On Mon, 2005-04-11 at 16:35, Fernando Lujan wrote:
Hi everyone,
Is there possible to use a Session control without cookies?
Yes.
I already changed the browser_id_manager and unchecked the cookies and
checked the Automatically Encode Zope-Generated URLs With A Browser Id
option. But
No, sorry. THe canonical version is on the web.
- C
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 04:10, Dario Lopez-Ksten wrote:
Chris McDonough wrote:
I don't think anyone has given much thought to actually documenting all
these nice nifty features in 2.9. Which is no change from the norm
Yes.
All the information in that article is geared for Zope 2.5 which had no
facility for using mounted databases from a config file... everything up
until At this time you should be able to navigate to the
/session_storage folder... in that article can be done by reconfiguring
ZEO using zeo.conf
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 18:23, Fernando Lujan wrote:
Please, take a look in what I've done! Is that right? It works pretty
fine here! :-)
If it works for you, it's right. ;-)
If this is right, are there a desire for a how-to? I think I can write
one, once it's pretty simple as you said.
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 19:08, Richard Jones wrote:
Is there a viable non-versioned alternative to the filestorage approach? My
sessions database grows ridiculously quickly. I'm also fairly sure it's
causing problems when my site gets ~5 requests a second (yes, that low)
You could use
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 20:01, Richard Jones wrote:
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 09:44 am, you wrote:
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 19:08, Richard Jones wrote:
Is there a viable non-versioned alternative to the filestorage approach?
My sessions database grows ridiculously quickly. I'm also fairly sure
Many things could be going on here. I don't know of any outstanding
memory leaks in Zope itself. There may be one in Plone or another
3rd-party product you're using. Or you may have created one within your
own code. Tracking down memory leaks is hard and it's not clear to even
tell you where
This is actually normal. See the end of
http://www.plope.com/Books/2_7Edition/Sessions.stx (Conflict Errors)
for a short explanation.
On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 08:00 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm getting a ZODB.POSException.ReadConflictError on my Plone 2.0.5
site (Zope 2.7.3, Python 2.3.4
On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 11:58 -0400, Tim Peters wrote:
[Chris McDonough]
This is actually normal. See the end of
http://www.plope.com/Books/2_7Edition/Sessions.stx (Conflict Errors)
for a short explanation.
Conflict errors are certainly normal, but IIUC the OP is seeing site
errors
On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 09:18 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I cc'ed Tim Peters on this, perhaps to his chagrin, but he seemed to be
interested in this. ;-)
Thank you for that reference (I have an older dead trees version). Now
I understand that these errors happen, but what I don't understand
Web Folders pass cookies around too, FWIW, so it's probably not strictly
necessary to use http basic auth. But without using http basic auth,
there is no way to log in unless you have them go to the web interface
first, then launch a web folder, so maybe impractical.
- C
On Sat, 2005-05-07 at
On Fri, 2005-05-06 at 12:48, J Cameron Cooper wrote:
I agree, it would be nice to have zLOG work on startup, but I don't know
how easy/possible that is.
FWIW, the reason zLOG doesn't start writing to the log at an earlier
time is that it waits until the process can switch effective users. If
/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
--
Chris McDonough [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists
You may want to use a tool like wget or curl to examine the response
from the server for the clicked URL. This could be many things.
- C
On Thu, 2005-05-19 at 18:37 -0300, Fernando Lujan wrote:
I'm having the following problem and wanna know whether it can be
associated with Zope.
I have
On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 12:41 +0200, Garito wrote:
Hi all
I have a ZCatalog object with a keywordindex called keywords
I would like to search some objects with keywords ['k1', 'k2', k3',
'k4'] for that I use:
return context.catalog({'keywords': {'query': ['k1', 'k2', k3', 'k4'],
Use two things: a page template and a Python script... here's an
example:
page template body
--
div tal:define=L python: [1,2,3,4];
A python: context.sum_of(L)
div tal:repeat=V L
tal:content=V1/div
div tal:content=Atotal/div
/div
python script
Does a (Script) Python object actually get created or is it another
object type like DTML Document when it is initially created? As far as
I can tell, it would have to be the latter, as Python Scripts don't
allow you to change their content-types (at least via the ZMI).
On Fri, 2005-05-20 at
You might also be able to do the __bases__ hack with Zope 2.8 (as long
as Python 2.3+ allows you to assign to it), as it reimplements
ExtensionClass using metaclasses instead of custom C hackery.
On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 14:46 -0400, Paul Winkler wrote:
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 01:48:46PM -0400, Dan
The DWIM of not disallowing traversal of underscore names is useful
(because it makes it easy to conventionally mark attrs as private) but
it can definitely be a drag if you really do want to publish something
that begins with an underscore; this happens a lot when you need to deal
with allowing
could either specify the exact items that start with '_',
or have a method determine it on the fly.
This way you would not automatically make all attributes that start with
an underscore
accessible, and the developer could specify exceptions.
-Original Message-
From: Chris
There are no known bugs in Zope itself after Zope 2.7.3 consistent with
what I *think* your observations are. There can be issues caused by not
repersisting mutable data, as Malcom described. But that said, I'm not
sure I understand what you mean when you say:
- I have my zope running with a
I'm pretty sure there's none meant to be. Are you having a problem or
are you just doing due diligence?
On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 13:33 +0300, George Tesseris wrote:
R there any known compatibility issues regarding Zope(2.7.6) on Windows
XP Pro x64?
Thanks,
George
Typically it's because:
- Zope starts faster in a ZEO setup.
- You can use zopectl debug to get into a debugger session
without shutting down Zope first if you use ZEO.
- C
On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 11:03 +0200, gabor wrote:
hi,
i understand that you need to use ZEO when running ZOPE on a
Hi Leticia,
Thanks for the detailed bug report.
I have tried to replicate the bug as you indicate below but cannot.
I've gone through the process you describe ten times without errors (in
Zope 2.7.6).
If it's possible to simplify the steps to recreate the error, that would
be helpful in further
Since Casey Duncan, the original author of Zope External Editor is
happily hacking away on other things at a new job, I figure I might as
well pick up maintenance of this product.
The new location for External Editor releases will be:
http://plope.com/software/ExternalEditor/
A new release
(or whatever it was exactly)
but when I tried doubleclicking it it complained about being corrupt.
Has anybody else had similar problems?
On 6/21/05, Chris McDonough [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since Casey Duncan, the original author of Zope External Editor is
happily hacking away
Where is the ZopeEdit.ini file you're editing? According to the 0.8
code it should pick up the editor defined in the config file up and use
it exclusively in preference to any extension- or content/type- related
executables. The code first looks in:
os.path.expanduser('~\\ZopeEdit.ini')
(which
Yeah, apparently 0.8 (and 0.9) writes some defaults into the homedir
file if it doesn't find it there instead of copying over what exists.
Maybe it should not do this.
On Tue, 2005-06-21 at 13:06 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Chris. The ini that I was editing is located at:
c:\program
The Zope Book says this in its preface FWIW:
To make effective use of the book, you should know how to use a web
browser and you should have a basic understanding of HTML (Hyper Text
Markup Language) and URLs (Uniform Resource Locators). You don't need to
be a highly-skilled programmer in order
On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 21:14 +0200, Josef Meile wrote:
Do you mean this?
http://plope.com/software/ExternalEditor
Are there any screen shots of it in action?
I'm not exactly sure how it works, but have feeling it won't work for me.
Yes, that's what Paul meant. I tried it once and
On Tue, 2005-06-28 at 03:57 -0400, Tres Seaver wrote:
The Windows WebFolder implementation has been non-compliant with the DAV
spec from the beginning, and further broken in various ways in each version.
The usual recommendation is to buy an alternative, e.g. Enfold Systems'
PloneDesktop, or
I've been following this discussion with some interest as I have never
been able to get ExternalEditor to work for me. Now, that said, I have
it confiured enough that it will present me with an editor and a file
(WinWord) by clicking on the pencil. But I am confused on two points:
1.) When
Note that MS has a Webfolders fixer program, see:
http://chapters.marssociety.org/webdav (beginning Some Windows XP
machines have a broken Web Folders installation. Microsoft includes a
Web Folders repair utility built in to Windows to correct the problem.
Use the following steps to fix the
File permissions. The user who is the effective user does not have
permission to overwrite the Data.fs.lock file.
On Mon, 2005-07-04 at 15:29 +, Jeff Kowalczyk wrote:
I am trying to use 'zopectl debug' for the first time with zope-2.8.0,
local ZEO setup. It worked fine with zope-2.7.x and
If you dont think it's file permissions, one thing this could also be...
is your data.fs on an NFS partition? flock doesn't work well on NFS.
On Mon, 2005-07-04 at 21:38 +, Jeff Kowalczyk wrote:
Chris McDonough wrote:
File permissions. The user who is the effective user does not have
I think you're going to need to guess the URL at the moment (shouldn't
be too hard)... the releases are there, they just don't show up in the
old releases list.
On Sat, 2005-07-09 at 15:31 -0700, Dennis Allison wrote:
The download list at zope.org does not have any releases between 2.7.3 and
Yes, it does (heavily).
See http://plone.org/documentation/how-to/setup-from-source
- C
On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 20:57 +0100, michael nt milne wrote:
Hi
This isn't clear to me. I've installed Zope and Python from source but
do I need to also install the Zope CMF for Plone to run properly?
Hi Maciej,
I can't speak to the 500 errors you're receiving but Zope 2.8.0 ships
with a TemporaryStorage implementation (used by sessions in the
default configuration) which does not implement MVCC. The one in 2.8.1
(now in beta) and better will implement MVCC, so you *should* see
performance
On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 23:02 +0200, Maciej Wisniowski wrote:
Previously you've written that:
Zope 2.8.0 ships with a TemporaryStorage
implementation (used by sessions in the default
configuration) which does not implement MVCC.
The one in 2.8.1 (now in beta) and better will
implement
Hmm... not sure what causes this (did you upgrade ZODB versions?) but
you may try:
1. Shut down Zope (or ZEO if you use that).
2. find your Data.fs file
3. Delete the file beside it named Data.fs.index
4. Restart Zope (or ZEO).
See if the error goes away.. FileStorage builds an index of oid
I can't provide any specific advice but you may want to read the
Scaling Zope proposal that this points to:
http://www.plope.com/Members/chrism/scalingzope/view
Note that sessions are a frequent source of conflict errors. If you use
them, you may want to upgrade to Zope 2.8.1, which has MVCC
There is probably a (real) RDB connection per Zope thread times the
number of database connection objects that are in use in your ZODB. Or
something equally baffling. ;-)
- C
On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 16:41 -0400, Asad Habib wrote:
Has anyone had problems with Zope hanging on to database
This typically is indicative of a user pressing their stop button on a
page before it has been fully downloaded. I really should take time out
to figure out how to prevent it from logging this scary message, but in
the meantime it's assumed to be harmless.
- C
On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 17:38
Zope excels at providing web services via XML-RPC. Basically:
- You need to do exactly nothing to make a Zope application
accessible via XML-RPC.
- When Zope isn't responsible for rendering HTML, it can be
quite fast.
- Zope is capable of interfacing transactionally with many
data
On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 16:02 +0100, Pascal Peregrina wrote:
Hi Chris,
Ooops... Reading your reply shows me that I was unclear ;)
Zope will be the CMS system of the architecture (so it will render HTML).
Ah. Well, it's not too bad at doing that either. ;-)
I only meant that it would get
Your tranaaction blocked error messages seem to imply that either or
both of the following is true:
- some transactions are taking a long time
(any more than, say, 200 milliseconds is a long time)
- you have a very high transaction volume.
That said, these messages are informational rather
with a bout 1000 objects being created a
day (Lots of creates)
-Original Message-
From: Chris McDonough [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2005 12:51 PM
To: Kennamore, Matthew G [NTK]
Cc: zope@zope.org
Subject: Re: [Zope] Zope scalabilty and problems
Your
Apparently app is a function in wherever you're doing that, which just
isn't right. If you use zopectl debug, app should be a Zope
Application object. If it isn't... uh... well... something else
besides the POSKeyErrors are wrong. ;-)
On Sat, 2005-09-03 at 16:23 -0400, Jake wrote:
I have been
If you're on Linux/UNIX, try doing this from a command line:
zopectl adduser admin2 admin2
And try to log in as admin2, admin2.
On Sep 5, 2005, at 1:08 AM, Michael Lindner wrote:
Hi, for some reason I can no longer use any scripts to create zope
objects, including the example scripts.
Hi, please try to keep this on the list (if only to give other folks the
benefit of being able to read the conclusion, if there gets to be
one ;-)
I don't know what with a newly installed page nor the old one in
your sentence below means. Can you explain?
On Mon, 2005-09-05 at 16:28 +1000,
This is actually nothing to worry about. The error message doesn't
take into account that the error it's reporting could be a conflict
error (these are normal errors seen during Zope execution). The
catalog probably shouldn't bother logging the error in this case.
On Sep 9, 2005, at 4:16
On Wed, 2005-10-12 at 19:32 +0200, Gaute Amundsen wrote:
I thought the place to start wold be: /temp_folder/session_data/
I have built a small little thing to play with the contents of that.
External method and script below.
However I have not been able to figure out a way to connect
On Oct 12, 2005, at 4:50 PM, Gaute Amundsen wrote:
On Wednesday 12 October 2005 20:19, Chris McDonough wrote:
On Wed, 2005-10-12 at 19:32 +0200, Gaute Amundsen wrote:
I thought the place to start wold be: /temp_folder/session_data/
I have built a small little thing to play
On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 00:26 +0200, Gaute Amundsen wrote:
Well, I know that ther might easily be login less sessions,
but, is it possible to log have session less logins?
Yes. In fact, this is the default for Zope out of the box. Zope's
default user folder uses HTTP basic authentication,
On Fri, 2005-10-14 at 09:27 -0700, Dennis Allison wrote:
Zope 2.7.6
I am a bit confused.
I have a Zope DTML method that is generating ZODB conflict errors.
The DTML method identified as producing the conflicts is a list of calls
to other methods, conditionally executed.
Most
On Sun, 2005-10-16 at 12:29 -0700, Dennis Allison wrote:
What does concern me is the way in which the recommendation to use (at the
moment) Python 2.3.5 is explained.
I may be willing to accept the risks of using a system which has not yet
been audited in terms of security, but I want to
Proably easier and faster to try it than to wait for a response. ;-)
On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 12:46 -0500, Sean Dunn wrote:
I’m running Zope on WindowsXP with plans to run it on server 2003.
Instead of creating user accounts I’d like to leverage NT
authentication.. And NTUserFolder looks like it
Use gnutar to unpack the Zope source tarball.
On Oct 27, 2005, at 4:50 PM, David H wrote:
Thomas Wolf wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to build Zope-2.7.4-0 from source (I can't use a
different version because of the releas of Plone we're
using.) I ran
./configure
Basket is a Zope 2 product which allows you to employ the Python Egg
format to deploy other Zope 2 products. The Python Egg packaging
format is described at http://peak.telecommunity.com/DevCenter/
setuptools . The development of Basket was funded by the Goldegg
initiative described at
On Sun, 2005-11-13 at 01:39 -0800, Dennis Allison wrote:
Zope 2.8.4
ZEO 3.4.2
ZODB 3.4.2
Python 2.4.2 or 2.3.5
MySQL 4.0.20
MySQL-Python 1.2.0
MYSQLDA 2.0.9
We have just moved from Zope 2.7.6 to Zope 2.8.4 motivated, in part, but
the ability to avoid read conflicts under ZODB 3.4.2.
On Nov 14, 2005, at 9:21 PM, Dennis Allison wrote:
ZEO 3.4.2
Zope 2.8.4
ZODB 3.4.2 as relesed with Zope 2.8.4B
Python 2.4.2 or 2.3.5
MySQL 4.0.20
MySQL-Python 1.2.0
MYSQLDA 2.0.9
We have just moved from Zope 2.7.6 to Zope 2.8.4 motivated, in
part, but
the ability to avoid read conflicts
On Nov 15, 2005, at 5:54 PM, Dennis Allison wrote:
Has anyone prepared a set of best practice guidelines on the
techniques to
use to minimize conflicts?
It is becoming clear that we need to do to refactor some of our
code to
get us out of our current conflict pickle.
A quick google
On Nov 16, 2005, at 6:18 PM, Dennis Allison wrote:
Chris,
I am aware that using ZEO to back session database is likely to
increase
the opportunity for conflicts, but using a single session database
seems
to be reaquired if you want, as we do, to distribute out interactive
application
may need to rethink this
simplistic architecture.
On Tue, 15 Nov 2005, Chris McDonough wrote:
On Nov 15, 2005, at 5:54 PM, Dennis Allison wrote:
Has anyone prepared a set of best practice guidelines on the
techniques to
use to minimize conflicts?
It is becoming clear that we need to do
storage in
favor of a local temp storage. That should make things a bit better.
Good idea...
- C
On Wed, 16 Nov 2005, Chris McDonough wrote:
Changing the architecture will likely get you the most bang but note
also that there are a few knobs that you can turn on the transient
object
Hi Pablo,
On Thu, 2005-11-17 at 22:47 -0300, Pablo Ziliani wrote:
Unfortunately, my Zope instance holds multiples virtual sites, so I
can't simply change the root BMI that comes with Zope's installation;
instead I need to create inner BMI instances. So I did, giving the new
instance a
Hi Dennis,
I notice that line 389 of db.py of the most recent ZMySQLDA (2.0.8)
doesn't match the traceback you show. No mutex locking at all is
done in the 2.0.8 version of that module (or any other module in that
product). Are you using an older version?
- C
On Nov 20, 2005, at 9:57
that is.
On Nov 20, 2005, at 1:55 PM, Chris McDonough wrote:
Hi Dennis,
I notice that line 389 of db.py of the most recent ZMySQLDA (2.0.8)
doesn't match the traceback you show. No mutex locking at all is
done in the 2.0.8 version of that module (or any other module in
that product
On Nov 20, 2005, at 12:16 PM, Dennis Allison wrote:
The structure of the naviagation method is simple enough.
Everything is
wrapped in a dtml-let which sets a number of parameters mostly by
reading them from the SESSION (with an interface function) or plucking
them from the relational
Note that Zope likely started. Did it? Did you try zopectl stop and
zopectl start again? If so, did it work?
- C
On Nov 22, 2005, at 9:52 AM, michael nt milne wrote:
Hi
My zopeinstance went down and I was getting an 'upstream server'
unknown message from apache. On restarting zope
, at 10:57 AM, michael nt milne wrote:
Yes, I noticed that the deamon wasn't running and so re-started it.
It started up fine but that was the message I received. Just
wondered what happened etc..
On 11/22/05, Chris McDonough [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Note that
Zope likely started. Did
On Nov 22, 2005, at 11:27 AM, Gabriel Genellina wrote:
At Tuesday 22/11/2005 05:50, Jürgen Herrmann wrote:
one more question (to the public!):
do we REALLY need dates 1900 / 2036 ? using unix timestamps for
storage and as the base for all conversions would make things a lot
easier!
Sure.
On Nov 27, 2005, at 8:13 PM, Dennis Allison wrote:
here to begin to track this one down. The failure
is spontaneous and apparently not triggered by any readily
distinguishable
inputs or pattern of inputs. The behavior smells a bit of resource
limits
or process synchronization problems,
Does this mean that you haven't seen the errors since installing
Andy's patch? If not, I'd declare victory and forget about using the
deadlock debugger (unless you want to do it for learning purposes only).
On Nov 27, 2005, at 8:46 PM, Dennis Allison wrote:
Just went throught that
Chris,
A helpful suggestion. The commit errors I've been seeing have to
do with the intereaction of the ZODB, MySQL, session variables, and
conflicts.
So the patch that Andy sent over is a fix that prevents the mysql
adapter from raising an error when a conflict exception occurs? Do
you
So far I have not had any success with anything else than writing
special methods in my Classes that converts the objects to
dictionaries before passing them to the zpt or Script(Python) in
question.
But that feels like a very awkward way of doing things, and it
makeas it *very*
On Dec 2, 2005, at 9:49 AM, Paul Winkler wrote:
You know, some days I wonder why it is that Zope is the
only framework around that needs to distinguish between
trusted and untrusted code. Nobody else seems to be
looking at us with envy in this regard.
Historically I know it was because there was
On Dec 8, 2005, at 9:29 PM, Dennis Allison wrote:
On Fri, 14 Oct 2005, Chris McDonough wrote:
The problem I am trying to resolve appears to be load related. The
observed symptom is that (some) session variables spontaneously
disappear.
There appears to be some connection to conflicts
haven't seen it yet: Chris McDonough has a
transcript of this morning's chat up at:
http://plope.com/Members/chrism/foundation_dec9
BTW, I'm sorry I couldn't make it this morning: I was waiting to
board
a plane in Birmingham.
Tres
There is nothing that needs to be done here. It's only if you
*mutate* values stored in the session that you need to do explicit
persistence triggering. I provided an example of doing this in my
last email.
- C
On Dec 15, 2005, at 4:20 PM, Dennis Allison wrote:
Chris McDonnough
session variables. What I want to be able to do is have the coders
call
getSessionVariable(name)
to get the current value of the session variable and
setSessionVariable(name, value)
to save the value. The type of the variable should be transparent
to the
programmer--that
I don't understand the problem. How is using XML-RPC incompatible
with persistence? What are you trying to exclude?
- C
On Dec 16, 2005, at 6:40 AM, Jan-Ole Esleben wrote:
Thanks; this is a problem we are well aware of. Our solution is to
increase the amount of workers, obviously.
On Dec 16, 2005, at 8:02 PM, Jan-Ole Esleben wrote:
I don't understand the problem. How is using XML-RPC incompatible
with persistence? What are you trying to exclude?
I'm sorry, but I don't understand _that_ question. What am I trying to
_exclude_?
You said:
it would most certainly be
The problem setup is this; I explained it above, but it this has
become a long thread:
I write a ZOPE product. I want to make use of other software on the
internet and the services that software provides. So I use the methods
exposed by that software via SOAP, XML-RPC, whatever.
One of those
You might have a access rule in there that expects to be able to call
something that's missing?
On Dec 19, 2005, at 4:29 AM, Maciej Wisniowski wrote:
Hi!
After upgrading our Zope instances from Zope 2.7.2 to 2.8.4 we've
noticed
new kind of errors in event.log on one of our servers. Error
Trimmed Zope-dev from this (cross-posts are bad)...
Dennis,
Lets just put the question out there: Does:
SESSION['someKey'] = someValue
Force a commited transaction?
As opposed to ...
someDict = Session['SomeKey']
someDict['aKey'] = 'aNewValue'
Neither forces a committed transaction, but
The structure of the method is simple enough: there is a large
dtml-let
block which populates local variables with data from the session
variables
dtml-let foobar=getSessionVariable('foobar')
...
with the body of the dtml-let containing 300 lines or so of dtml,
Write conflicts happen for a transaction. In Zope, there is one
transaction per request.
There are two distinct sections to the navigation_box transaction.
There's a transaction for something named navigation_box? Is this
an IFRAME?
One
where the session variables are read and a
On Dec 21, 2005, at 10:32 AM, Dennis Allison wrote:
Thanks again Chris for the helpful comments.
The navigation_box, in this context is just a table which is rendered
into a frame in our standard frameset. It is not an iframe.
So you do use frames! That's a huge clue. I wish I didn't feel
On Dec 21, 2005, at 11:38 AM, Dennis Allison wrote:
Chris,
You asked about frames a while back and I responded in the
affirmative.
I am sure I mentioned that we use frames and framesets and
explained that
we use a bit of Javascript to manage loading individual frames
rather than
On Dec 21, 2005, at 12:40 PM, Dennis Allison wrote:
Chris W,
The issue here has had to do with session variables and their
iteraction
with the persistence mechanism and conflicts and multiple threads
for the
same session. Chris McDonough has pointed out that session
variables can
cause
On Dec 21, 2005, at 1:07 PM, Dennis Allison wrote:
Sorry if I appeared unresponsive--the fact that we use frames is
hardly a
secret. I suppose that it would be helpful to make up soem
summary of
features for ongoing threads like this one.
It was a secret to me (again, perhaps because of
On Dec 21, 2005, at 2:17 PM, Dennis Allison wrote:
I have begun to think that the Zope session variable mechanism, as
implemented, addresses a different part of the storage spectrum
than we
need. A small number of per user parameters (3 to 10) are used by
almost
every request. Most of the
Hi Francisco,
This may not be what you *want* to read ;-), but this is how I (and
many others) do it:
http://www.plope.com/Members/chrism/zope_collab
- C
On Dec 23, 2005, at 2:16 PM, Francisco Chamorro wrote:
Hi everyone, I have a process question and wanted to know what
tools are
If you're developing at the Python Product level (rather than at
the through the web level), this blob product might help:
http://www.plope.com/software/blob
On Feb 1, 2006, at 5:22 PM, Rakotomandimby Mihamina wrote:
Hi,
In order to learn developping for Zope, I want to learn manipulate
This little bit of code has some clues:
def put(self, code, t, desc):
if code not in ('A', 'B', 'I', 'E'):
raise unknown request code %s % code
if code == 'B':
self.start = t
self.method, self.url = desc.strip().split()
elif code ==
On Feb 3, 2006, at 1:06 PM, Paul Winkler wrote:
If I were in your shoes the first thing I'd do is bump up the log
levels
on both zope and zeo to BLATHER. Adds overhead I know, but you
need to find
the problem somehow... it's a weird one, I've never seen zope
restart for no reason.
This
Apache does its own buffering IIRC. Look for ProxyReceiveBufferSize/
ProxyIOBufferSize.
On Feb 18, 2006, at 3:59 AM, Christoph Berendes wrote:
To prevent browser timeout during a long running process, I've got
the following code to work nicely,when the browser accesses Zope
directly
I hate to cross-post this, but would it be possible to limit this
discussion to a single list (e.g. zope3-dev, maybe)? I'm interested
in this topic, but my mail client isn't smart enough to filter it out
to only one place and I'm sure there are a lot of other people with
the same issue.
I dunno about sucking because they are quite good for documentation,
but I tend to write plain-old unittests instead of doctests when I'm
testing without any pretense towards writing documentation. If you
test internals of a class in a doctest, the doctest body gets pretty
cluttered,
301 - 400 of 1687 matches
Mail list logo
