Log message for revision 92289:
updated to ZODB 3.8.1
Changed:
U Zope/branches/2.11/doc/CHANGES.txt
-=-
Modified: Zope/branches/2.11/doc/CHANGES.txt
===
--- Zope/branches/2.11/doc/CHANGES.txt 2008-10-17 06:24:48 UTC (rev
Log message for revision 92290:
updated to ZODB 3.8.1
Changed:
_U Zope/branches/2.11/lib/python/
-=-
Property changes on: Zope/branches/2.11/lib/python
___
Name: svn:externals
- BTrees
Log message for revision 92299:
use the _current_ ZODB 3.8.1 release
Changed:
_U Zope/branches/2.11/utilities/
-=-
Property changes on: Zope/branches/2.11/utilities
___
Name: svn:externals
- ZODBTools
Log message for revision 92300:
using _current_ ZODB 3.7.1 release
Changed:
_U Zope/branches/2.10/utilities/
-=-
Property changes on: Zope/branches/2.10/utilities
___
Name: svn:externals
- ZODBTools -r 41153
El 17 Oct 2008, a las 10:37 , Christian Theune escribió:
There is a process that actually needs the request and this process
is
what I call traversal: breaking down a URL and finding a publishable
object. zope.traversing has (almost) nothing to do with it, the real
kind of traversal happens
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Thu Oct 16 11:00:00 2008 UTC to Fri Oct 17 11:00:00 2008 UTC.
There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.6 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Thu Oct 16 20:50:58 EDT 2008
URL:
On Oct 15, 2008, at 12:02 PM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Christian Theune wrote:
we stumbled over an annoyance that took a while to debug:
Writing an ITraversable, we used zope.traversing.api.traverse() in a
test to verify our code. We registered the ITraversable as an
(non-multi)
El 17 Oct 2008, a las 15:02 , Jim Fulton escribió:
First of all, its name is quite misleading. It should really be
called
'zope.resolvepath' because it resolves TALES-like object paths. In
fact,
it's pretty much only used by the PageTemplate machinery to hook it
up
to the TALES
On 2008-10-15 17:49:30 +0200, Christian Theune [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Why is a ForbiddenAttribute also an AttributeError? Is this intended to
avoid 'information leaks'?
We found a nasty side-effect together with getattr and annotations: a
user that didn't have read-access to
Hi,
a few weeks ago I posted a bug regarding zope.testbrowser:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope3/+bug/268139
»When there is XML or HTML-Code in the Textarea the newlines are removed.«
Could anybody give me a hint how to fix it? I'd really apprechiate it
because it prevents me from using Python
Hi,
I currently have two schema.Choice() fields in my z3c.form - based form, that
references the same vocabulary.
runjobs = Choice(
title = u'Job',
vocabulary=('cronjobsVocabulary'),
required = False)
cronjobs = Choice(
title = u'Periodic Jobs',
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
Log message for revision 92293:
Changed the generated test script to use a part-local tmp directory
that is cleaned up at the start of a test run.
Unfortunately, the ZODB tests leave lots of temporary files behind
On Oct 17, 2008, at 12:38 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
Log message for revision 92293:
Changed the generated test script to use a part-local tmp directory
that is cleaned up at the start of a test run.
Unfortunately, the ZODB
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Log message for revision 92303:
zope.testing somehow doesn't upgrade without hardcoding it. I don't know
why I keep running into it, but I am running into it absolutely all over
the place.
There is a newer release of
On Friday 17 October 2008, Jim Fulton wrote:
It would be nice to deprecate zope.traversing and fold it into
zope.app.pagetemplate.
Just skimming the thread, wouldn't this make it harder for us to integrate
z3c.pt, which also needs those traversal APIs?
Regards,
Stephan
--
Stephan Richter
On Oct 17, 2008, at 1:13 PM, Stephan Richter wrote:
On Friday 17 October 2008, Jim Fulton wrote:
It would be nice to deprecate zope.traversing and fold it into
zope.app.pagetemplate.
Just skimming the thread, wouldn't this make it harder for us to
integrate
z3c.pt, which also needs
Christian Theune wrote at 2008-10-16 20:27 +0200:
...
Then again, verifyObject is a *very* light way to spot simple errors.
IMHO attributes and methods aren't that different in Python, as using
both may result in exceptions.
Using attributes (not computed one) does not result in exceptions.
Dieter Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
And if the attribute is implemented by a property (of the class, i.e.
the decriptor is on the metaclass), then the descriptors __get__
is called (in the same way as for verifyObject).
Instance properties (descriptor on the class) may not define methods
Thomas Lotze wrote at 2008-10-16 20:57 +0200:
Christian Theune [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Arguably, the check for an attribute would be sufficient if it checked
whether an attribute implementation is around -- either by a simple
attribute value or a descriptor providing that.
At this point, I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dieter Maurer wrote:
Thomas Lotze wrote at 2008-10-16 20:57 +0200:
Christian Theune [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Arguably, the check for an attribute would be sufficient if it checked
whether an attribute implementation is around -- either by a
Thomas Lotze wrote at 2008-10-17 19:42 +0200:
Dieter Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
...
Instance properties (descriptor on the class) may not define methods
(probably a bug).
I don't understand what you're saying in that last sentence; can you
elaborate?
verifyObject/verifyClass is likely
testrunner-coverage.txt is failing since this check in. What's up
with this?
Jim
On Aug 27, 2008, at 3:41 AM, Stephan Richter wrote:
Log message for revision 90401:
- Open doctest files in universal mode, so that packages released
in Windoes
can be tested in Linux, for example.
Dieter Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
verifyObject/verifyClass is likely not to handle the following
case correctly:
class I(Interface):
def m(...):
...
class C(object):
implements(I)
m = property(lambda self: lambda ...: ...)
i.e. when
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dieter Maurer wrote:
Thomas Lotze wrote at 2008-10-17 19:42 +0200:
Dieter Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
...
Instance properties (descriptor on the class) may not define methods
(probably a bug).
I don't understand what you're saying in that
On Friday 17 October 2008, Jim Fulton wrote:
testrunner-coverage.txt is failing since this check in. What's up
with this?
It passes for me on Python 2.5. Can you be more specific? Are you using a
ZC-internal set of package versions? :-)
Regards,
Stephan
--
Stephan Richter
Web Software
On Oct 17, 2008, at 3:16 PM, Stephan Richter wrote:
On Friday 17 October 2008, Jim Fulton wrote:
testrunner-coverage.txt is failing since this check in. What's up
with this?
It passes for me on Python 2.5.
Sigh. It passes for me too with 2.5.
Can you be more specific?
It fails with
Tres Seaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Dieter Maurer wrote:
class C(object):
implements(I)
m = property(lambda self: lambda ...: ...)
i.e. when a method (declared by the interface) is implemented by a property.
Why would I want to do that, rather than using
Hi,
During testing, I found the following warnings/errors in my zope log:
---
2008-10-17T17:56:50 WARNING ZopePublication Competing writes/reads at ???:
database conflict error (oid 0x06d3, class zc.queue._queue.BucketQueue,
serial this txn started with 0x0379451cbf5d7bdd 2008-10-17
Am Freitag 17 Oktober 2008 18:06:34 schrieb Hermann Himmelbauer:
Hi,
I currently have two schema.Choice() fields in my z3c.form - based form,
that references the same vocabulary.
Aeh, sorry, forget about it - I had a mistake in my page template, which
referenced the same widget for two times,
Previously Jim Fulton wrote:
On Oct 17, 2008, at 1:13 PM, Stephan Richter wrote:
On Friday 17 October 2008, Jim Fulton wrote:
It would be nice to deprecate zope.traversing and fold it into
zope.app.pagetemplate.
Just skimming the thread, wouldn't this make it harder for us to
To whom it may concern,
Thanks so much for your good work and for adding the new feature
(MailHost with asynchronous mode).
I have just installed the new version of Zope (2.11.1) on my Mac to
be able to use it.
I did struggle a bit, though, because I didn't realize that in the
method for
Hi Mark Gibson,
Do you develop this with egg ? throw Products namespace ?
The zcml seems good. If you develop outside of the Products namespace don't
forget to include your package in the site.zcml. You can verify this by making
a mistake in the zcml and try to start zope.
Does you content
Thx Marco
I don't know what was the pb, but after having this issue, my instance was not
able to start. So i have re-buildout it and now, all is OK. Stepper work with
those Products/__init__.py files.
In fact i m adding __init__ file to every Products folder because Pydev index
source in it
Hi JeanMichel, thanks for our reply.
This is not an egg - just a simple product I have in
instance_home/lib/python. I'm working with Zope 2.9.7, not a buildout
environment. I get the Boring product in the Add dropdown, and I can
create the object. I do have the product included in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dennis Allison wrote:
Is the appropriate Python still 2.4.5 and not either 2.5.X or 2.6.X?
We are discussion 2.5 / 2.6 as supported for the not-yet-released 2.12;
nothing has changed (or will) for the already-released 2.11.
Tres.
- --
I migrated a server from one machine to another (using this thread:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=35087) and while most everything
transferred over correctly (some permission settings didnt) apache isnt %100
working.
There are two virtual host files, the default, and the
here is an error I found in my apache error log, its repeated over and over:
127.0.0.1 - - [07/Oct/2008:05:27:41 -0500] GET / HTTP/1.0 503 323 -
Apache/2.2.3 (Ubuntu) PHP/5.2.1 mod_ssl/2.2.3 OpenSSL/0.9.8c (internal
dummy connection)
rugbert wrote:
I migrated a server from one machine to
+---[ Garry Saddington ]--
| How would I do this:
|
| dtml_method = context.singleitemview.html
| s =
| return s
dtml_method = getattr(context, 'singleitemview.html')
return dtml_method(client=context, REQUEST={}, foo='bar')
--
Andrew Milton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Friday 17 October 2008 21:30, Andrew Milton wrote:
+---[ Garry Saddington ]--
| How would I do this:
|
| dtml_method = context.singleitemview.html
| s =
| return s
dtml_method = getattr(context, 'singleitemview.html')
return dtml_method(client=context,
39 matches
Mail list logo
