Hi,
Sidnei has been working on the Zope 2 publication-refactor branch
where he's allowed the use of the Zope 3 Twisted-based server, and of
a Zope 3 based publication process.
I'd like to see this merge branched in Zope 2 trunk because I'd like
Zope 2.10 to be Twisted-based. What's
--On 13. April 2006 11:46:20 +0200 Florent Guillaume [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Sidnei has been working on the Zope 2 publication-refactor branch where
he's allowed the use of the Zope 3 Twisted-based server, and of a Zope 3
based publication process.
I'd like to see this merge branched
On 13.04.2006, at 11:55, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 13. April 2006 11:46:20 +0200 Florent Guillaume [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
Sidnei has been working on the Zope 2 publication-refactor branch
where
he's allowed the use of the Zope 3 Twisted-based server, and of a
Zope 3
based
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 11:46:20AM +0200, Florent Guillaume wrote:
| Hi,
|
| Sidnei has been working on the Zope 2 publication-refactor branch
| where he's allowed the use of the Zope 3 Twisted-based server, and of
| a Zope 3 based publication process.
|
| I'd like to see this merge branched
Sidnei da Silva wrote:
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 11:46:20AM +0200, Florent Guillaume wrote:
| Hi,
|
| Sidnei has been working on the Zope 2 publication-refactor branch
| where he's allowed the use of the Zope 3 Twisted-based server, and of
| a Zope 3 based publication process.
|
| I'd
--On 13. April 2006 15:39:06 +0200 Philipp von Weitershausen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is the small solution in which we provide a WSGI-capable frontend
to the ZPublisher. The big solution would be to replace ZPublisher
with zope.publisher and a custom Zope2-oriented publication +
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
I think the big solution would take a considerable effort. It's less
than three weeks before feature freeze. That is very little time even
for the small solution.
Actually, I *think* I was wrong. The feature freeze will be June 1st,
not May 1st. Perhaps the
From: Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Philipp von Weitershausen [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Sidnei da Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED], Andreas Jung
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Florent Guillaume [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: List Zope-dev zope-dev@zope.org
Subject: Re: z3 server+publication refactor for z2
Date-Sent: 13.
--On 13. April 2006 15:58:44 +0200 Philipp von Weitershausen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the big solution would take a considerable effort. It's less
than three weeks before feature freeze. That is very little time even
for the small solution.
Big or small? Would this be an optional
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Florent Guillaume wrote:
Hi,
Sidnei has been working on the Zope 2 publication-refactor branch where
he's allowed the use of the Zope 3 Twisted-based server, and of a Zope
3 based publication process.
I'd like to see this merge branched in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bernd Dorn wrote:
On 13.04.2006, at 11:55, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 13. April 2006 11:46:20 +0200 Florent Guillaume [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
Sidnei has been working on the Zope 2 publication-refactor branch
where
he's allowed the
--On 13. April 2006 11:38:38 -0400 Tres Seaver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Florent Guillaume wrote:
Hi,
Sidnei has been working on the Zope 2 publication-refactor branch where
he's allowed the use of the Zope 3 Twisted-based server, and of a
I have a need for 64-bit BTrees (at least for IOBTree and OIBTree),
and I'm not the first. I've created a feature development branch for
this, and checked in my initial implementation.
I've modified the existing code to use PY_LONG_LONG instead of int for
the key and/or value type; there's no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Fred Drake wrote:
I have a need for 64-bit BTrees (at least for IOBTree and OIBTree),
and I'm not the first. I've created a feature development branch for
this, and checked in my initial implementation.
I've modified the existing code to use
Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Fred Drake wrote:
I have a need for 64-bit BTrees (at least for IOBTree and OIBTree),
and I'm not the first. I've created a feature development branch for
this, and checked in my initial implementation.
I've modified the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Fred Drake wrote:
I have a need for 64-bit BTrees (at least for IOBTree and OIBTree),
and I'm not the first. I've created a feature development branch for
[Tres Seaver]
...
I would guess that if you could do a census of all the OIDs in all the
Datas.fs in the world, a significant majority of them would be instances
of classes declared in IOBTree / IIBTree (certainly the bulk of
*transaction* records are going to be tied up with them).
Provided
--On 13. April 2006 02:46:44 -0700 shivayogi kumbar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I am trying to import file from zope2.9 that has been exported in xml
format from the same.I am getting error as follows.
Site Error
An error was encountered while publishing this resource.
Error Type:
JulianRead wrote:
Hi i have created a plone site and now i want to create a user using zope and
give them ownership rights to plone.
Sounds like a Plohn problem. Go ask on their lists.
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
Robert (Jamie) Munro wrote:
gzip will add enormous processing overhead to the server. Striping
spaces will add negligible overhead, likely less overhead than it saves.
I hope you've got a full set of tests that prove these sweeping
statements you're making ;-)
I have written TAL that
--On 13. April 2006 11:49:38 +0200 Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--On 13. April 2006 02:46:44 -0700 shivayogi kumbar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to import file from zope2.9 that has been exported in xml
format from the same.I am getting error as follows.
Site Error
An
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 01:56:58PM -0500, Floyd May wrote:
One solution I've found is to buffer the writes to REQUEST.RESPONSE by
using a python script which the calls granular page templates rather
than a single monolithic template, and outputting the results 25k at a
time or so; it gives
Paul Winkler wrote:
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 01:56:58PM -0500, Floyd May wrote:
One solution I've found is to buffer the writes to REQUEST.RESPONSE by
using a python script which the calls granular page templates rather
than a single monolithic template, and outputting the results 25k at a
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 09:04:38AM -0500, Floyd May wrote:
Paul Winkler wrote:
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 01:56:58PM -0500, Floyd May wrote:
One solution I've found is to buffer the writes to REQUEST.RESPONSE by
using a python script which the calls granular page templates rather
than a single
One more correction for the archives:
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 11:45:41AM -0400, Paul Winkler wrote:
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 09:04:38AM -0500, Floyd May wrote:
Paul Winkler wrote:
Note that this doesn't buy you any improved responsiveness
if you're running behind e.g. apache, because apache
Whenever I'm using SQL databases in zope, I always seem to have to make
a ZSQL instance for inserting into every table in my database, and they
are all nearly the same - they just have a list of all the fields in the
database in the parameters, then they say:
insert into [table] ([list of
On 4/12/06, JulianRead [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi i have created a plone site and now i want to create a user using zope and
give them ownership rights to plone.
At the moment i have created a user using the acl users button on the left
menu bar
and given them ownership rights
Which
Great idea. Not to be recommended in general.
This works because every field is textual, and you are
sql-quoting by using type=string.
Here are the problems:
1) if someone reads this and does not use the type=string
tag, or equivalent, they will be wide open to sql injection.
2) OR, they can
Stefan,
Thanks very very much for your help. I just installed ExtFile 1.5 updated
with some extra properties I had added to my ExtFile 1.4.4. It works nicely.
All of my ExtFile objects are getting catalogged along with some custom
content types I created. I just added a txng_get method to those.
manuel spuhler wrote at 2006-4-12 21:40 +0200:
...
File /opt/Zope2.8/lib/python/ZODB/__init__.py, line 21, in ?
from persistent import TimeStamp
File /opt/Zope2.8/lib/python/persistent/__init__.py, line 19, in ?
from cPersistence import Persistent, GHOST, UPTODATE, CHANGED, STICKY
Paul Winkler wrote at 2006-4-12 12:32 -0400:
...
Functionally, we are missing some important testables:
...
* we have no way to verify that these queries behave as expected against
a sample data set.
If you want to test this, then do it. It will also cover all
other test requirements (e.g.
Sells, Fred wrote at 2006-4-12 16:32 -0400:
...
So after all that rambling, Is Zope a viable tool or am I killing a gnat
with a cannon?
After your somewhat vague description, I would say that your task
is not a standard Zope use case.
Zope is Web application server. Your task does not seem to
Dieter Maurer wrote:
manuel spuhler wrote at 2006-4-12 21:40 +0200:
...
File "/opt/Zope2.8/lib/python/ZODB/__init__.py", line 21, in ?
from persistent import TimeStamp
File "/opt/Zope2.8/lib/python/persistent/__init__.py", line 19, in ?
from cPersistence import Persistent,
33 matches
Mail list logo
