Martijn Faassen wrote:
Chris Withers wrote:
[snip]
One of my other bugbears is that a flood of deprecation warnings often
masks real problems.
What real problems?
Deprecation warnings in code I need to care about, as opposed to
mindless spew from the zope core or other installed products
As always, Martijn has prettymuch hit the nail on the head with this
mail, +lots to all the points he raises...
Chris
Martijn Faassen wrote:
I think we've concluded a number of things:
* some developers (Andreas in particular) do not consider it a huge
problem to keep maintaining an older
Andreas Jung wrote:
I for one, is NOT interested in backporting fixed in Five trunk to
both Five 1.0, 1.1, 1.3, 1.4 and 1.5, which is what are the current
versions of Five if we say that Zope 2.8 and 2.7 should be still
supported after the release of 2.10.
We don't talk about Zope 2.7 which
Benji York wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Uh, never mind.
+1 :)
Any chance you could explain why you feel that way?
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
___
Chris Withers wrote:
Benji York wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Uh, never mind.
+1 :)
Any chance you could explain why you feel that way?
Follow this thread:
http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope3-dev/2005-November/016561.html
Philipp
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Florent Guillaume wrote:
Florent Guillaume wrote:
So here's a proposal: how about having the following order:
- __bobo_traverse__
- unacquired attribute
- zope 3 views
- acquired attributes
Attached is the current diff I'm working with (for Zope 2.10).
Hey,
On 20 Jun 2006, at 13:23, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Florent Guillaume wrote:
Florent Guillaume wrote:
So here's a proposal: how about having the following order:
- __bobo_traverse__
- unacquired attribute
- zope 3 views
- acquired attributes
Attached is the
Florent Guillaume wrote:
On 20 Jun 2006, at 13:23, Martijn Faassen wrote:
[snip]
We've actually noticed Five 1.2.4 is not compatible with Five 1.2 in
some way to do with mysterious 'index.html' bits appearing after URLs
where we thought they shouldn't. We haven't tracked this down and we
On 6/20/06, Florent Guillaume [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was looking at the publisher, and it hacks the URL to explicitely
add the default view to it when a default view is used. That might
explain it. You're saying Zope 2.10 doesn't do that? I thought it did
too.
Well, it adds index_html, not
On 6/20/06, Martijn Faassen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It broke a lot of stuff for us, so we switched back until we can figure
out what's going on when we upgrade that piece of code to a newer
version of Zope.
There is more tests in Five 1.5, adding them to older version of Five
should be easy.
On 6/20/06, Chris Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it's also safe to say that some people will stick with a good
vintage zope which has all the features they need and was stable.
And that's OK, and in many cases completely sensible.
--
Lennart Regebro, Nuxeo http://www.nuxeo.com/
Chris Withers wrote:
Both core zope and Plone spew forth in their default state.
Zope 2.10 does? It shouldn't. Please point out the deprecation warnings
it sends.
Also could we please bury the zLOG-was-only-halfwy-deprecated issue
that's been beaten to death? Everybody knows there were
Chris Withers wrote:
Both core zope and Plone spew forth in their default state.
the deprecation warnings in Plone annoy me to no end. unfortunately, though,
Plone (thus far) has chosen to straddle Zope release. i can't fix the
deprecation warnings that Plone 2.5 generates with Zope 2.9,
Reinoud van Leeuwen wrote:
We now would like to rollout ftp acces for the users that cannot use
webdav for some reason.
I'm not sure I'd recommend Zope's FTP server, it's kinda crufty.
Rather roll out WebDAV, which can be load balanced in the same way as
any other web request.
cheers,
Hi All,
Is there any performance hit for having DeadlockDebugger installed and
enabled all the time on a production zope instance?
cheers,
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
Hi All,
How can I do this with dtml?
select name=MODLEVEL size=1
dtml-if expr=dtml-var name=MODLEVEL == 1 #I need an
alternative to this.
option value=1 selected=selected1/option
option value=22/option
Etc, etc.
Hope someone can help.
Jon
Jonathan Bowlas schrieb:
Hi All,
How can I do this with dtml?
select name=MODLEVEL size=1
dtml-if expr=dtml-var name=MODLEVEL == 1 #I need an
alternative to this.
option value=1 selected=selected1/option
option value=22/option
Etc, etc.
--On 20. Juni 2006 12:15:40 +0100 Jonathan Bowlas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
How can I do this with dtml?
select name=MODLEVEL size=1
dtml-if expr=dtml-var name=MODLEVEL == 1 #I need an
alternative to this.
option value=1 selected=selected1/option
Hi, no need for nested dtml :
select name=MODLEVEL size=1
option value=1dtml-if expr=MODLEVEL == '1' selected/dtml-if1/option
option value=2dtml-if expr=MODLEVEL == '2' selected/dtml-if2/option
/select
On 6/20/06, Jonathan Bowlas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
How can I do this with dtml?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonathan Bowlas
How can I do this with dtml?
select name=MODLEVEL size=1
dtml-if expr=dtml-var name=MODLEVEL == 1 #I need an
alternative to this.
option value=1 selected=selected1/option
option value=22/option
Hmm, this doesn't appear to work.
Let me explain what I'm trying to do.
I have a Z SQL Method called selectmoduleinfoMethod that contains the SQL:
SELECT * FROM RECMGR_EL_MODULE_Query WHERE MODCODE = dtml-sqlvar
MODCODE type=string
This recordset is returned to a dtml form to populate
I have an external method that is trying to create
a Transient Object Container in a 'temp_folder', as follows:
def BuildGarbageCollector(self):
folder =
self.restrictedTraverse('Coz/TempImages')
# Coz/TempImages already exists
folder.constructTransientObjectContainer(self,
Chris Withers wrote:
Is there any performance hit for having DeadlockDebugger installed and
enabled all the time on a production zope instance?
The only performance hit is an added
if uri == dump_url:
per request, which is totally negligible.
DeadlockDebugger has been designed to stay
This is untested, but it's a pretty familiar idiom to me at the moment.
dtml-in selectmoduleinfoMethod prefix=dbmodlevel
dtml-call REQUEST.set('dbmodlevel', dbmodlevel_item)
/dtml-in
select name=MODLEVEL
dtml-in range(1, 8) prefix=modlevel
optiondtml-if expr=modlevel_item == dbmodlevel
Jonathan Bowlas schrieb:
Hmm, this doesn't appear to work.
Let me explain what I'm trying to do.
I have a Z SQL Method called selectmoduleinfoMethod that contains the SQL:
SELECT * FROM RECMGR_EL_MODULE_Query WHERE MODCODE = dtml-sqlvar
MODCODE type=string
You should never use
Thanks for everyone's help. I may be able to sort this now.
-Original Message-
From: Tino Wildenhain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20 June 2006 15:09
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 'Jaroslav Lukesh'; zope@zope.org
Subject: Re: [Zope] Nested dtml tags
Jonathan Bowlas schrieb:
Hmm, this
- Original Message -
From: Chris McDonough [EMAIL PROTECTED]
folder.manage_addProducts ['Transience'].constructTransientObjectContainer
might work (assuming constructTransientObjectContainer is the right
constructor name, I didn't check).
Chris, thanks for the idea - I tried it,
I am dealing with a zope system where Verisign is sending a POST to our server
for ecommerece purposes. Currently I am writing the entire contents of the
POST from verisign to the ZODB however I have a problem that some of these
POSTs are not being recorded because an error occurs later in the
import transaction
transaction.abort()
should do it. I will spare you the nannylike warnings about managing
your own transaction state..
- C
On Jun 20, 2006, at 11:21 AM, Luiz Fernando B. Ribeiro wrote:
I need to return an error page with instructions after verifying a
request but I
On Jun 20, 2006, at 2:27 PM, William Heymann wrote:
I am dealing with a zope system where Verisign is sending a POST to
our server
for ecommerece purposes. Currently I am writing the entire contents
of the
POST from verisign to the ZODB however I have a problem that some
of these
POSTs
- Original Message -
From: William Heymann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: zope@zope.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 2:27 PM
Subject: [Zope] How to commit a piece of data in a transaction when
thetransaction is being aborted later
I am dealing with a zope system where Verisign is sending a
On Tuesday 20 June 2006 12:47, Chris McDonough wrote:
I'd just record the data from Verisign in response to their POST (do
nothing else) and come along later with a separate request to pick
through the data to do postprocessing on it every so often; then the
data always gets recorded and you
On Jun 20, 2006, at 2:55 PM, William Heymann wrote:
That is probably a good idea for long term to change things that
way and I
would like to rewrite it. However right now I don't really want to
rewrite
the way the current system works. I had hoped I could just use
get_transaction().commit()
33 matches
Mail list logo