/howto/FormVariableTypes
Jonathan
- Original Message -
From: Michael Shulman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
+1 for Zettai. Have had great success with them.
If you need a place to stick a server then I highly recommend bayMountain. Amazing service and support. A great team of open source and Zope experts there.
Allen
David wrote:
J Cameron Cooper wrote:
Dan Gaibel wrote:
Hello Folks,
I'm
--On 11. März 2006 18:26:52 -0600 Michael Shulman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I don't *think* that page answers my question... if it does, can you
point me to where?
record
Nested records are not supported and this is a very uncommon usecase.
You should fix your data model _somehow_.
-aj
13 matches
Mail list logo
