Log message for revision 93423:
Revert to the standard Zope 3 provider-expression; this is reasonable and
required after the sane acquisition branch has been merged.
Changed:
U Zope/trunk/doc/CHANGES.txt
D Zope/trunk/lib/python/Products/Five/browser/providerexpression.py
U
Tres Seaver wrote:
Hmm, some exceptions should never be caught (KeyboardInterrupt,
SystemExit, ConflictError).
indeed, changing to:
except Exception:
...will do the right thing for Python = 2.5
cheers,
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope Python Consulting
-
Hey,
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 12:12 PM, Chris Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
It's clearly the case that people who are reading this thread know how
to avoid download.zope.org. The people who are not reading this thread
just get tough luck from the Zope community when
Can someone release z3c.indexer 0.5.1, or give me rights to do so
myself? It has some important bugfixes and seems to be stable. Or is
there any work on this package planned to do soon? :-)
--
WBR, Dan Korostelev
___
Zope-Dev maillist -
Hi Dan
Betreff: [Zope-dev] z3c.indexer 0.5.1
Can someone release z3c.indexer 0.5.1, or give me rights to
do so myself? It has some important bugfixes and seems to be
stable. Or is there any work on this package planned to do soon? :-)
Thanks a lot, any improvment is welcome.
I have some
Martijn Faassen wrote:
It's clearly the case that people who are reading this thread know how
to avoid download.zope.org. The people who are not reading this thread
just get tough luck from the Zope community when their software
doesn't work anymore.
No, that's not quite what I said. I'm
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Thu Nov 27 12:00:00 2008 UTC to Fri Nov 28 12:00:00 2008 UTC.
There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Tests.
Test failures
-
Subject: FAILED (failures=3) : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.5 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Thu Nov 27 20:39:40 EST
Andreas Jung wrote:
huh? You have to walk through the whole folder hierarchy?1
So? With a catalog query you'll have return the *whole* catalog contents.
And if you're stupid enough to get getObject involved, then you drag
them all into memory *and* the catalog anyway...
Chris
--
Simplistix
Andreas Jung wrote:
There is a difference pulling 500k brains out-of-the catalog compared to
traversing a ZODB with 500k object. I assume that the catalog solution
is slightly faster :)
Yes, well, you kno what they say about assumptions...
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope
On 28.11.2008 12:56 Uhr, Chris Withers wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
There is a difference pulling 500k brains out-of-the catalog compared
to traversing a ZODB with 500k object. I assume that the catalog
solution is slightly faster :)
Yes, well, you kno what they say about assumptions...
ok,
Andreas Jung wrote:
This is a *VERY EXPENSIVE* operation unless you use something like
Plone or CMF and ask the portal_catalog for all objects.
How is that any less expensive?
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
On 28.11.2008 12:21 Uhr, Chris Withers wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
huh? You have to walk through the whole folder hierarchy?1
So? With a catalog query you'll have return the *whole* catalog contents.
There is a difference pulling 500k brains out-of-the catalog compared to
traversing a ZODB
On 28.11.2008 12:15 Uhr, Chris Withers wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
This is a *VERY EXPENSIVE* operation unless you use something like
Plone or CMF and ask the portal_catalog for all objects.
How is that any less expensive?
huh? You have to walk through the whole folder hierarchy?1
-aj
Does anyone know of an existing tool for restoring all security
settings/rolemaps from the ground up? Obviously I can use rolemap.xml
where applicable and update workflow security. I want to first restore
the Zope root to code defaults and restore the whole hierarchy to just
acquire.
I'm going
14 matches
Mail list logo
